[328] R.F. pp. 191, 341.
[329] "The place of the Sondergötter in Greek Polytheism," printed in Anthropological Essays addressed to E. B. Tylor, p. 81. Usener's discussion of the Roman and Lithuanian Sondergötter is in his Götternamen, p. 73 foll.
[330] Wissowa writes (Ges. Abhandl. p. 320 note) that he has reason to believe that a great number of the Lithuanian Sondergötter only became such through the treatment of the subject by the mediaeval writers on whom Usener relied!
[331] Ges. Abhandl. p. 304 foll.
[332] Servius (Interpol.) ad Georg. i. 21.
[333] Henzen, Acta Fratr. Arv. p. 147; C.I.L. vi. 2099 and 2107.
[334] Op. cit. p. 323 foll.; for famuli and anculi divi, Henzen, op. cit. p. 145.
[335] See above, p. 121.
[336] p. 312; cp. 320, where he further asserts his belief that Varro is responsible himself for the creation of a great number of these Sondergötter, owing to his extreme desire to fix and define the function of every deity in relation to human life; just as the mediaeval writers Laskowski and Pretorius may have created many Lithuanian Sondergötter. As I am not quite clear on this point, I have not mentioned it in the text.
[337] Op. cit. p. 314, note 1. See above, note 33.