XVII.

H. Müller.

In the introduction to his work, “Untersuchungen über die Bewegung der Criminalität in ihrem Zusammenhang mit dem wirtschaftlichen Verhältnissen”, Dr. Müller describes the result of his researches as follows: “In the course of our discussion it will appear that with time the state of industry, the greater or less chance to get work, the activity or depression of the general economic life, have gradually become of far more significance for the increase or decrease of crime, than a rise or fall in the price of provisions, and that at present these factors have reduced the economic meaning of the price of provisions to a minimum.”[46]

The period examined (1854–1895) is divided into two parts, because the criminal statistics of the empire, which are to be had from 1882 on, give the number of crimes and criminals, while the Prussian statistics give the number of new cases brought before the examining magistrate.

The figures for these years are as follows:

Prussia, 1854–1878. New Cases to 100,000 of the Population.

Years. Against Property. Against Persons. Against the State,
Public Order,
and Religion.
1854 416 78
1855 436 78 41
1856 472 81 47
1857 324 95 55
1858 288 103 54
1859 295 103 51
1860 310 102 56
1861 314 93 52
1862 313 105 54
1863 288 111 53
1864 290 115 56
1865 325 121 58
1866 314 109 55[[75]]
1867 360 112 51
1868 392 117 52
1869 338 126 53
1870 296 99 46
1871 254 75 41
1872 281 94 56
1873 266 106 64
1874 295 125 81
1875 284 135 84
1876 315 142 89
1877 341 160 87
1878 370 164 103

Prussia, 1882–1895. Persons Convicted to 100,000 Inhabitants over 12 Years.

Years. Against Property. Against Persons. Against the State,
Public Order,
and Religion.
1882 545 328 180
1883 520 343 174
1884 527 382 188
1885 492 385 185
1886 488 402 196
1887 475 421 203
1888 466 404 200
1889 503 423 197
1890 496 449 199
1891 520 443 190
1892 575 458 199
1882–91 510 404 194
1894 528 527 219

Now, the causes that make crime increase when there is an economic depression are, according to the author, the following: “The instinct of self-preservation, which in its harmonious development is the motive for the lawful and moral struggle of men for existence, and in more restricted form is the principal ground for industrial activity, in its degeneration … demands a certain, often high, percentage of victims, who fall into crime, especially theft, fraud, embezzlement, and other offenses against property. And experience shows that the [[76]]greater the care to maintain existence, or often simply to procure daily bread, the greater is the number of offenses against property. When need appears, at the same time comes the instinct impelling a man to seize the property of another, better situated than himself. Infractions of property are in part to be ascribed to other motives. There is nothing to show, however, that these motives (greed and covetousness, for example) are stronger in one year and weaker in another throughout a whole people. We must rather ascribe to them a certain uniformity in their influence upon criminal activity. The determining factor in the increase and decrease of crimes remains the general well-being of a people, in earlier times the price of the necessities of life, at the present the opportunity for employment.”[47]