I have likewise thought it right to add the Conclusions, without any alteration, which were written for the complete edition, when, for the first time, having examined all the evidence, I was in a position to wind up the case. This is all the more necessary as they finally show the inadequacy of Dr. Lightfoot's treatment. But I have still more been moved to append these Conclusions in order to put them within easier reach of those who only possess the earlier editions, which do not contain them.

Dr. Lightfoot again reproaches me with my anonymity. I do not think that I am open to much rebuke for not having the courage of my opinions; but I may distinctly say that I have always held that arguments upon very serious subjects should be impersonal, and neither gain weight by the possession of a distinguished name nor lose by the want of it. I leave the Bishop any advantage he has in his throne, and I take my stand upon the basis of reason and not of reputation.

CONTENTS

I. A REPLY TO DR. LIGHTFOOT'S FIRST ESSAY ON "SUPERNATURAL RELIGION"

II. THE SILENCE OF EUSEBIUS—THE IGNATIAN EPISTLES
III. POLYCARP OF SMYRNA
IV. PAPIAS OF HIERAPOLIS
V. MELITO OF SARDIS—CLAUDIUS APOLLINARIS—POLYCRATES
VI. THE CHURCHES OF GAUL
VII. TATIAN'S "DIATESSARON"