The Criticism of the Fourth Gospel / Eight Lectures on the Morse Foundation, Delivered in the Union Seminary, New York in October and November 1904

by W. Sanday

[74]. See, however, the Oxford Society of Hist. Theol., N. T. in Apost. Fathers (1905), p. 84.

[75]. Ibid., pp. 64, 67, 69; on the use of the Fourth Gospel, pp. 81-83 (a judicious estimate).

[76]. Ignatius von Antiochien, pp. 46 ff.

[77]. Strangely enough, the Oxford Society’s committee do not mention this phrase, though it presents a stronger case than any of those on p. [31].

[78]. Hibbert Journal i. 529.

[79]. Character, &c. 157.

[80]. Hibbert Journal ii. 610.

[81]. Chronologie, p. 675.

[82]. Die Offenbarung Johannis, p. 208.

[83]. It is pointed out to me by Dr. V. Bartlet that the sentence in the Fragment about the dead raised to life is really a new statement not connected with the sentences preceding which are referred to Papias. I am inclined to think that this is right, and that the authority may be Quadratus.