[7] Ibid., p. 62.
[8] W. James's Text-Book of Psychology, p. 145.
[9] William Wallace's Lectures and Essays on Natural Theology and Ethics, p. 210.
[10] Edward Caird's Introduction to William Wallace's Gifford Lectures, pp. xxx, xxxi.
[11] On this conception of the spiritual as More, cf. Bosanquet's Psychology of the Moral Self.
[12] Cf. Wicksteed's The Religion of Time and the Religion of Eternity, in Carpenter and Wicksteed's Studies in Theology.
[13] Eucken's best account of this subject is found in Parts I., II., and V. of his Truth of Religion and in Beiträge zur Weiterentwickelung der Religion, pp. 240-281. This latter is a volume of ten essays by well-known German religious teachers.
[14] The President of the British Association (1912) states in his address that it is not within his province to touch the question concerning the nature of the soul. I take the report of his address from Nature, 5th September. Dr Haldane goes much further in the direction of Vitalism (discussion at British Association on the subject).
[15] Cf. Driesch: Philosophy of the Organism; Vitalismus als Geschichte und Lehre; his article in Lebensanschauung (a collection of essays by twenty German thinkers, 1911); Reinke's Philosophie der Botanik; McDougall's Body and Mind; Thomson's Heredity, Evolution, and Introduction to Science (the two latter in the Home University Library). Bergson's Creative Evolution deals with the subject, but the value of this book is greater in other directions. T.H. Morgan's Regeneration is a weighty contribution to the subject.
[16] A revival of the study of Kant's first Critique would be of great value to our natural scientists. Green, in his Prolegomena to Ethics, has interpreted this aspect in a manner that ought not to be forgotten. Cf. further Edward Caird's Evolution of Religion, vol. i.