The best method of treatment as regards the Christian names borne by the people during this period is to give a list of the more common names. Now there is a list ready to hand giving the names—Christian and surname—of Cade’s Kentish followers. The whole number of men on the list amounts to 1719. I have gone through the list and transcribed the Christian names. The following is the result, classified according to frequency. The names present themselves to us rather unexpectedly. Thus, we have them as follows:—

John546Andreweach 2
William277Benedict
Thomas233Augustine
Richard196Salmon
Robert115Herman
Henry53
Nicolas and
Stephen
each 37
Alexandereach 1
Alexius
Roger33Christopher
Simon22David
Laurence21Gerard
Peter and
Walter
each 17Marcus
Lodowik
James15Vincentius
Ralph12Valentine
Hugh8Goodman
Adam7Gilbert
Philip6Daniel
Alaneach 5Waldus
EliasClement
DionysiusSampson
George
Galfrid
Hamo
Guyeach 3
Bernard
Bartholomew
Michael

It will be seen that there are only forty-eight names in all. One-third of the men are named John, one-sixth William, one-seventh Thomas, one-eighth Richard, one-fifteenth Robert, one-thirtieth Henry; and that more than thirty out of the forty-eight names are used less than six times each. Two-thirds of the people are called either John, William, Thomas, Richard, or Robert. And all the Saxon names except one are clean gone and forgotten. Not one Alfred, Edward, Ethelred among them all.

Here, again, is another list containing the names of 130 men. They come out in the following order:—

John34Henry8Nicholas4
William17Roger5Walter3
Thomas15Adam5Alexander2
Richard10Stephen3Simon2
Robert8Geoffrey3

And once:—Laurence, James, Peter, Godfrey, Alan, Giles, Gilbert, Andrew, Raynard.

Here, too, Saxon names have gone quite out of use. Among the names of women we find Johanna or Joan very common. Also frequently met with are the names of Isabel, Matilda, Alison, Lucy, Petronilla (Parnel), Agnes, Idonia, Avica, Elecota, Richolda, Ecota, Claricia, Arabella, Theophania (Tiffany), Massanda, Desiderata, Fynea, Massilia, Auncelia, Godiyeva.

As regards the women’s names, I have taken them from the Calendar of Wills and arranged them in alphabetical order. It will be observed that though Saxon Christian names have entirely died out among men, many are preserved among women. It will also be observed that many beautiful names have been lost to us, though they might very well be revived. In spelling there are varieties, of which a few are here marked:—

AdreyCollectaHelenMary
AwdreyColletHelynMassia
ColettaHeliwysaMassilia
AgataConstanceHesterMatilda
AgathaCreynaHildaMaudelyn
AgnesCristinaHodiernaMawdlyne
AlanaCustance Mawde
Albreda IbbotaMazerb
AlbricaDenysIdaMelina
AldithaDeonisiaIdaniaMilicent
AleisiaDionisiaIdoneaMilsenda
AlianoraDiamandaImaniaMuriel
AliceDorkesIsabella
AlielmaDulceIsoldaOlive
Allesia IsoudeOrabilia
AlusiaEarildaIzanOsey
AlvevaEdith
AmabilliaEdythJacobinaPavya
AmiaEgidiaJacominePernella
AmyEdelenaJanePetronilla
EleanoraJenetPhilippa
AmisiaElenaJoane
AmiciaEliciaJohanRayna
AnabillaElizabethJohanettaReyna
AneblaEmJohannaRebecca
AnastasiaEmmaJoyceRicholda
AnnaEmotaJouetteRoberga
AnneysErminaJuettaRoesia
AnselinaErneburgaJulianaRoisia
AuncelinaEssabellaJulyanRoysia
ArgentillaEstrildaJudithRosa
AtheleneEtheldreda Rose
AuncillaEustachiaKastanyaRosamund
AuncilliaEveKatherine
Aundryna Sabina
AvelinaFeliciaLaurenciaSabine
AviceFiliatLeciaSallerna
FlorenceLieciaSandrissa
BarbaraFloriaLetiaSarah
BasiliaFloriciaLeticiaScolastica
BeatriceFrechesaunchiLenotaSenicla
BeatrixFridiswidaLoraaSecilia
BersabeFrancesLoretaSibil
Blanche LucebettaSita
BonaGenaLucekySuzanna
BoneioyaGencelinaLucySusan
BridgettGennoraLumaSwanilda
GodaLydia
CassandraGodeleva Thomasina
CastaniaGonildaMabelThomasyn
CecilleyGraceMagotaThypphanya
CeciliaGreciaMargeryTyffaniaa
CharityGunnildaMargaretTheophani
CheraGunnoraMarion
Cisceley MarionaWillelma
ClariceHannaMarsiliaWynmarka
ClariciaHawisiaMassiliaWyleholta
ClemenceHawysaMartha

I have also drawn up a list of surnames belonging to London citizens in the thirteenth, fourteenth, and fifteenth centuries. Such a list very properly belongs to the history of London. It may be analysed by any who desire to investigate the origins of names. For the purpose of this work, I have found it to be sufficient to take the analysis made by Riley for his Memorials of London and London Life. It is in substance as follows:—