Fig. 74.

In the above treatment of the application of centre strengthening girders there is a source of error which should be touched upon. If, under live load, the centre girder deflects more than the outer girders, as it commonly will, there must be a want of uniformity in the behaviour of the cross-girders, those near the abutments being more relieved than the estimated amount of relief of those at the centre, which will have less than that intended; but the reduction of stress in the cross-girders will generally be so considerable that any such ambiguity of excess or defect is commonly unimportant; the effect of this also upon the main girders is much less than might be supposed, being, for the third of the cases just given, about 212 per cent. excess for the centre girder, and generally a much smaller error. With this qualification, the method can, however, be regarded as approximate only. It is possible to eliminate some part of the error by lifting the end cross-girders during adjustment, a less amount than that given by the diagrams, [Figs. 73] and [74], taking care that the centre girder is depressed its full amount by lifting the centre cross-girders a little more; this refinement is hardly necessary, and unless controlled by calculation cannot be depended upon for precise results.

Particulars are here given of five ordinary cases, comparing the calculated and observed results of adjustment. The operation of levelling was conducted by a quick-eyed and capable assistant, who was not made acquainted with the results expected, in order to avoid any sub-conscious tendency to match the calculated figures:—

Examples of Centre Girder Adjustments.

Calculated.Observed.
in.in.
No. 1.—56-Ft. Span.
Depression of centre girder·82·84
Lift of cross-girders at centre·23·22
Lift of outer girders·20·10 and ·13
No. 2.—57-Ft. Span.
Depression of centre girder·50·50
Lift of cross-girders at centre·18·20
Lift of outer girders·11·08 and ·10
No. 3.—67-Ft. Span.
Depression of centre girder·70·75
Lift of cross-girders at centre·15·17
Lift of outer girders·10·09
No. 4.—68-Ft. Span.
Depression of centre girder·70·65
Lift of cross-girders at centre·20·18
Lift of outer girders·13·14
No. 5.—52-Ft. and 28-Ft. Spans continuous.
Long
Span.
Short
Span.
Long
Span.
Short
Span.
in.in.in.in.
Depression of centre girder·28..·29..
Lift of centre girder..·04..·03
Lift of cross-girders (centre of spans)·17·09·15·13
Lift of outer girders·08..·08..
Depression of outer girder..·01..negli-
gible.

The method of calculation adopted for these cases was not precisely that given, though depending upon the same broad principles. The first cannot be considered a good example. The last, having continuous girders, of course needed special treatment.

Of about seventeen bridges strengthened in the manner described, the effect generally was satisfactory, in reducing deflection and vibration; but in two cases of small span, owing probably to settlement of bedstones, the results were not so good.

From first to last the work of putting in a centre girder takes some little time, owing to the slow progress generally made in fixing the brackets, preparing packings, etc. The cost of a typical case was about 23 per cent. of the cost of a new superstructure, with a 30 per cent. relief of stress.