[500] Priestley, op. cit. p. xxx.
[501] Review of Bains's Psychology, by J.S. Mill, in Edinb. Review, Oct. 1, 1859, p. 293.
[502] Analysis of the Phenomena of the Human Mind, J.S. Mill's edition, vol. i, p. 111.
[503] On the Associability of Relations between Feelings, in Principles of Psychology, vol. i, p. 259. It is impossible to regard the "cohering of each feeling with previously-experienced feelings of the same class, order, genus, species, and, so far as may be, the same variety," which Spencer calls (p. 257) 'the sole process of association of feelings,' as any equivalent for what is commonly known as Association by similarity.
[504] The Senses and the Intellect, pp. 491-3.
[505] See his Time and Space, chapter v, and his Theory of Practice, §§ 53 to 57.
[506] Psychologie als Wissenschaft (1824), 2.
[507] Prof. Ribot, in chapter i of his 'Contemporary German Psychology,' has given a good account of Herbart and his school, and of Beneke, his rival and partial analogue. See also two articles on the Herbartian Psychology, by G. F. Stout, in Mind for 1888. J. D. Morrell's Outlines of Mental Philosophy (2d ed., London, 1862) largely follows Herbart and Beneke. I know of no other English book which does so.
[508] See his Grundtatsachen des Bewusstseins (1883), chap. vi et passim, especially pp. 106 ff., 364.
[509] The most burdensome and utterly gratuitous of them are perhaps Steinthal's, in his Einleitung in die Psychologie, 2te Aufl. (1881). Cf. also G. Glogau: Steinthal's Psychologische Formeln (1886).