II

[Epic and Romance]

The complex nature of Epic[16]
No kind or aspect of life that may not be included[16]
This freedom due to the dramatic quality of true (e.g. Homeric) Epic
as explained by Aristotle
[17]
[17]
Epic does not require a magnificent ideal subject
such as those of the artificial epic (Aeneid, Gerusalemme Liberata, Paradise Lost)
[18]
[18]
The Iliad unlike these poems in its treatment of "ideal" motives (patriotism, etc.)[19]
True Epic begins with a dramatic plot and characters[20]
The Epic of the Northern heroic age is sound in its dramatic conception
and does not depend on impersonal ideals (with exceptions, in the Chansons de geste)
[20]
[21]
The German heroes in history and epic (Ermanaric, Attila, Theodoric)[21]
Relations of Epic to historical fact[22]
The epic poet is free in the conduct of his story
but his story and personages must belong to his own people
[23]
[26]
Nature of Epic brought out by contrast with secondary narrative poems, where the subject is not national[27]
This secondary kind of poem may be excellent, but is always different in character from native Epic[28]
Disputes of academic critics about the "Epic Poem"[30]
Tasso's defence of Romance. Pedantic attempts to restrict the compass of Epic[30]
Bossu on Phaeacia[31]
Epic, as the most comprehensive kind of poetry, includes Romance as one of its elements
but needs a strong dramatic imagination to keep Romance under control
[32]
[33]

III

[Romantic Mythology]

Mythology not required in the greatest scenes in Homer[35]
Myths and popular fancies may be a hindrance to the epic poet, but he is compelled to make some use of them[36]
He criticises and selects, and allows the characters of the gods to be modified in relation to the human characters[37]
Early humanism and reflexion on myth—two processes: (1) rejection of the grosser myths; (2) refinement of myth
through poetry

[40]
Two ways of refining myth in poetry—(1) by turning it into mere fancy, and the more ludicrous things into comedy;
(2) by finding an imaginative or an ethical meaning in it

[40]
Instances in Icelandic literature—Lokasenna[41]
Snorri Sturluson, his ironical method in the Edda[42]
The old gods rescued from clerical persecution[43]
Imaginative treatment of the graver myths—the death of Balder; the Doom of the Gods[43]
Difficulties in the attainment of poetical self-command[44]
Medieval confusion and distraction[45]
Premature "culture"[46]
Depreciation of native work in comparison with ancient literature and with theology[47]
An Icelandic gentleman's library[47]
The whalebone casket[48]
Epic not wholly stifled by "useful knowledge"[49]

IV

[The Three Schools—Teutonic Epic—French Epic—The Icelandic Histories]

Early failure of Epic among the Continental Germans[50]
Old English Epic invaded by Romance (Lives of Saints, etc.)[50]
Old Northern (Icelandic) poetry full of romantic mythology[51]
French Epic and Romance contrasted[51]
Feudalism in the old French Epic (Chansons de Geste) not unlike the prefeudal "heroic age"[52]
But the Chansons de Geste are in many ways "romantic"[53]
Comparison of the English Song of Byrhtnoth (Maldon, a.d. 991) with the Chanson de Roland[54]
Severity and restraint of Byrhtnoth[55]
Mystery and pathos of Roland[56]
Iceland and the German heroic age[57]
The Icelandic paradox—old-fashioned politics together with clear understanding[58]
Icelandic prose literature—its subject, the anarchy of the heroic age; its methods, clear and positive[59]
The Icelandic histories, in prose, complete the development of the early Teutonic Epic poetry[60]

[CHAPTER II]