Table V.—Distribution of Cold and Warmth Spots.
By stimulation of cold or warmth spots there is shown, not only the quality and quantity of the stimulus, but the locality. When punctiform stimuli are applied to pairs of cold spots and pairs of warmth spots marked “local sign” is found. This Goldscheider showed to be higher for cold than warmth spots.
| Cold Spots. | Warmth Spots | |
| Palm | .8 mm. | Do. 2 mm. |
| Cheek, Chin and forehead | 0.8 mm. | Do. 5.0 mm. |
| Upper arm | 2 mm. | Do. 3 mm. |
| Back of hand, leg, thigh | 3 mm. | Do. 4 mm. |
| Forearm | 3 mm. | Do. 3 mm. |
| Back, chest, abdomen | 2 mm. | Do. 5 mm. |
Thus on the palm of the hand two pairs of cold spots .8 mm. apart are distinguished by this punctiform stimulation, whereas on this surface two pairs of warmth spots are only distinguished when they are 2 mm. apart on the cheek, chin or forehead and cold spots are distinguished when .8 mm. apart on the same surfaces warmth spots when 5 mm. apart.
Table VI.—Average lowest distances in millimetres on different areas of skin where two points are felt as two or minimal distances from which double sensation is obtained.
Table VII.—(According to Weber’s Law.) Average differences in different regions of skin of sensation of pressure.
| Forehead | ![]() | 1/30 to 1/40 |
| Lips | ||
| Dorsum of tongue | ||
| Cheeks | ||
| Temple | ||
| Finger nail | ![]() | 1/10 to 1/20 |
| Dorsal surface of forearm, leg, and thigh | ||
| Dorsal surface of hand | ||
| Dorsal surface of 1st and 2nd phalanges of fingers | ||
| Palmar surface of finger | ||
| Palmar surface of hand | ||
| Flexor surface of forearm | ||
| Dorsum of foot | ![]() | More than 1/10 |
| Dorsal surface of toes | ||
| Plantar surface of toes | ||
| Sole of foot | ||
| Surface of leg and thigh |
Thus on the forehead differences of pressure are distinguished when they are increased by 1/30, whereas on the dorsum of the foot they have to be increased by 1/10 to be distinguished. This is carried out by impact of little balls of a light substances such as pith.
It may be remarked of these tabulated results that on the one hand they are the results of work extending over some seventy years and numerous observers, and on the other that, broadly looked at, they all tell the same story of stimuli in their incidence on the skin—those of pain, cold, warmth and touch. There is also one thread of origin running through all, and that is that the regions most exposed to the four stimuli show the highest development of specialised function and structure.

