[276] P. 797.
[277] P. 812.
[278] Bottom of page 797.
[279] In fact, to borrow a simile from Prof. G. E. Müller (Theorie der sinnl. Aufmerksamkeit, p. 38), the various senses bear in the Helmholtzian philosophy of perception the same relation to the 'object' perceived by their means that a troop of jolly drinkers bear to the landlord's bill, when no one has any money, but each hopes that one of the rest will pay.
[280] Grundtatsachen des Seelenlebens (1883), pp. 480, 591-2. Psychologische Studien (1885), p. 14.
[281] Psychology, ii. p. 174.
[282] Ibid. p. 168.
[283] Senses and Intellect, 3d ed. pp. 366-75.
[284] Cf. Hall and Donaldson in Mind, x. 559.
[285] As other examples of the confusion, take Mr. Sully: "The fallacious assumption that there can be an idea of distance in general, apart from particular distances" (Mind, iii. p. 177); and Wundt: "An indefinite localization, which waits for experience to give it its reference to real space, stands in contradiction with the very idea of localization, which means the reference to a determinate point of space" (Physiol. Psych., 1te Aufl. p. 480).