[24:5] S.R. i. p. 360, note 1. Dr. Lightfoot, of course, "can hardly suppose" that "I had read the passage to which I refer."
[25:1] Contemporary Review, p. 9 [ibid. p. 13].
[26:1] Contemporary Review, p. 9 [ibid. p. 13].
[26:2] I cannot go through every instance, but I may briefly say that such a passage as "Ye are of your father the devil" and the passage Matt. xi. 27 seq. are no refutation whatever of my statement of the contrast between the fourth Gospel and the Synoptics; and that the allusion to Paul's teaching in the Apocalypse is in no way excluded even by his death. Regarding the relations between Paul and the "pillar" Apostles, I hope to speak hereafter. I must maintain that my argument regarding the identification of an eye-witness (ii. p. 444 ff.) sufficiently meets the reasoning to which Dr. Lightfoot refers.
[27:1] Contemporary Review, p. 11 f. [ibid. p. 16].
[27:2] Ibid. p. 10 [ibid. p. 14].
[28:1] S.R. ii. p. 402.
[28:2] Ibid. ii. p. 406.
[28:3] See Acts iv. 13.
[28:4] S.R. ii. p. 410.