Years.Good Character Hitherto.Character Unknown.Price of Wheat.
Sh.d.
1858 153,576 138,388 43 11
1859 153,369 150,084 43 8
1860 137,574 144,485 52 9
1864 167,038 165,808 40 2

The author explains that the crimes against property are one of the consequences of the struggle for existence, a fact which accounts in part for the high figures for criminality in the great cities, where competition is most intense. The author treats of theft, and begins by saying that the connection between the price of provisions and theft is very close.

France.

Years. Thefts. Price of Cereals.
fr.
1856 18,222 16.75
1857 17,218 16.75,,
1858 15,537 16.75,,
1859 14,755 16.75,,
1860 15,707 20.24

During the following years the prices fell. Nevertheless the number of thefts increased. According to Fuld we can draw the conclusion that the influence of price is only relative!—This table proves little. For, while in 1856 criminality attained its highest point, prices were lower than in 1860; and, while the figures for theft diminished greatly, prices remained constant.—

England.

Years.Thefts.Price of Cereals.
With Violence.Without Violence.
Sh.d.
1857 6471 43,397 42 10
1858 5723 45,618 43 11
1859 4433 41,370 43 8
1860 4065 41,151 52 9
1861 5062 40,242 55 4
1862 5746 40,191 55 5
1863 5433 39,801 44 9
1864 5022 39,481 40 2
1865 5160 40,383 41 10
1866 5088 39,731 43 10
1867 6355 46,502 49 10

[[59]]

Here there is some agreement between the number of thefts and prices. But it is not as great as Fuld would make out. For example, notwithstanding the sudden rise on prices in 1860, criminality diminished, while the year following there was a still further fall in the thefts without violence.

Prussia.