[15:1] Dr. Lightfoot is mistaken in his ingenious conjecture of my having been misled by the "nur" of Credner; but so scrupulous a critic might have mentioned that I not only refer to Credner for this argument, but also to De Wette, who has "… dass er nie Joh. dem Taüfer wie der Synoptiker den Beinamen [Greek: ho Baptistês] giebt" (Einl. N.T. p. 230), and to Bleek, who says, "nicht ein einziges Mal" (Beiträge, p. 178, and Einl. N.T. p. 150), which could not be misread.
[16:1] Contemporary Review, December, p. 15; Essays on S.R. p. 21 f.
[16:2] Clem. Alex. Strom. vii. 17-106. Dr. Westcott gives the above reference, but does not quote the passage.
[16:3] Dr. Westcott quotes the passage relative to Matthias.
[17:1] Canon, p. 255 f.
[17:2] The same remarks apply to the two passages, pointed out by Tischendorf, from Clement of Alexandria and Epiphanius.
[18:1] Luthardt, Der Johann. Ursprung des viert. Evang. 1874, p. 85 f.
[19:1] Strom. vii. 17, § 106.
[19:2] Canon, p. 255.
[19:3] Contemporary Review, December, p. 16 [Essays, p. 22].