[585]. Survey of London (Kingsford’s edn.), II., p. 90.
[586]. Historia Anglicana, p. 176b.
[587]. Parton in his transcription of the document reads “forty” throughout, and has been copied by everybody. It is, however, clearly “quatuordecim” in all cases.
[588]. Ancient Petitions, E. 617.
[589]. Ancient Petitions, E. 617; 2448.
[590]. Calendar of Letterbooks of the City of London, Letterbook G., p. 28.
[591]. Ibid., p. 29.
[592]. I.e., 27 Edw. I. (Calendar of Patent Rolls, p. 404). It has been generally assumed that the date was 1354, i.e., 27 Edw. III., no doubt because Parton (Hospital and Parish of St. Giles, pp. 23, 26) when translating the document relating to the suit between the Abbot of St. Mary Graces and the Master of Burton Lazars gave the name of the King as Edward the son of Edward, whereas the reading is clearly “Edward the son of Henry.”
[593]. It really extended somewhat to the west of the eastern side of the modern road, which has been formed by widening the ancient Hog Lane.
[594]. Close Roll, 16 James I. (2384).—Indenture, dated 19 March, 1617–8, between Robert Lloyd and Isaac Bringhurst.