[56] For a discussion on these early cases of supposed polyandry see Dr. J. Muir, Indian Antiquary, VI., 260, sqq.: E. Thomas, ibid., VI., 275: Rig Veda, I., 119, 5: Wilson, Essays, II., 340: Max Müller, History of Ancient Sanskrit Literature, 44, sqq.: Westminster Review, 1868, page 412: Lang, Custom and Myth, II., 155. [↑]

[57] Jummoo, 250. [↑]

[58] Abode of Snow., 231. For Tibetan Polyandry generally see C. Horne, Indian Antiquary, V., 164: C. R. Stulpnagel, ibid., VII., 132, sqq.: Yule, Marco Polo, II., 33, 38, 40: Williams, Memo of Dehra Dûn, 175. [↑]

[59] Lassen, Ind. Alterthumsk., 2nd Edition, II., 454. [↑]

[60] Briggs, Translation, I., 183, sq. [↑]

[61] Ghulâm Bâsit: Dowson’s Elliot, History, VIII., 202. [↑]

[62] Kirkpatrick, Indian Antiquary, VII., 86, sq. [↑]

[63] Studies, 112, sqq. [↑]

[64] Rig Veda, X., 40, 2; and Muir’s remarks, Ancient Sanskrit Texts, V., 459. [↑]

[65] Institutes, IX., 59, 62; with Muir’s comment, Indian Antiquary, VI., 315. [↑]