| Animals. | Refuse- heap, Perthi- Chwareu. | Cave No.1. | Cave No. 2. | Cave Rhosdigre No. 1 | Cave Rhosdigre No. 2. | Cave Rhosdigre No. 3. | The Cefn Cave. | Cairn of Tyddyn Bleiddyn, near Cefn. |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| DOMESTIC. | ||||||||
| Canis familiaris—Dog | X | X | X | X | X | X | X | |
| Sus scrofa—Pig | X | X | X | X | X | X | X | X |
| Equus caballus—Horse | X | X | X | X | X | X | ||
| Bos longifrons—Celtic Short-horn | X | X | X | X | X | X | ||
| Capra hircus—Goat | X | X | X | X | X | X | X | X |
| WILD. | ||||||||
| Canis lupus—Wolf | X | |||||||
| Canis vulpes—Fox | X | X | X | X | X | X | ||
| Meles taxus—Badger | X | X | X | X | X | X | ||
| Ursus arctos—Bear | X | |||||||
| Sus scrofa—Wild Boar | X | |||||||
| Cervus elaphus—Stag | X | X | X | |||||
| Cervus capreolus—Roe | X | X | X | |||||
| Lepus cuniculus—Rabbit | X | X | X | X | X | |||
| Lepus timidus—Hare | X | X | X | X | ||||
| Polished Celts | X | |||||||
| Flint Flakes or Chips | X | X | X | X | ||||
| Pottery | X | X | X | X | ||||
| Human Skeletons | X | X | X | X | X | X | X | |
| Platycnemic bones | X | X | X | X | X | X | X |
Description of the Human Remains by Professor Busk.
For the following account of the human remains, reprinted from the “Journal of the Ethnological Society,” January 1871, I am indebted to the kindness of my friend Professor Busk, to whom examples of all the forms were forwarded:—
Notes on the Human Remains. By Professor Busk, F.R.S.
§ 1. Introduction.
The remains discovered in the sepulchral cave at Perthi-Chwareu, according to a list furnished by Mr. Boyd Dawkins, are as under; but I believe this catalogue does not include all that were found in the locality.[102]
1. Eleven more or less perfect skulls, some, however, represented by mere fragments.
2. Twelve mandibles.
3. Seven arm-bones or humeri—four right and three left.
4. Six ulnæ.
5. Twenty-two thigh-bones, including five pairs, five odd ones of the right side, and seven of the left; and amongst them are three of very young children.
6. Seventeen tibiæ or leg-bones, nine of the right and eight of the left side, and apparently none of them in pairs; so that there must probably have been a good many more.
7. Eight astragali.
8. Nine calcanea, or heel-bones.
The number of individuals, therefore, whose relics were deposited in this cavern could not have been less than sixteen, and may have been many more. They appear to have been of all ages and of both sexes.
Of the other bones of the skeleton, of which there must have been abundance, I have received no information.
In the Cefn Cave there were discovered:—
1. One mandible.
2. One humerus.
3. Two ulnæ.
4. A pair of thigh-bones.
5. A pair of leg-bones.and in the tumulus:—
1. Portions of seven skulls.
2. Two right humeri.
3. A pair of ulnæ.
4. A right femur.From St. Asaph the only bone that has come under my observation is a single calvaria.
§ 2. Description of the Bones from the Cavern at Perthi-Chwareu.
(a.) General Condition.—In general condition, as regards colour and texture, these bones present some, but no very striking, differences; on the whole they are much alike, though it might be supposed that some have lain longer in the ground than the others. One or two among them (but these are apparently the younger bones) are fragile; the majority, however, are as firm as common churchyard bones, and some have quite the natural degree of hardness. They are of a lightish-yellow colour, do not adhere to the tongue, and afford scarcely any earthy smell when breathed upon or moistened: only one among them presents any staining from oxide of manganese; and this exists in diffuse blotches, and is not at all of the dendritic form. Many are partially covered with a very thin film of crystalline carbonate of lime.
Figs. 40, 41, 42.—Skull from Sepulchral Cave at Perthi-Chwareu.
(b.) The Skulls.—Of these only three of the more perfect have come under my observation. These alone will form the subject of what I have to remark on this portion of the skeleton. But in the subjoined Table I. (p. 171) I have given, together with the dimensions of these three, those of five others which have been furnished to me by Mr. Dawkins.
In the specimen No. 1 (Figs 40, 41, 42) the entire facial part is wanting, together with the whole of the base and a great part of one side of the calvaria. The skull is of an oval form, symmetrical, with a rather prominent occiput. The region of the vertex is slightly and evenly arched; and the forehead, though not high, is vertical, and slightly compressed on the sides. The sutures are all open and finely serrated. The frontal sinuses are distinct though small. The supra-orbital ridge is thin, but rather prominent towards the external angular process. The mastoid processes are very large, and the digastric fossa remarkably deep. The occipital spine is very prominent, as are the lateral ridges. The temporal ridges, also, and, in short, all the muscular impressions, are very strongly marked.
The skull is evidently that of a powerful, muscular man, in the prime of life, and apparently of robust, but not coarse build.[103]
Figs. 43, 44, 45.—Skull from Sepulchral Cave at Perthi-Chwareu.
Skull No. 2 ([Figs. 43, 44, 45]) is that of an adult male, presenting as nearly as possible the same dimensions, form, and other characters as that above described, except that the bone is somewhat thicker and heavier. The muscular ridges and impressions are even more strongly developed than in the former, and especially the temporal ridges immediately above the external angular processes. The left maxilla remains loosely attached, containing the two bicuspid teeth, which are of small size, and worn quite flat, and to such an extent as to render it probable that the man was somewhat advanced in years, although none of the sutures are closed. The face is strictly orthognathous, and the skull dolichocephalic and aphanozygous.[104]
Skull No. 3 is the entire calvaria of a very young individual. The two milk-molars remain on either side; and behind them the first true molar is fully out, but not in the least worn. The incisors and canines have fallen out. The former, from the size of the alveoli, were of the permanent set, but not the latter. The age of the individual, therefore, may be estimated as about seven or eight.
The only point worthy of notice in this calvaria is the existence of a well-marked depression across the middle of the occipital bone, which appears exactly as if it had been caused by the constriction of a bandage. The depression barely extends beyond the lambdoidal suture into the parietals. It requires, perhaps, some imagination to perceive the slight traces of a corresponding depression in the forepart of the skull; but I think a faint depression may be there perceived on careful inspection. The effect of the occipital constriction, if it be such, reminds one of some of the deformed French skulls described by M. Foville[105] and by M. Gosse.[106] In all other respects the skull is well formed and symmetrical. It is strictly orthognathous, and of a broad oval shape.
If deformed artificially, it would come under the head of “tête annulaire” of M. Gosse; and Dr. Foville shows that this kind of deformation arises from the popular custom of applying a kind of bandage round the head of the new-born infant, which, passing over the anterior fontanelle, descends obliquely, and is crossed behind the occiput and brought back and tied in front. This band, or “serre-tête,” he states, is worn during the first year, and for a longer period by female children than by males. Dr. Lunier gives pretty nearly the same account, adding, however, further particulars.[107] It may be remarked, also, that the Berbers, who formed great part of the Moorish forces that invaded Europe in the eighth, ninth, and tenth centuries, used to elongate the skull posteriorly and flatten the forehead.
[Table I.—Dimensions of Perthi-Chwareu Skulls.]
No. Length. Breadth. Height. Least frontal breadth. Greatest frontal breadth. Parietal breadth. Occipital breadth. Zygomatic breadth. Frontal radius. Vertical radius. Parietal radius. Occipital radius. Maxillary radius. Fronto-nasal radius. Circum-
ference.Longi-
tudinal arc.(a) Frontal. (b) Parietal. (c) Occipital. Frontal transverse arc. Vertical transverse arc. Parietal transverse arc. Occipital transverse arc. Latitudinal or cephalic index. Altitudinal index. 1. 7·5 5·7 — 4·0 5·0 5·5 4·6 — — — — — — — 21·2 — 5·0 5·5 — 12·0 13·0 14·0 12·0 ·760 — 2. 7·6 5·7 5·4 4·0 4·9 5·5 4·8 — 4·9 5·0 5·2 4·4 — 3·7 21·6 15·9 5·5 5·6 4·8 13·0 13·5 13·8 12·4 ·750 ·710 3. 6·5 5·2 5·5 3·4 4·5 5·1 4·1 3·9 4·2 4·5 4·7 4·1 3·2 3·0 19·0 14·7 4·9 5·3 4·5 11·6 12·45 13·4 11·2 ·800 ·846 4. 7·4 5·8 5·8 3·9 5·0 5·8 4·4 4·7 4·4 4·6 4·7 4·3 3·9 3·6 23·5 16·9 5·0 5·0 6·? 11·0 13·0 14·0 12·0 ·797 ·797 5. 6·7 5·0 — 3·5 4·4 5·4 4·1 — 4·0 4·3 4·6 4·0 — — 18·5 — 4·4 5·2 — 11·0 12·5 13·4 — ·746 — 6. 6·8 5·4 — 3·6 4·3 5·3 4·0 — 4·3 4·5 4·8 4·2 — — 19·8 14·6 4·8 5·3 4·5 14·0 12·0 13·0 11·0 ·794 — 7. — 5·5 — — — 5·3 — — — — 4·6 4·0 — — — — — — — — — — — — — 8. 7·0 5·2 — 3·6 4·4 5·2 4·1 — 4·1 4·3 4·5 4·1 — 3·4 19·5 — 4·5 4·9 4·8 11·0 11·5 13·0 12·0 ·743 — Mean[A] 7·07 5·5 5·6 3·8 4·64 5·4 4·3 — 4·3 4·5 4·7 4·2 3·5 3·42 20·0 15·3 4·9 5·2 5·0 12·0 12·5 13·5 11·8 ·765[A] — Cefn Cave 7·4 5·7 5·2 3·8 4·7 5·5 4·8 — 4·6 4·6 4·7 4·0 — 3·8 21.0 15·1 5·0 5·5 4·6 12·2 12·8 13·8 12·0 ·770 ·702 Cefn Tumulus 7·38 5·65 — 3·6 4·5 5·55 — — 4·5 4·6 4·9 4·5 — 3·6 — — 5·2 5·2 — 12·4 12·4 12·8 10·9 ·765 — Ditto 7·2 5·6 5·7 3·6 4·35 5·5 4·35 4·6 4·45 4·8 4·9 4·3 — 3·7 20·1 — 5·0 5·0 4·9 12·0 13·1 13·25 11·5 — — 7·5 5·4 5·9 4·0 4·6 5·35 4·35 4·9 5·0 5·0 5·05 4·35 4·2 4·2 20·9 — 4·9 5·6 4·6 12·8 13·25 13·25 10·5 — — Genista Cave,
Gibraltar7·95 5·5 5·7 3·9 5·0 5·4 4·45 5·2 4·7 4·8 4·9 4·25 4·1 3·75 20·6 14·0 5·2 4·8 4·0 12·5 13·2 13·3 11·4 ·748 ·714 Ditto 7·35 5·6 6·1 3·8 4·9 5·4 4·5 5·2 4·75 4·9 5·1 4·9 4·0 3·65 20·8 15·3 4·8 5·6 4·9 12·3 13·2 13·3 11·6 ·761 ·889 [A] In taking this mean, the cephalic index of the young skull, No. 3, is omitted; if included, the mean would be ·785.
Fig. 46.
(c.) Thigh-bones.—I have had an opportunity of examining only a single perfect specimen of the thigh-bones. This is an entire bone, 18·2 inches long, with a least circumference of 3·5. Its perimetral index[108] consequently is ·192, which is about the normal standard. The linea aspera, at the middle of the bone more especially, is very prominent, so that the bone may be termed, in some degree, carinated ([Fig. 46]). The shaft is straight; and the chief peculiarities, besides the prominent linea aspera, which it presents, are (1) an unusual compression in the antero-posterior direction in the upper part, for the extent of about three inches below the trochanter minor. At about two inches below that process, or at a point corresponding with the lower part of the insertion of the pectineus muscle, the shaft measures ·9 × 1·45, whilst in three other ordinary femora with which I have compared it, the bone at the corresponding part measures ·9 × 1·20, ·9 × 1·10, ·9 × 1·15, showing that the Perthi-Chwareu femur is unusually expanded laterally in the upper part of the shaft. The consequence is to give the bone at that part a peculiar aspect, which is especially seen in an acute internal angle, and one rather less acute externally, instead of the usually rounded internal and external borders. (2) The distal extremity appears to be rather disproportionately large as compared with a recent well-formed bone of the same length, the condyles measuring 2·5 × 3·3 instead of 2·4 × 3·05; and the lower part of the shaft is also somewhat expanded. But the chief peculiarity, as above remarked, is the compression of the shaft in the upper part. Besides the linea aspera, all the muscular impressions are strongly marked, and especially those for the insertion of the gluteus maximus and the trochanter minor. The neck is long and very oblique, and the head, upon which only a small portion of the articular surface is left, must have had a diameter of about 1·9.
Mr. Boyd Dawkins has furnished me with the principal dimensions of several other femora, varying in length from 16 to 18 inches, and affording an average length of about 17, corresponding to a mean height of the individuals of about 5 ft. 4 in. to 5 ft. 5 in., the tallest being perhaps 5 ft. 6 in., and the shortest about 5 ft. 2 in., no doubt a woman. The mean perimetral index of the eight femora is ·186, which shows, in comparison with the usual thickness of well-formed male thigh-bones of the present day, a certain degree of slenderness. That this is not altogether owing to the circumstance that the bones include those of perhaps more than one female is proved by the fact that in no instance does the perimetral index exceed ·192, and in one thigh-bone, 18″·2 long, it is not more, if the circumference is correctly given, than ·178, the normal perimetral index for the adult male femur in this country being taken as about ·194.
(d.) Tibiæ.—Of the leg-bones brought under my notice, five are entire and five more or less defective. The principal dimensions and proportions of these bones, so far as they could be taken, are given in the subjoined Table.
[Table II.—Dimensions, &c., of Perthi-Chwareu Tibiæ.]
No. Length. Transverse
diameter,
proximal
end.Least
circum-
ference.Antero-
posterior
diameter and
transverse
diameter
of shaft.Perimetral
index.Latitudinal
index.1. 14·9 2·8 3·2 140 × 80 ·214 ·571 2. 13·7 2·7 2·9 120 - 75 ·211 ·625 3. 13·2 3·0 3·0 135 × 80 ·227 ·592 4. 12·9 2·5 2·5 125 × 70 ·193 ·541 5. 12·9 2·5 2·75 100 × 70 ·211 ·700 6. — — — 135 × 90 — ·666 7. — — — 140 × 90 — ·642 8. — — — 130 - 70 — ·538 9. — — — 135 × 85 — ·629 Mean. 13·5 2·7 2·86 129 × 79 ·211 ·611 In this Table the length means the extreme length of the bone as measured from the summit of the spinous process to the point of the internal malleolus; and the numbers in the fifth column represent the antero-posterior and the transverse diameter of the shaft at the point where the popliteal line terminates at the inner border of the bone, which is usually about an inch and a half below the nutritive foramen. The latitudinal index represents the relation that the transverse diameter bears to the antero posterior, and it is employed to indicate, with some degree of precision, the actual amount of compression or flattening of the shaft as compared with the normal form, which may, so far as my observations show, be taken for the ordinary English tibiæ as from ·700 or ·800, or in the mean at ·730, as will be seen in the subjoined Table, which contains the proportions of thirteen leg-bones taken indiscriminately from a drawer in the College of Surgeons.
[Table III.—Proportions, &c., of ordinary Tibiæ.]
No. Length. Transverse
diameter,
proximal
end.Least
circum-
ference.Antero-
posterior
diameter and
transverse
diameter
of shaft.Perimetral
index.Latitudinal
index.1. 16·7 3·15 3·4 130 × 100 ·202 ·769 2. 16·4 3·2 3·5 150 × 115 ·213 ·766 3. 15·8 2·95 3·0 120 × 90 ·189 ·750 4. 15·5 2·95 2·9 140 × 90 ·122 ·642 5. 15·3 2·9 2·8 130 × 90 ·150 ·692 6. 15·2 3·0 3·2 140 × 90 ·213 ·642 7. 15·0 2·8 2·8 140 × 90 ·187 ·642 8. 15·0 2·6 2·8 120 × 85 ·187 ·709 9. 15·0 2·6 2·8 120 × 90 ·187 ·782 10. 15·5 3·0 2·9 120 × 95 ·193 ·791 11. 13·5 2·8 2·9 120 × 90 ·214 ·750 12. 13·4 2·75 2·7 120 × 85 ·201 ·708 13. 12·8 2·5 2·4 100 × 85 ·187 ·850 Mean. 15·1 2·88 2·9 126 × 91 ·188 ·730 Comparison of the mean proportions given in the two Tables shows:—
(1) That the Perthi-Chwareu leg-bones are, on the whole, shorter, and absolutely smaller in all dimensions but one, viz. in the antero-posterior diameter of the shaft, which, notwithstanding the smaller size generally of the bones, is rather greater (that is to say, in the proportion of 129 to 126) than in the ordinary run of English tibiæ.
(2) That their perimetral index is greater, showing that, in proportion to their length, the Welsh bones are somewhat thicker, or in the proportion of 211 to 188.
(3) But the most marked difference is seen in the latitudinal index, which in the Perthi-Chwareu bones is ·611, and in those of the ordinary type ·730, varying in the former case from ·538 to ·700, and in the latter from ·642 to ·850; but the last is probably an exceptional case. In accordance with this, we find that the mean transverse diameter of the shaft at the point above indicated is greatly under the usual mark, viz. as 79 to 91.
It is clear, therefore, that the Perthi-Chwareu tibiæ are more compressed or flattened than the usual run of modern European tibiæ; in other words, they belong to the platycnemic type.
As this is, I believe, the first instance in which the occurrence of tibiæ of this peculiar conformation has been observed in this country, the circumstance is of some interest, especially with relation to the occurrence of priscan bones of the same type elsewhere.
This peculiar conformation of the tibia, to which we gave the name of “platycnemic,” was, I believe, first noticed by Dr. Falconer and myself, in 1863, in the human remains procured by Captain Brome from the Genista Cave, on Windmill Hill, Gibraltar, of which an account will be found in the Transactions of the International Congress of Prehistoric Archæology for the year 1868 (p. 161); and about the same time, or in May 1864, M. Broca[109] independently observed the same condition in tibiæ procured from the dolmen of Chamant (Oise), and afterwards in bones from the dolmen of Maintenon (Eure-et-Loire). Similar bones have since been noticed in other localities on the Continent, as, for instance, in the diluvium of Montmartre, by M. Eugène Bertrand. But that the peculiarity in question is not common in all the varieties of priscan man belonging to the reindeer period is shown by the fact that it has not been observed in any of the tibiæ exhumed by M. Dupont in the Belgian caves.
M. Broca’s almost exhaustive remarks upon the anatomical, physiological, and pathological relations of this form of tibia leave but little to be said under those heads. I would, however, venture to add a few words as to its ethnological significance. But before doing so I would remark that there appear to be two forms of platycnemism, apparently indicative of some difference in the cause or nature of this aberration from the more usual shape of the bone. To save many words, I subjoin outlines of several well-marked instances of platycnemic bones, all drawn of the natural size and in the same position, the letter (a) in each corresponding to the interosseous ridge, and (b) to the crista or shin.
The line b c, drawn through the crista and the middle of the posterior surface of the bone, is bisected by another (a d), drawn at right angles to it, at the level of the interosseous ridge.
In [Fig. 47], which represents what may be regarded as a normal tibia, the length of that portion of the antero-posterior line which is behind the transverse line is to that of the anterior as 274 to 1,000, whilst in [Fig. 48], taken from M. Broca’s outline of the Cro-magnon tibia, which would seem to represent the extremest degree of platycnemism as yet observed, the proportion in question is as 623 to 1,000.
Figs. 47, 48.
Figs. 49, 50, 51.
Figs. 49, 50, 51, are taken from as many of the Gibraltar tibiæ,[110] in which the proportion varies from 600 to 523, whilst it will be observed that in [Figs. 52, 53, 54], taken from the most platycnemic of the Perthi-Chwareu tibiæ, the proportion in one only differs in any considerable degree from the extreme normal proportion shown in [Fig. 47]; and in this it is as 512 to 1,000, whilst in [Fig. 53], which is nevertheless undoubtedly platycnemic, the proportion is exactly the same as in the most triangular form of bone.
It would seem, therefore, that platycnemism may arise from an unusual antero-posterior expansion of the bone, either in front or behind the level of the interosseous ridge. What this difference may indicate, or of what importance it may be in the consideration of questions relating to platycnemism, I am not prepared to discuss; but as in all probability it is connected with a difference in the cause of the deformation (if it be deformation), I have thought that the observation should be recorded, and would merely, in addition, remark that, so far as I have noticed, the occasional and not infrequent platycnemism observed in the shin-bones of negroes is what may be termed anterior.
Figs. 52, 53, 54.
With respect to the ethnological value of the platycnemic tibia, I conceive we are as yet very much in the dark. That it is a race-character would seem to me in the highest degree improbable, seeing that it would be difficult to find any other points of resemblance between the Cro-magnon platycnemic men and those whose remains were met with in the Gibraltar caves, although the platycnemism is of the same kind in each; and still less could the former gigantic race be identified with the occupants of the Perthi-Chwareu sepulchre, from whom they differ not only in stature, but even more remarkably in cranial conformation.
If, then, platycnemism cannot be regarded as of any value as a race-character, it can a fortiori be still less looked upon as indicative of simian tendencies, a notion that M. Broca seems somewhat inclined to favour. It is quite true that the tibiæ of the gorilla and of the chimpanzee are, to a certain extent, platycnemic; but it is by no means so much so as the human platycnemic bone. The tibia of a male gorilla in the College of Surgeons has a latitudinal index of ·681, and that of a female of ·650, whilst that of the chimpanzee is ·611, or exactly the mean of the Perthi-Chwareu bones. It is needless to insist upon the other marked distinctions between the simian and the human tibia; but as regards platycnemism it will be obvious, if we are disposed to trace it to any genetic descent, that the descendant has, in this respect, at one time far out-simianized the Simiæ.
But this comparison with the anthropoid apes may, perhaps, afford ground for a suggestion respecting some possible connection between this peculiar form of the tibia and the habits of the people amongst whom it has been observed. One great distinction between the human and the simian foot consists in their respective adaptations to totally distinct functions. In the one case it is simply an organ of support and progression; in the other, for the most part, of prehension. This necessarily involves a considerable difference in the proportions, &c., of the muscles by which the greater mobility and adaptability of the foot, and more particularly of the digits, are ensured. Would it not, then, be admissible to inquire how far, at any rate, posterior platycnemism may be connected with the greater freedom of motion and general adaptability of the toes enjoyed by those peoples whose feet have not been subjected to the confinement of shoes or other coverings, and who at the same time have been compelled to lead an active existence in a rude and rugged or mountainous and wooded country, where the exigencies of the chase would demand the utmost agility in climbing and otherwise?
Some common cause of this kind would seem to be not improbable; and it would not, perhaps, be difficult to ascertain whether it is a vera causa or not. But, with respect to this, observations are at present wanting.
From the foregoing data we may conclude:—
(1) That the Perthi-Chwareu bones belonged to a race characterized by the proportionally rather large dimensions of the cranium, whose form presents nothing very remarkable, and is pretty nearly conformable to several of those found by Mr. Laing in the ancient shell-mounds in Shetland.[111]
(2) That this form is distinctly different from that of the Mewslade skull, in which the vertical region is somewhat flattened, as is the case also with several Anglesey crania, which, however, appear to pass, by gradual transition, into the Keiss and Perthi-Chwareu shape, through such a form as that of the Towyn-y-capel skull figured by Professor Huxley;[112] and the whole of them consequently may be regarded as belonging to the so-called “River-bed skulls” of that author, excepting the Borris cranium, which appears to belong to a different type altogether.
(3) That the people whose remains were found in this locality were of low stature (the mean height, deduced from the lengths of the long bones, being little more than 5 feet), the tallest being 5 ft. 6 in., and the shortest adult not more than 4 ft. 10 in., the intermediate ones being 5 ft. 1 in. and 5 ft. 2 in.
(4) That the proportions of the long bones are rather thick, and the muscular impressions in all are very strongly marked.
(5) That the tibiæ are, for the most part, of a much more compressed form than those of the modern English, but that this platycnemism does not appear to be exactly of the same kind as that which is exhibited in the Gibraltar bones and in those from Cro-magnon (as figured by M. Broca), the difference consisting in the fact that in the two latter instances the bone is expanded backwards behind the transverse plane at the interosseous ridge as much as it is in front of that plane, whilst in the Welsh tibiæ it is the anterior portion of the shaft only which is expanded; or, in other words, the platycnemism in them is due simply to an absolute compression of the shaft.
§ 3. Human Remains from the Cefn Tumulus.
These remains, as submitted to my inspection, consist of:—
(1) Portions of three frontal bones, two of which are nearly complete, and one constituted of little more than the superciliary region.
(2) Two parietals and a left temporal, probably belonging to the same skull as the more mutilated frontal.
(3) Portions of four thigh-bones, two left and two right, one of the latter wanting the proximal, the other both extremities.
We have thus the remains of three individuals from this interment.
I. The Frontal Bones.—No. 1. The least transverse diameter, immediately behind the external angular processes, is 3″·6, and its greatest (at the coronal suture) about 4″·3. Longitudinal arc, 4″·1. The profile outline of the forehead is slightly receding; the frontal sinuses moderately developed; and the supraorbital border thin and acute, whilst the glabellar eminence is large and prominent. The bone is a good deal compressed on the sides, so as to have almost the appearance of having formed part of a cymbecephalic skull. The bone itself is thin, and probably without any diploë.
No. 2 presents exactly the same characters, except that the longitudinal arc is greater, being 5″·3. The postorbital or least transverse diameter is 3″·4, and the coronal or greatest 4″·4. The frontal sinuses are well developed; the supraorbital ridge rather prominent, but thin and sharp; the external angular process prominent and thick. Glabellar eminence large and prominent. The nasals remain in situ, and project almost, if not quite, horizontally forwards, with a rapid curve at first, and then straight out. The general contour of the bone is exactly like that of No. 1, in which also, although the nasals are wanting, the position of the surface by which they were attached shows that they must in all probability have resembled those of No. 2. The crista galli of the ethmoid, which is left in situ, is remarkably thick and high.
No. 3 is a portion of a larger and wider bone, the postorbital diameter being at least 4″·0. The frontal sinuses are very large, but distinctly defined, as the remainder of the supraorbital border is not thickened. Owing perhaps to the greater prominence of the sinuses, the glabella does not appear so protuberant as in the other instances. The nasal bones remain and project forwards in the same curious fashion as in No. 2. The frontal crest on the inner surface is remarkably developed, being at least half an inch high, though it is separated by a wide notch from the equally strongly developed crista galli of the ethmoid.
No. 4, when the three bones of which it is composed are put together, consists of the greater part of the parietal region of the skull, to which, as before said, the last-described frontal may have belonged. The left parietal is quite perfect; and a considerable portion of the right also remains, together with the entire left temporal; so that a very sufficient estimate of the proportions of the parietal region of the skull can be obtained.
As well as can be estimated, the parietal longitudinal arc, or length of the sagittal suture, is 5″·2. The vertical transverse arc, or that drawn from one auditory foramen to the other, over the point of junction of the coronal and sagittal sutures, is 12″·2, the parietal 13″, and the occipital 12″·2. In the temporal bone, the external auditory foramen is large, the mastoid process of moderate size, but the digastric fossa is wide and deep. The channels for the middle meningeal artery and its branches are large and deep; and very deep depressions on the sides of the sagittal suture show that the glandulæ Pacchioni must have been greatly developed. The bone is very thin, and with scarcely a trace of diploë where its structure is visible. None of the sutures, however, which are strongly serrated, are in the slightest degree closed, although, as I should imagine, the skull must have been that of a man beyond the middle period of life.
II. The Thigh-bones.—Two of these bones, which, though much alike, differ sufficiently to show that they did not belong to the same individual, are decidedly carinate.
No. 1 wants the upper and lower ends. The least circumference of the shaft, which is at a point about 3½ inches below the trochanter minor, is 3″·2. That process, as well as all the other muscular impressions, is strongly developed; and that for the insertion of the gluteus maximus is peculiar in presenting the form of a deep elongated pit instead of a roughened elevation as usual. The antero-posterior and transverse diameters of the shaft, about 1½ inches below the trochanter minor, are ·85 × 1·4; and the shaft at this part, like that of the above-described from Perthi-Chwareu, presents a rather acute or narrow external and internal border instead of the usual more rounded form. Lower down, the shaft becomes strongly carinate; and, owing to the flattened form of the anterior surface, its transverse section affords a subtriangular figure ([fig. 55]). The walls, or cortical substance, are rather thicker than usual, and the substance of the bone is dense and hard.
Fig. 55.
Fig. 56.
No. 2 is very similar in character to the foregoing, but is not quite so much compressed in the upper part, measuring ·8 × 1·2. Nevertheless the inner border is very acute, and the outer more so than in the common form of femur. The shaft lower down is not so strongly carinate as it is in the former instance, but is still so in some degree ([Fig. 56]); and the walls (or cortical substance) are still thicker in proportion.
Fig. 57.
Fig. 58.
No. 3. A third specimen consists of the lower half, or rather more, of the right femur. The least circumference is 3″·2. The bone exhibits no special external characters, and is in no degree carinated. The shaft, at about the middle of its length, is somewhat angular in front; and the pit for the origin of the popliteus muscle is deeper and perhaps larger than in most bones of the same size. The texture of the cortical substance is quite eburneous; and it is extremely thick, so that the medullary canal is reduced to a calibre of little more than 0″·25 in its longest diameter. The shaft, however, is straight, and exhibits no other sign whatever of having been affected with rachitis. It is, however, a curious circumstance that many of the Gibraltar thigh-bones, most of which are carinate, present the same thickening of the cortical substance ([Fig. 57]).
No. 4. A fourth specimen is constituted of merely a portion of the shaft, about 12 inches long, and without either extremity. Its least diameter is 3″·3, and its antero-posterior and transverse diameters, at the same point as in the other bones, 1 × 1·25, or pretty nearly in the usual proportions. Nevertheless the bone, throughout its whole remaining extent, is less rounded on the inner side of the shaft than is usual. The trochanter minor is of gigantic size; and the shaft of the bone, about and below the middle, exhibits a subtriangular aspect ([Fig. 58]), though scarcely to be called carinate. The cortical substance is of the normal thickness.
III. Tibiæ.—No. 1 consists of the greater portion of the left tibia, wanting only the lower extremity. The proximal end measures 2·9 × 1·9; and the diameters of the shaft, about the middle, are 1·2 × ·75, giving a latitudinal index of ·620. The shin is remarkably sharp and prominent, and rather curved over to the outer side; and the apparent compression or tendency to platycnemism may in some measure be referred more to the production in front of the anterior part of the bone than to actual narrowing of the posterior side of the triangle, which is nevertheless rather more rounded than in most cases. The axis of the shaft is quite straight; and the bone has not the least rickety appearance.
No. 2 is also a portion of the left tibia. Both extremities are wanting, and the bone offers nothing worthy of remark. Its least circumference is 2″·65; and the shaft, at the middle, measures 1″·1 × ·65; so that the latitudinal index is about ·640, showing a slight degree of compression. The entire length of the bone may be estimated as rather more than 13 inches, corresponding to a height of about 5 ft. 4 in. or 5 ft. 5 in., so that the subject may be supposed to have been a female.
These remains represent at least four individuals—one probably somewhat aged, another of strong and robust make, and one, in all probability, a woman—in fact, a family group. No correct idea can be formed of the cranial conformation of these persons. In general shape it would seem to correspond with that of the Perthi-Chwareu skulls; but two of them at any rate are of smaller size, if we may judge from the least frontal diameter. The forehead also is perhaps a little more reclined. The most striking feature in two of the specimens, and which appears also to have existed in a third, is the extraordinary projection forwards of the nasal bones. In the present case this may probably be regarded as a family peculiarity; but with reference to it, it should be remembered that M. Broca[113] has described a very similar condition in the skull of the “Old man” of Cro-magnon, in whom, he says, “the ridge of the nose, slightly depressed at its base, rises again almost immediately, and advances boldly forward, making a rapid curve, with the concavity directed rather forward and especially upward, so that the lower ends of the ossa nasi are placed 18 mm. (·7 inch) in front of a line dropped vertically from the fronto-nasal suture.”
The condition of the bones from the Cefn tumulus differs very considerably from that of the remains from Perthi-Chwareu. They all have an appearance of much greater antiquity. With the exception of the very dense femur, they adhere to the tongue; and they are all deeply stained with manganous oxide, by which the substance even of the hardest portions is stained to a depth of more than one-eighth of an inch. That this discoloration, which for the most part does not assume the dendritic appearance, is due to manganese and not to any vegetable stain, is quite certain.
The form of the skull, so far as it can be ascertained from such imperfect remains, and the rather platycnemic shape of the tibiæ, may perhaps justify our supposing that the Cefn bones belong to a cognate race to those whose remains were deposited at Perthi-Chwareu, or to one which had lived under similar conditions. But the cranial data are hardly sufficient to allow of any satisfactory inference being drawn from them: and as regards the tibiæ, it has already been pointed out that platycnemism cannot, in the present state of our knowledge, be regarded as an important ethnological character amongst priscan peoples, though it may undoubtedly be considered a character betokening remote antiquity.
§ 4. Skull from the Cefn Cave, near St. Asaph.
The only specimen of human remains from this locality is a nearly entire calvaria, wanting the whole of the face below the superciliary border.
In the middle of the left parietal bone is a small irregular opening, with short radiating lines of fracture proceeding from it; but this appears to have been recently caused, and from the inside.
The bone generally is of a brown colour, and, as regards firmness, in a natural condition; and it does not adhere to the tongue. Judging from its aspect alone, it would not appear to be of any very great antiquity; but as it has lain in a dry soil, and sheltered from rain or moisture, this appearance may be deceptive.
Its dimensions are given in [Table I]. (supra), from which it will be seen that the cephalic or latitudinal index is ·770, and the altitudinal ·702. It belongs, therefore, to the category of subbrachy-cephalic skulls of Thurnam and Professor Huxley.
Figs. 59, 60, 61.—Skull from Cave at Cefn, St. Asaph.
In the side view (norma lateralis—Plate 7, [Fig. 59]), it so closely resembles, except in one respect, that described and figured by Professor Huxley (loc. cit. p. 125, [Figs. 60, 61]) from the bed of the Nore, at Borris, in Ireland, that we can scarcely refuse to recognize a common character between them, which, since in the present case it cannot be looked upon as denoting a mere family relationship, may reasonably be regarded as indicative of some affinity of race. The chief difference observable in this view of the two skulls is the greater development of the frontal sinuses in the Borris calvaria. The occipital view (norma occipitalis, Fig. 8 is also very similar, except that in the Borris skull the greatest width appears to be in the temporal, and in the other the parietal region. In the Borris skull, also, there is a shallow groove in the course of the sagittal suture, which does not exist in that from St. Asaph.
The Borris skull is said to be of the extraordinary length of 8 inches; and this may account for the much lower cephalic index of the skull, whose absolute width in reality somewhat exceeds the Cefn specimen (5″·9 and 5″·7), whilst the altitudinal as compared with the latitudinal is but very little greater than it would be were the skulls reduced to the same breadth. They may both, therefore, be regarded as “low,” or, as this class of skull might be termed, in the euphonious language of craniologists, “tapinocephalic.” One great peculiarity of the Cefn cranium (which exists also, but apparently not to quite so great a degree, in the other) is the absolute horizontality of the plane of the subinial portion of the occipital bone. And it is to this flattening that the comparative lowness may perhaps be chiefly attributed.
The sutures, where visible, appear to be open. The mastoid processes and all other muscular impressions are strongly marked.
A third skull of very similar character, except that it is not so much depressed, has come under my observation. It was discovered in a submarine or, rather, subterranean peat-bed or ancient forest, 30 feet below the sea-level, at Sennen, near the Land’s End, in Cornwall; and a brief notice and outline figure of it will be found in the “Natural History Review” for 1861.[114] The Sennen skull has the same elongated form; but it is higher than either the Cefn, St. Asaph, or Borris crania, having an altitudinal index of ·730.
On the whole, these three skulls (i.e. those from Borris, Sennen, and St. Asaph) would appear to have a common character, and to be of a different type from either the Perthi-Chwareu or the Mewslade form.
As a rule it may, I think, be stated that in all brachy-cephalic skulls the breadth exceeds the height, whilst the reverse is the case in the dolicho-cephalic. Individual exceptions are of course not unfrequently met with, more especially among very mixed races, such as the modern English; but I am myself acquainted with only two dolicho-cephalic races, properly so termed, in which the rule does not hold good. These are the Tasmanian (not Australian) and the Bushman.
Any exceptions, therefore, to either rule among ancient and, consequently, less mixed races are worthy of being noted.
As regards modern brachy-cephalic skulls the law holds almost universally, the only marked exception, except in an individual here and there, being in two Karén skulls, in which, although both decidedly brachy-cephalic, the respective indices stand as ·848 to ·924, and as ·790 to ·842.
Among priscan brachy-cephalic skulls the most remarkable and important exceptions I have met with occur among the neolithic crania in the Copenhagen Museum, more than half of which are brachy-cephalic, and most of the others nearly so, the mean cephalic index of 21 skulls being ·790, whilst the mean altitudinal is as high as ·810. In fact, out of 12 skulls whose indices vary from ·795 to ·838, no fewer than 10 have the latitudinal index less than the altitudinal.
The exceptions to the rule as applied to dolicho-cephalic skulls also appear to be far more common among the ancient than among the modern, excepting the two races I have above referred to.
In a long list of ancient and priscan skulls, I find the following having the tapino-cephalic character:—
L. Ind. Alt. Ind. 1. From the Thames alluvium at Old Ford ·792 ·753 2. From the same deposit at East Ham ·774 ·690 3. From the same deposit at Battersea ·763 ·745 4. From the same deposit at London Bridge ·762 ·611 5. From tumulus at Stanshope ·763 ·684 6. A Guanche skull ·775 ·737 7. A Guanche skull ·763 ·684 8. Cefn, St. Asaph’s ·770 ·702 The number is but small, it must be confessed, and perhaps hardly sufficient to do more than prove the rule; but still I think it will be found worth inquiry whether a departure from the rule in question was more frequent among the unmixed or little-mixed races of ancient times than it is amongst similarly unmixed races of the present day; and whether consequently its infraction in a considerable number of instances may or may not be indicative of a lower type, as which we are accustomed to regard the Tasmanian and Bushman races.
| No. | Length. | Breadth. | Height. | Least frontal breadth. | Greatest frontal breadth. | Parietal breadth. | Occipital breadth. | Zygomatic breadth. | Frontal radius. | Vertical radius. | Parietal radius. | Occipital radius. | Maxillary radius. | Fronto-nasal radius. | Circum- ference. | Longi- tudinal arc. | (a) Frontal. | (b) Parietal. | (c) Occipital. | Frontal transverse arc. | Vertical transverse arc. | Parietal transverse arc. | Occipital transverse arc. | Latitudinal or cephalic index. | Altitudinal index. |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1. | 7·5 | 5·7 | — | 4·0 | 5·0 | 5·5 | 4·6 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 21·2 | — | 5·0 | 5·5 | — | 12·0 | 13·0 | 14·0 | 12·0 | ·760 | — |
| 2. | 7·6 | 5·7 | 5·4 | 4·0 | 4·9 | 5·5 | 4·8 | — | 4·9 | 5·0 | 5·2 | 4·4 | — | 3·7 | 21·6 | 15·9 | 5·5 | 5·6 | 4·8 | 13·0 | 13·5 | 13·8 | 12·4 | ·750 | ·710 |
| 3. | 6·5 | 5·2 | 5·5 | 3·4 | 4·5 | 5·1 | 4·1 | 3·9 | 4·2 | 4·5 | 4·7 | 4·1 | 3·2 | 3·0 | 19·0 | 14·7 | 4·9 | 5·3 | 4·5 | 11·6 | 12·45 | 13·4 | 11·2 | ·800 | ·846 |
| 4. | 7·4 | 5·8 | 5·8 | 3·9 | 5·0 | 5·8 | 4·4 | 4·7 | 4·4 | 4·6 | 4·7 | 4·3 | 3·9 | 3·6 | 23·5 | 16·9 | 5·0 | 5·0 | 6·? | 11·0 | 13·0 | 14·0 | 12·0 | ·797 | ·797 |
| 5. | 6·7 | 5·0 | — | 3·5 | 4·4 | 5·4 | 4·1 | — | 4·0 | 4·3 | 4·6 | 4·0 | — | — | 18·5 | — | 4·4 | 5·2 | — | 11·0 | 12·5 | 13·4 | — | ·746 | — |
| 6. | 6·8 | 5·4 | — | 3·6 | 4·3 | 5·3 | 4·0 | — | 4·3 | 4·5 | 4·8 | 4·2 | — | — | 19·8 | 14·6 | 4·8 | 5·3 | 4·5 | 14·0 | 12·0 | 13·0 | 11·0 | ·794 | — |
| 7. | — | 5·5 | — | — | — | 5·3 | — | — | — | — | 4·6 | 4·0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 8. | 7·0 | 5·2 | — | 3·6 | 4·4 | 5·2 | 4·1 | — | 4·1 | 4·3 | 4·5 | 4·1 | — | 3·4 | 19·5 | — | 4·5 | 4·9 | 4·8 | 11·0 | 11·5 | 13·0 | 12·0 | ·743 | — |
| Mean[A] | 7·07 | 5·5 | 5·6 | 3·8 | 4·64 | 5·4 | 4·3 | — | 4·3 | 4·5 | 4·7 | 4·2 | 3·5 | 3·42 | 20·0 | 15·3 | 4·9 | 5·2 | 5·0 | 12·0 | 12·5 | 13·5 | 11·8 | ·765[A] | — |
| Cefn Cave | 7·4 | 5·7 | 5·2 | 3·8 | 4·7 | 5·5 | 4·8 | — | 4·6 | 4·6 | 4·7 | 4·0 | — | 3·8 | 21.0 | 15·1 | 5·0 | 5·5 | 4·6 | 12·2 | 12·8 | 13·8 | 12·0 | ·770 | ·702 |
| Cefn Tumulus | 7·38 | 5·65 | — | 3·6 | 4·5 | 5·55 | — | — | 4·5 | 4·6 | 4·9 | 4·5 | — | 3·6 | — | — | 5·2 | 5·2 | — | 12·4 | 12·4 | 12·8 | 10·9 | ·765 | — |
| Ditto | 7·2 | 5·6 | 5·7 | 3·6 | 4·35 | 5·5 | 4·35 | 4·6 | 4·45 | 4·8 | 4·9 | 4·3 | — | 3·7 | 20·1 | — | 5·0 | 5·0 | 4·9 | 12·0 | 13·1 | 13·25 | 11·5 | — | — |
| 7·5 | 5·4 | 5·9 | 4·0 | 4·6 | 5·35 | 4·35 | 4·9 | 5·0 | 5·0 | 5·05 | 4·35 | 4·2 | 4·2 | 20·9 | — | 4·9 | 5·6 | 4·6 | 12·8 | 13·25 | 13·25 | 10·5 | — | — | |
| Genista Cave, Gibraltar | 7·95 | 5·5 | 5·7 | 3·9 | 5·0 | 5·4 | 4·45 | 5·2 | 4·7 | 4·8 | 4·9 | 4·25 | 4·1 | 3·75 | 20·6 | 14·0 | 5·2 | 4·8 | 4·0 | 12·5 | 13·2 | 13·3 | 11·4 | ·748 | ·714 |
| Ditto | 7·35 | 5·6 | 6·1 | 3·8 | 4·9 | 5·4 | 4·5 | 5·2 | 4·75 | 4·9 | 5·1 | 4·9 | 4·0 | 3·65 | 20·8 | 15·3 | 4·8 | 5·6 | 4·9 | 12·3 | 13·2 | 13·3 | 11·6 | ·761 | ·889 |
| No. | Length. | Transverse diameter, proximal end. | Least circum- ference. | Antero- posterior diameter and transverse diameter of shaft. | Perimetral index. | Latitudinal index. |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1. | 14·9 | 2·8 | 3·2 | 140 × 80 | ·214 | ·571 |
| 2. | 13·7 | 2·7 | 2·9 | 120 - 75 | ·211 | ·625 |
| 3. | 13·2 | 3·0 | 3·0 | 135 × 80 | ·227 | ·592 |
| 4. | 12·9 | 2·5 | 2·5 | 125 × 70 | ·193 | ·541 |
| 5. | 12·9 | 2·5 | 2·75 | 100 × 70 | ·211 | ·700 |
| 6. | — | — | — | 135 × 90 | — | ·666 |
| 7. | — | — | — | 140 × 90 | — | ·642 |
| 8. | — | — | — | 130 - 70 | — | ·538 |
| 9. | — | — | — | 135 × 85 | — | ·629 |
| Mean. | 13·5 | 2·7 | 2·86 | 129 × 79 | ·211 | ·611 |
| No. | Length. | Transverse diameter, proximal end. | Least circum- ference. | Antero- posterior diameter and transverse diameter of shaft. | Perimetral index. | Latitudinal index. |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1. | 16·7 | 3·15 | 3·4 | 130 × 100 | ·202 | ·769 |
| 2. | 16·4 | 3·2 | 3·5 | 150 × 115 | ·213 | ·766 |
| 3. | 15·8 | 2·95 | 3·0 | 120 × 90 | ·189 | ·750 |
| 4. | 15·5 | 2·95 | 2·9 | 140 × 90 | ·122 | ·642 |
| 5. | 15·3 | 2·9 | 2·8 | 130 × 90 | ·150 | ·692 |
| 6. | 15·2 | 3·0 | 3·2 | 140 × 90 | ·213 | ·642 |
| 7. | 15·0 | 2·8 | 2·8 | 140 × 90 | ·187 | ·642 |
| 8. | 15·0 | 2·6 | 2·8 | 120 × 85 | ·187 | ·709 |
| 9. | 15·0 | 2·6 | 2·8 | 120 × 90 | ·187 | ·782 |
| 10. | 15·5 | 3·0 | 2·9 | 120 × 95 | ·193 | ·791 |
| 11. | 13·5 | 2·8 | 2·9 | 120 × 90 | ·214 | ·750 |
| 12. | 13·4 | 2·75 | 2·7 | 120 × 85 | ·201 | ·708 |
| 13. | 12·8 | 2·5 | 2·4 | 100 × 85 | ·187 | ·850 |
| Mean. | 15·1 | 2·88 | 2·9 | 126 × 91 | ·188 | ·730 |
| L. Ind. | Alt. Ind. | |
|---|---|---|
| 1. From the Thames alluvium at Old Ford | ·792 | ·753 |
| 2. From the same deposit at East Ham | ·774 | ·690 |
| 3. From the same deposit at Battersea | ·763 | ·745 |
| 4. From the same deposit at London Bridge | ·762 | ·611 |
| 5. From tumulus at Stanshope | ·763 | ·684 |
| 6. A Guanche skull | ·775 | ·737 |
| 7. A Guanche skull | ·763 | ·684 |
| 8. Cefn, St. Asaph’s | ·770 | ·702 |
General Conclusions as to Human Remains.
The human remains in the caves of Perthi-Chwareu and Cefn, and in the cairn near the latter place, imply that the men to which they belonged were a short race, the tallest being about 5 feet 6 inches, and the shortest 4 feet 10 inches.[115] Their skulls are orthognathic,[116] or not presenting a lower jaw advancing beyond the vertical line dropped from the forehead; in shape ortho-cephalic, or subbrachy-cephalous, and of fair average capacity. The face was oval and the cheek-bones were not prominent. Some of the individuals were characterised by the peculiar flattening of shin (platycnemism), which probably stood in relation to the free action of the foot that was not impeded by the use of a rigid sole or sandal. This character, however, is neither peculiar to race, nor to be viewed as a tendency towards the simian type of leg. These conclusions, which Professor Busk has arrived at from the examination of the remains which were submitted to him, have been fully borne out by the numerous skeletons which have been subsequently discovered, both in the sepulchral caves at Rhosdigre and in a second chamber in the cairn of Tyddyn Bleiddyn near Cefn.