With every desire that the best interests of my Countrymen should be promoted, and with sincere respect for those who entertain a similar wish, I have felt it my duty as an Englishman, and still more as a Clergyman, to submit the following considerations to my Queen and my Country.

The Crystal Palace now erecting at Sydenham is designed to be the most splendid display of national greatness in the earth. No objection can exist to its grandeur, its beauty, the marvellous exotics to be exhibited in it, or to the display of ingenious manufactures. Some things it is intended to expose, which may prove decidedly objectionable: I refer to the sculpture-department. But I will not enter into details. The one great evil characterising the plan, is this—That it is designed to open the building to visitors during one half of the Lord’s Day.

Observe—the people of London and its suburbs, that is, four millions, are invited to mutilate the Sabbath, by a plan which allows the first half to be given to God’s worship, but allures them to spend the second half in worldly amusement. The favourers of the scheme virtually say—“Resort to the House of God in the morning, and to the Temple of Pleasure the rest of the day.” This is a scheme far more artful, than if the enemy of mankind had said, “Give the whole day to me:” that would have shocked us at once: but—“Let half be given to God, and the second half to Pleasure”—this is plausible: and it is therefore so much the more dangerous.

I have said, four millions are thus invited. But consider the Counties involved in this invitation—the many watering-places in those counties, which have Excursion-trains in connection with London the whole of Sunday—the near neighbourhood of France and other Continental countries—the habits of those countries in making Sunday an open day for every kind of diversion. Taking all these points into consideration, there is something more to be contemplated, than the mere erection of a Crystal Palace.

Let us reflect how the plan will work. I have used a decent term, “Pleasure.” And the favourers of the scheme may adopt terms yet more reputable: inviting people to the study of Nature, in all the wonderful productions of native and foreign plants, leading them “from Nature up to Nature’s God.” This sounds well: but after all, the thing is, not what an elegant writer may describe it, but what the Million will make it. A poet, or an artist, may disguise a subject in a thousand ways: but this Temple of Pleasure will infallibly become, in the hands of the Million, a Focus of Dissipation.

Analyse a little this divided Sabbath, this Lord’s Day divided into two halves: not indeed perfectly equal halves; for the nominal date of recreation commences precisely one hour after mid-day: then the rush of railway carriages from the London terminus is to commence, Divine Service having at most Churches in and about London ended at one o’clock. Then, and in the hours following, the twenty, or the fifty thousand men, women and children, are to be set in motion. They will find no intoxicating drinks sold on the premises of the Crystal Palace! But will not the surrounding localities offer them, under the name of refreshments, whatever they please?

Look to the first part of the day. Does any man suppose that one half of these many thousands will have been worshipping God in the family and in the Church? Is it in the least degree likely? Does a single favourer of the scheme imagine it probable? I think not.

But then it will be pleaded, that the scheme is purposely so arranged, that people might, if they wished, go to Church with their families in the forenoon. I have even heard it gravely said, “The people need not break the Sabbath: they may go to Church in the morning; and if they do not, it is their own fault.” To this argument silence might be the best reply. And I hope truly, that the Conscience of the Nation will repudiate such sophistry.

I speak of Conscience: and I remember that the conscience of a Child is as much honoured and protected by God, as the conscience of any other individual. Take heed that ye offend not one of these little ones. Better for a man to have a millstone hanged about his neck, and he be cast into the sea, than that the moral sense of a young person be perverted. Suppose, now, a father or mother to take some of their children to Church, and hear the Commandments read: then imagine an ingenuous boy or girl, on the way to the Crystal Palace, saying, “The Minister read the words, Remember that thou keep holy the Sabbath-day;” and they ask father or mother to reconcile the words of the command, and their excursion of amusement: the parents hush up the matter, by saying, “Children must not be particular; it is enough to keep holy half the Sabbath Day, and spend the rest of it pleasantly.” What a comment would this be!

This then is the sin, the one sin, at which I take aim. I do not pursue this part of the subject, by showing what multitudes of Railway servants, Publicans, Policemen, and others, will inevitably be absorbed during the entire Sabbath for miles and miles around, by this scheme. Here is the one crime, a divided Sabbath: here is the focus and centre of it, the Crystal Palace at Sydenham!—If any do not see the evil, or are determined to blink it, it will not be difficult to draw up a Sketch (not an exaggerated Sketch, but a very simple one, and so much the more convincing:) taking into view—1. London and its suburbs: 2. The circumjacent Counties: 3. The infection of the Continental Sabbath: 4. The state of the families of the industrial classes during the six week-days: and, 5. Their probable condition from Saturday Evening to Monday Evening, forty-eight hours, resulting from this scheme of a Divided Sabbath. But I hope that no such Tract will ever have to be written.