The mean of all the seven estimates put forward above, as approximations only, is about 50,000, which is probably below rather than above the actual number in normal times. The estimates differ so widely, however, as to shake one's faith in the possibility of arriving at a safe figure except by a special census on even more comprehensive lines than those which underlay the Home Office enumerations up to 1868.

But even when the casual wards, model lodging-houses, shelters, and other resorts of the roaming poor have been enumerated, the full extent of the vagrant population is not told.

According to a statement made by the Prison Commissioners to the Vagrancy Committee, 3,736 out of 12,369 convicted male prisoners on February 28, 1905, were, in the opinion of the prison governors, "persons with no fixed place of abode and no regular means of subsistence"; and of 2,595 convicted female prisoners, 372 answered the same description. In other words, one-fourth of the prison population belonged at that date to the vagrant and loafing class.

The prosecutions in England and Wales for vagrancy offences in the narrower sense—begging, sleeping out, misbehaviour by paupers, and theft or destruction of workhouse clothes—fluctuated as follows during the ten years 1898-1907:—

Year. Begging.Sleeping-out.Misdemeanour by Paupers.Theft or Destruction of Workhouse Clothes.
1898 15,474 9,582 3,769 589
189912,6598,5153,632615
190011,3397,4523,717457
190114,4929,1015,118576
190216,1849,5985,959726
190319,28310,3496,496841
190423,03611,7857,436937
190526,38612,6366,3141,005
190625,08311,5405,1761,016
190723,02311,1644,633852

At whatever figure we place the vagrant population, there is little doubt that the number tends to increase. The Vagrancy Committee frankly accept this view.

"The army of vagrants has increased in number of late years," they state, "and there is reason to fear that it will continue to increase if things are left as they are. It is mainly composed of those who deliberately avoid any work, and depend for their existence on almsgiving and the casual wards; and for their benefit the industrious portion of the community is heavily taxed. We are convinced that the present system of treating casual paupers neither deters the vagrant nor affords any means of reclaiming him, and we are unanimously of opinion that a thorough reform is necessary."[10]

As to the class of men who frequent the casual wards the great mass, both in town and country, are unquestionably unskilled labourers, though nearly all trades contribute a share, larger or smaller, to the sum total of vagrancy. A classification of the men relieved in the casual wards of Hitchin and Brixworth during twelve months ending September, 1906, showed the following result:—[11]

Occupations.Hitchin.Brixworth.
Labourers 3,830 222
Painters22614
Grooms15712
Bricklayers14413
Shoemakers13313
Fitters1239
Rivetters123
Boilermakers123
Tailors1085
Carpenters and joiners1069
Printers and compositors74
Stokers, firemen, etc.703
Seamen604
Moudlers and drillers58
Gardeners37
Clerks36
Engineers34
Bakers33
Harnessmakers and saddlers31
Porters27
Blacksmiths, etc.25
Sawyers25
Plasterers24
Plasterers22
Silversmiths3
Other trades44616
Total5,829322