Referring to death-trance, Dr. Madden observes, ib., p. 388—“Death-trance, or that profound degree of lethargy which closely counterfeits death, deserves greater attention than is generally paid to it as a pathological condition, as well as a possible cause of premature interment. For, unless we reject every statement, however well authenticated, of those who have witnessed such cases, merely because their experience does not tally with our preconceived opinions and wishes, neither the frequent occurrence of death-trance nor the fearful results of its non-recognition can be questioned.”
Mr. John Chippendale, F.R.C.S., writing to the Lancet, 1889, vol. i., p. 1173, on “Catalepsy.—Post-mortem Sweating,” says:—
“I may mention that there is a record of a man who during an illness was seized with trance, though, as he lay in what Claudio calls ‘cold abstraction,’ he was aware of all that was passing. At last, as he was about to be covered in his coffin, his mental condition was such that he broke into a profuse sweat, which was fortunately perceived, and he recovered and was able to recount his experiences.”
It would appear from the following telegram through Reuter’s Agency that trance is occasionally epidemic:—
[From Daily Telegraph, March 17, 1890.]
“A NEW DISEASE.
“Vienna, March 15, 1890.
“Several cases of a new disease, which originally appeared in Mantua immediately after the subsidence of the recent influenza epidemic, and to which the people of that city gave the name of ‘La nonna’—Anglice, ‘Falling asleep’—have occurred in the Comitat of Pressburg.
“Persons suffering from this complaint fall into a death-like trance, lasting about four days, out of which the patient wakes in a state of intense exhaustion. Recovery is very slow, but, so far, no fatal case has been reported.”
A correspondent writing to the English Mechanic September 13, 1895, says:—“I know one lady who has been three times prepared for burial, and very narrowly escaped it on the first occasion.” The author wrote to the writer for further details, and received a reply, dated September 19, 1895, from which it appears that the lady had married into a political family of considerable note, who would not care to have her identity disclosed. My correspondent says:—“ I know that she lay several days in a state not to be distinguished from death; that she was in her coffin, and, I believe, showed signs of life just as the coffin was about to be closed. On two subsequent occasions she passed into similar trances; but though believed to be dead, and treated as such, the previous experience prevented any idea of burial being entertained” until clear evidence of dissolution should appear.