APPENDIX No. 14.

Tonnage of Shipping Entered and Cleared in the United Kingdom, United States, France, Holland, Norway, Prussia, and Sweden, distinguishing between National and Foreign Ships from 1850 to 1873. With Cargoes and in Ballast.

Years.United Kingdom.
British Tonnage.Foreign Tonnage.Total Tonnage.
18509,442,5445,062,52014,505,064
65·1 per cent.34·9 per cent.
186013,914,92310,774,36924,689,292
56·3 per cent.43·7 per cent.
187025,072,18011,568,00236,640,182
68·4 per cent.31·6 per cent.
Years.United States.
United States Tonnage.Foreign Tonnage.Total Tonnage.
18505,205,8043,503,8378,709,641
59·8 per cent.40·2 per cent.
186012,087,2094,977,91617,065,125
70·8 per cent.29·2 per cent.
18706,992,96711,332,09518,325,062
38·2 per cent.61·8 per cent.
Years.France.
French Tonnage.Foreign Tonnage.Total Tonnage.
18501,891,5122,719,2074,610,719
41 per cent.59 per cent.
18603,502,9124,953,8248,456,736
41·4 per cent.58·6 per cent.
18704,289,2069,317,53113,606,737
31·5 per cent.68·5 per cent.
Years.Holland.
Dutch Tonnage.Foreign Tonnage.Total Tonnage.
1850935,2831,301,1522,236,435
41·8 per cent.58·2 per cent.
18601,341,7112,053,2693,394,980
39·5 per cent.60·5 per cent.
18701,323,4753,341,4484,664,923
28·4 per cent.71·6 per cent.
Years.Norway.
Norwegian Tonnage.Foreign Tonnage.Total Tonnage.
18501,050,307346,6391,396,945
75·2 per cent.24·8 per cent.
18601,513,369516,6672,030,036
74·5 per cent.25·5 per cent.
18702,264,233967,7533,231,986
70 per cent.30 per cent.
Years.Prussia.
Prussian Tonnage.Foreign Tonnage.Total Tonnage.
18501,026,3781,063,9802,090,358
49·1 per cent.50·9 per cent.
18601,711,4421,588,3823,299,824
51·9 per cent.48·1 per cent.
18702,893,2143,301,5306,194,744
46·7 per cent.53·3 per cent.
Years.Sweden.
Swedish Tonnage.Foreign Tonnage.Total Tonnage.
1850462,884604,0021,066,886
43·4 per cent.56·6 per cent.
1860560,066828,3861,388,452
40·3 per cent.59·7 per cent.
18701,374,4332,954,1514,328,584
31·8 per cent.68·2 per cent.

FOOTNOTES:

[314] Extract from the ‘New York Herald’ of 10th October, 1860:—

“Maritime Relations.”

“Remarks of Mr. W. S. Lindsay, M.P., at the Chamber of Commerce meeting, Tuesday evening, 9th October.

“Mr. Lindsay said: ... With these preliminary remarks, allow me to state to you the objects which I have in view in meeting you this evening. I will speak first in reference to the liability of Shipowners, because that, perhaps, is one of the most important questions, and one which I think is not sufficiently understood. I do not think that it is generally known how the Shipowners of both countries stand with regard to each other on this question. As our respective laws now stand, any Shipowner of this country or of England, however wealthy, may rise any morning and find himself a ruined man. That is a serious thing to consider. The law of England limits the responsibility of our Shipowners to the value of the ship and freight. In most other countries of Europe the responsibility of the Shipowners is also limited to a similar extent. That is likewise the law in this country, as far as I understand your law. That is to say, if one of your ships runs down another at sea, and you pay into your courts the value of the ship and freight, your responsibility cannot be carried beyond that value. Now this is very good so far as the laws of the respective countries stand. But if my ship runs down another ship in which any American subject is interested, I am made responsible, in your courts, not merely for the value of my ship and freight, but for whatever amount of damage may have been sustained through the collision brought about by my ship. Therefore if my ship runs down a vessel with cargo and freight on board to the extent of 200,000l. sterling, I would be responsible for the whole. If, on the other hand, your ships at sea run down any other ship in which a British subject is interested, and the action for loss is raised in our courts, you are held responsible for the full amount of the damage which your ship caused. This arises from the fact that our laws have jurisdiction only over British ships, and your laws have jurisdiction over only American ships. Now, considering the vast trade which is carried on between the two countries, I hope you may agree with me in the opinion, that as the laws of both countries are similar, the Shipowner’s liability in the courts of either country should in all cases be limited to the value of the ship and freight. I hope you will use your influence to extend that limitation to the vessels of both countries, which might easily be done by a convention between the two nations....”

[315] Goods imported in foreign vessels not being the produce or manufacture of that country pay one-fifth more duty than if imported in Portuguese vessels.

[316] 810l. allowed to persons exempt.