[307] “Kriminalstat. f. d. Jahr 1895”, I, p. 25. [↑]
[308] Drähms, “The Criminal”, p. 228, and “Criminal Statistics”, 1894–1900, Table XXXV. [↑]
[309] After “Criminal Statistics”, 1894–1900, Table IX. [↑]
[310] “Ergebnisse der Strafrechtspflege in den im Reichsrate vertretenen Königreichen und Ländern im Jahre 1899”, p. li. [↑]
[311] The figures for 1850–1880 are taken from Bournet, “De la criminalité en France et en Italie”, p. 31, for the Assizes, and from Joly, “La France criminelle”, p. 166, for the others; the figures for 1881–1900 are from the “Rapport sur l’administration de la justice criminelle de 1881 à 1900”, p. lxii. [↑]
[312] “Rapport etc.”, pp. lxiv and lxv. [↑]
[313] After Bournet “De la criminalité en France et en Italie”, p. 32, and “Statistica giudiziaria penale”, 1881–1889. The criminal statistics for 1890–95 contain all those convicted including those brought before the justices of the peace, which makes them not comparable with those given above. The average figure for 1891–95 was 25.27%, and for 1896–1900, 30.19% (“Notizie complementari etc.”, 1896–1900). [↑]
[314] After the “Jaarcijfers voor het Koninkrijk der Nederlanden”, 1901, p. 121.
[Note to the American Edition: The general percentage of recidivism in the Netherlands had risen to 44.5% in 1908.] [↑]
[315] On short imprisonments for minor offenses see von Liszt, “Kriminalpolitische Aufgaben”, V, “Die kurzzeitige Freiheitsstrafe” (“Zeitschr. f. d. ges. Strw.” IX). [↑]