Is paragraph 55 direct or indirect argument?
Does he prove that criminal procedure against the colonies would fail, by sign or by deduction?
Do the four precedents which he cites of Ireland, Wales, Durham, and Chester prove that his plan will work in America?
Upon what general principle do all arguments from example depend?
Is paragraph 79 in itself exposition or argument?
What method is adopted in paragraph 88 to prove that the principle of concession is applicable to America?
How does he prove that Americans were grieved by taxes?
How does he establish the competence of the colony assemblies?
How could the arguments have made “the conclusion irresistible”? (Paragraph 112.)
What principle of argument is stated in paragraph 114?