May 24, 1858.
Erratum, p. 157, l. 11 from top, for sciences read science.
CONTENTS
OF
THE FIRST VOLUME.
| PAGE | ||
|---|---|---|
| Preface | [v] | |
| PART I. | ||
| OF IDEAS. | ||
| Introduction | [3] | |
| BOOK I. | ||
| OF IDEAS IN GENERAL. | ||
| Chap. I. Of the FundamentalAntithesis of Philosophy | [23] | |
| Sect. [1]. | Thoughts and Things | — |
| [2]. | Necessary and Experiential Truths | [25] |
| [3]. | Deduction and Induction | [27] |
| [4]. | Theories and Facts | [29] |
| [5]. | Ideas and Sensations | [30] |
| [6]. | Reflexion and Sensation | [33] |
| [7]. | Subjective and Objective | [35] |
| [8]. | Matter and Form | [38] |
| [9]. | Man the Interpreter of Nature | [41] |
| [10]. | The Fundamental Antithesis is inseparable | [43] |
| [11]. | Successive Generalization | [49] |
| [viii] | ||
| Chap. II. Of Technical Terms | [54] | |
| Art. [1]. | Examples. | |
| [2]. | Useof Terms. | |
| Chap. III. Of NecessaryTruths | [57] | |
| Art. [1]. | The two Elements of Knowledge, | |
| [2]. | Shown by necessary Truths. | |
| [3]. | Examples of necessary Truths in numbers. | |
| [4]. | Theopposite cannot be distinctly conceived. | |
| [5]. | Other Examples. | |
| [6]. | Universal Truths. | |
| Chap. IV. Of Experience | [65] | |
| Art. [1]. | Experience cannot prove necessaryTruths, | |
| [2]. | Except when aided by Ideas. | |
| Chap. V. Of the Grounds ofNecessary Truths | [69] | |
| Art. [1]. | These Grounds are Fundamental Ideas. | |
| [2]. | These are to be reviewed. | |
| [3]. | Definitions and Axioms. | |
| [4]. | Syllogism, | |
| [5]. | Produces no new Truths. | |
| [6]. | Axioms needed. | |
| [7]. | Axioms depend on Ideas: | |
| [8]. | Sodo Definitions. | |
| [9]. | Ideanot completely expressed. | |
| Chap. VI. The Fundamental Ideasare not derived from Experience | [76] | |
| Art. [1]. | No connexion observed. | |
| [2]. | Faculties implied in observation. | |
| [3]. | Weare to examine our Faculties. | |
| Chap. VII. Of the Philosophy ofthe Sciences | [81] | |
| Sciences arranged according toIdeas. | ||
| [ix] | ||
| BOOK II. | ||
| THE PHILOSOPHY OF THE PURESCIENCES. | ||
| Chap. I. Of the Pure Sciences | [88] | |
| Art. [1]. | Geometry, Arithmetic, Algebra, | |
| [2]. | Arenot Inductive Sciences: | |
| [3]. | AreMathematical Sciences. | |
| [4]. | Mixed Mathematics. | |
| [5]. | Space, Time, Number. | |
| Chap. II. Of the Idea ofSpace | [91] | |
| Art. [1]. | Space is an Idea, | |
| [2]. | Notderived from Experience, | |
| [3]. | AsGeometrical Truth shows. | |
| [4]. | Space is a Form of Experience. | |
| [5]. | Thephrase not essential. | |
| Chap. III. Of some Peculiaritiesof the Idea of Space | [95] | |
| Art. [1]. | Space is not an Abstract Notion. | |
| [2]. | Space is infinite. | |
| [3]. | Space is real. | |
| [4]. | Space is a Form of Intuition. | |
| [5]. | Figure. | |
| [6]. | ThreeDimensions. | |
| Chap. IV. Of the Definitions andAxioms which relate to Space | [98] | |
| Art. [1]. | Geometry. | |
| [2]. | Definitions. | |
| [3]. | Axioms. | |
| [4]. | NotHypotheses. | |
| [5]. | Axioms necessary. | |
| [6]. | Straight Lines. | |
| [7]. | Planes. | |
| [8]. | ElementaryGeometry. | |
| Chap. V. Of some Objectionswhich have been made to the Doctrines stated in the previousChapter | [107] | |
| Art. [1]. | How is Geometry hypothetical? | |
| [2]. | Whatwas Stewart's view? | |
| [x] | ||
| [3]. | 'Legitimate filiations' of Definitions. | |
| [4]. | Is aDefinition a complete explanation? | |
| [5]. | Aresome Axioms Definitions? | |
| [6]. | Axiom concerning Circles. | |
| [7]. | CanAxioms become truisms? | |
| [8]. | Useof such. | |
| Chap. VI. Of the Perception ofSpace | [117] | |
| Art. [1]. | Which Senses apprehend Space? | |
| [2]. | Perception of solid figure. | |
| [3]. | Isan interpretation. | |
| [4]. | Maybe analysed. | |
| [5]. | Outline. | |
| [6]. | Reversedconvexity. | |
| [7]. | Dowe perceive Space by Touch? | |
| [8]. | Brown’s Opinion. | |
| [9]. | TheMuscular Sense. | |
| [10]. | Bell’s Opinion. | |
| [11]. | Perception includes Activity. | |
| [12]. | Perception of the Skyey Dome. | |
| [13]. | Reid’s Idomenians. | |
| [14]. | Motion of the Eye. | |
| [15]. | Searching Motion. | |
| [16]. | Sensible Spot. | |
| [17]. | Expressions implying Motion. | |
| Chap. VII. Of the Idea of Time | [131] | |
| Art. [1]. | Time an Idea not derived fromExperience. | |
| [2]. | Timeis a Form of Experience. | |
| [3]. | Number. | |
| [4]. | Is Time derived fromMotion? | |
| Chap. VIII. Of somePeculiarities in the Idea of Time | [134] | |
| Art. [1]. | Time is not an Abstract Notion. | |
| [2]. | Timeis infinite. | |
| [3]. | Timeis a Form of Intuition. | |
| [4]. | Timeis of one Dimension, | |
| [5]. | Andno more. | |
| [6]. | Rhythm. | |
| [7]. | Alternation. | |
| [8]. | Arithmetic. | |
| [xi] | ||
| Chap. IX. Of the Axioms whichrelate to Number | [138] | |
| Art. [1]. | Grounds of Arithmetic. | |
| [2]. | Intuition. | |
| [3]. | Arithmetical Axioms, | |
| [4]. | AreConditions of Numerical Reasoning | |
| [5]. | Inall Arithmetical Operations. | |
| [6]. | Higher Numbers. | |
| Chap. X. Of the Perception ofTime and Number | [141] | |
| Art. [1]. | Memory. | |
| [2]. | Sense ofSuccessiveness | |
| [3]. | Implies Activity. | |
| [4]. | Number also does so. | |
| [5]. | Andapprehension of Rhythm. | |
| Note to Chapter X. | [145] | |
| Chap. XI. Of MathematicalReasoning | [147] | |
| Art. [1]. | Discursive Reasoning. | |
| [2]. | Technical Terms of Reasoning. | |
| [3]. | Geometrical Analysis and Synthesis. | |
| Chap. XII. Of the Foundations ofthe Higher Mathematics | [151] | |
| Art. [1]. | The Idea of a Limit. | |
| [2]. | Theuse of General Symbols. | |
| [3]. | Connexion of Symbols and Analysis. | |
| Chap. XIII. The Doctrine ofMotion | [156] | |
| Art. [1]. | Pure Mechanism. | |
| [2]. | Formal Astronomy. | |
| Chap. XIV. Of the Application ofMathematics to the Inductive Sciences | [159] | |
| Art. [1]. | The Ideas of Space and Number are clear from thefirst. | |
| [2]. | Their application in Astronomy. | |
| [3]. | Conic Sections, &c. | |
| [4]. | Arabian Numerals. | |
| [5]. | Newton’s Lemmas. | |
| [6]. | Tides. | |
| [7]. | Mechanics. | |
| [8]. | Optics. | |
| [9]. | Conclusion. | |
| [xii] | ||
| BOOK III. | ||
| THE PHILOSOPHY OF THE MECHANICALSCIENCES. | ||
| Chap. I. Ofthe Mechanical Sciences | [171] | |
| Chap. II. Of the Idea of Cause | [173] | |
| Art. [1]. | Not derived from Observation, | |
| [2]. | Asappears by its use. | |
| [3]. | Cause cannot be observed. | |
| [4]. | IsCause only constant succession? | |
| [5]. | Other reasons. | |
| Chap. III. Modern Opinionsrespecting the Idea of Cause | [178] | |
| Art. [1]. | Hume’s Doctrine. | |
| [2]. | Stewart and Brown. | |
| [3]. | Kant. | |
| [4]. | Relation of Kant andBrown. | |
| [5]. | Axioms flow from the Idea. | |
| [6]. | TheIdea implies activity in the Mind. | |
| Chap. IV. Of the Axioms whichrelate to the Idea of Cause | [184] | |
| Art. [1]. | Causes are Abstract Conceptions. | |
| [2]. | First Axiom. | |
| [3]. | Second Axiom. | |
| [4]. | Limitation of the Second Axiom. | |
| [5]. | Third Axiom. | |
| [6]. | Extent of the Third Axiom. | |
| Chap. V. Of the Origin of ourConceptions of Force and Matter | [205] | |
| Art. [1]. | Force. | |
| [2]. | Matter. | |
| [3]. | Solidity. | |
| [4]. | Inertia. | |
| [5]. | Application. | |
| [xiii] | ||
| Chap. VI. Of the Establishmentof the Principles of Statics | [212] | |
| Art. [1]. | Object of the Chapter. | |
| [2]. | Statics and Dynamics. | |
| [3]. | Equilibrium. | |
| [4]. | Measure of Statical Forces. | |
| [5]. | TheCenter of Gravity. | |
| [6]. | Oblique Forces. | |
| [7]. | Force acts at any point of its Direction. | |
| [8]. | TheParallelogram of Forces | |
| [9]. | Is anecessary Truth. | |
| [10]. | Center of Gravity descends. | |
| [11]. | Stevinus's Proof. | |
| [12]. | Principle of Virtual Velocities. | |
| [13]. | Fluids press equally. | |
| [14]. | Foundation of this Axiom. | |
| Chap. VII. Of the Establishmentof the Principles of Dynamics | [235] | |
| Art. [1]. | History. | |
| [2]. | TheFirst Law of Motion. | |
| [3]. | Gravity is a Uniform Force. | |
| [4]. | TheSecond Law of Motion. | |
| [5]. | TheThird Law of Motion. | |
| [6]. | Action and Reaction in Moving Bodies. | |
| [7]. | D’Alembert’s Principle. | |
| [8]. | Connexion of Statics and Dynamics. | |
| [9]. | Mechanical Principles grow more evident. | |
| [10]. | Controversy of the Measure of Force. | |
| Chap. VIII. Of the Paradox ofUniversal Propositions obtained from Experience | [263] | |
| Art. [1]. | Experience cannot establish necessaryTruths; | |
| [2]. | Butcan interpret Axioms. | |
| [3]. | Gives us the Matter of Truths. | |
| [4]. | Exemplifies Truths. | |
| [5]. | Cannot shake Axioms. | |
| [6]. | Isthis applicable in other cases? | |
| Chap. IX. Of the Establishmentof the Law of Universal Gravitation | [272] | |
| Art. [1]. | General course of the History. | |
| [xiv] | ||
| [2]. | Particulars as to the Law. | |
| [3]. | Asto the Gravity of Matter. | |
| [4]. | Universality of the Law. | |
| [5]. | IsGravity an essential quality? | |
| [6]. | Newton’s Rule of Philosophizing. | |
| [7]. | Hypotheses respecting Gravity. | |
| [8]. | DoBodies act at a distance? | |
| Chap. X. Of the generalDiffusion of clear Mechanical Ideas | [279] | |
| Art. [1]. | Nature of the Process | |
| [2]. | Among the Ancients. | |
| [3]. | Kepler, &c. | |
| [4]. | Lord Monboddo, &c. | |
| [5]. | Schelling, &c. | |
| [6]. | Common usage. | |
| [7]. | Effect of Phrases. | |
| [8]. | Contempt of Predecessors. | |
| [9]. | Less detail hereafter. | |
| [10]. | Mechanico-Chemical Sciences. | |
| [11]. | Secondary Mechanical Sciences. | |
| BOOK IV. | ||
| THE PHILOSOPHY OF THE SECONDARYMECHANICAL SCIENCES. | ||
| Chap. I. Of the Idea of a Mediumas commonly employed | [293] | |
| Art. [1]. | Of Primary and Secondary Qualities. | |
| [2]. | TheIdea of Externality. | |
| [3]. | Sensation by a Medium. | |
| [4]. | Process of Perception of Secondary Qualities. | |
| Chap. II. On Peculiarities inthe Perceptions of the Different Senses | [302] | |
| Art. [1]. | Difference of Senses. | |
| Sect. I. | Prerogatives of Sight. | |
| Art. [2]. | Position. | |
| [3]. | Distance. | |
| [xv] | ||
| Sect. II. | Prerogatives of Hearing. | |
| Art. [4]. | Musical Intervals. | |
| [5]. | Chords. | |
| [6]. | Rhythm. | |
| Sect. III. | TheParadoxes of Vision. | |
| Art. [7]. | First Paradox. | |
| [8]. | Second Paradox. | |
| [9]. | Thesame for near Objects. | |
| [10]. | Objections answered. | |
| Sect. IV. | ThePerception of Visible Figures. | |
| Art. [11]. | Brown’s Opinion. | |
| Chap. III. Successive Attemptsat the Scientific Application of the Idea of a Medium | [322] | |
| Art. [1]. | Introduction. | |
| [2]. | Sound. | |
| [3]. | Light. | |
| [4]. | Heat. | |
| Chap.IV. Of the Measure of Secondary Qualities | [333] | |
| Sect. I. | Scales ofQualities in General. | |
| Art. [1]. | Intensity. | |
| [2]. | Quantity and Quality. | |
| Sect. II. | TheMusical Scale. | |
| Art. [3]. | MusicalRelations. | |
| [4]. | Musical Standard. | |
| Sect. III. | Scalesof Colour. | |
| Art. [5]. | The Prismatic Scale. | |
| [6]. | Newton’s Scale. | |
| [7]. | Scales of Impure Colours. | |
| [8]. | Chromatometer. | |
| Sect. IV. | Scales ofLight. | |
| Art. [9]. | Photometer. | |
| [10]. | Cyanometer. | |
| Sect. V. | Scales ofHeat. | |
| Art. [11]. | Thermometers. | |
| [12]. | Their progress. | |
| [13]. | Fixed Points. | |
| [14]. | Concordance of Thermometers. | |
| [15]. | Natural Measure. | |
| [16]. | Law of Cooling. | |
| [xvi] | ||
| [17]. | Theory of Exchanges. | |
| [18]. | Air Thermometer. | |
| [19]. | Theory of Heat. | |
| [20]. | Other Instruments. | |
| Sect. VI. | Scales ofother Quantities. | |
| Art. [21]. | Tastes and Smells. | |
| [22]. | Quality of Sounds. | |
| [23]. | Articulate Sounds. | |
| [24]. | Transition. | |
| BOOK V. | ||
| OF THE PHILOSOPHY OF THEMECHANICO-CHEMICAL SCIENCES. | ||
| Chap. I. Attempts at theScientific Application of the Idea of Polarity | [359] | |
| Art. [1]. | Introduction of the Idea. | |
| [2]. | Magnetism. | |
| [3]. | Electricity. | |
| [4]. | Voltaic Electricity. | |
| [5]. | Light. | |
| [6]. | Crystallization. | |
| [7]. | Chemical Affinity. | |
| [8]. | General Remarks. | |
| [9]. | Likerepels like. | |
| Chap. II. Of the Connexion ofPolarities | [371] | |
| Art. [1]. | Different Polar Phenomena from oneCause. | |
| [2]. | Connexion of Magnetic and Electric Polarity. | |
| [3]. | Ampère’s Theory. | |
| [4]. | Faraday’s views. | |
| [5]. | Connexion of Electrical and Chemical Polarity. | |
| [6]. | Davy’s and Faraday’s views | |
| [7]. | Depend upon Ideas as well as Experiments. | |
| [8]. | Faraday’s Anticipations. | |
| [9]. | Connexion of Chemical and Crystalline Polarities. | |
| [10]. | Connexion of Crystalline and Optical Polarities. | |
| [11]. | Connexion of Polarities in general. | |
| [12]. | Schelling’s Speculations. | |
| [13]. | Hegel’s vague notions. | |
| [14]. | Ideas must guide Experiment. | |
CONTENTS
OF
THE SECOND VOLUME.
| PAGE | ||
|---|---|---|
| BOOK VI. | ||
| THE PHILOSOPHY OF CHEMISTRY. | ||
| Chap. I. Attempts to conceiveElementary Composition | [3] | |
| Art. [1]. | Fundamental Ideas of Chemistry. | |
| [2]. | Elements. | |
| [3]. | DoCompounds resemble their Elements? | |
| [4]. | TheThree Principles. | |
| [5]. | AModern Errour. | |
| [6]. | AreCompounds determined by the Figure of Elements? | |
| [7]. | Crystalline Form depends on Figure of Elements. | |
| [8]. | AreCompounds determined by Mechanical Attraction ofElements? | |
| [9]. | Newton’s followers. | |
| [10]. | Imperfection of their Hypotheses. | |
| Chap. II. Establishment andDevelopment of the Idea of Chemical Affinity | [15] | |
| Art. [1]. | Early Chemists. | |
| [2]. | Chemical Affinity. | |
| [3]. | Affinity or Attraction? | |
| [4]. | Affinity preferable. | |
| [5]. | Analysis is possible. | |
| [vi] | ||
| [6]. | Affinity is Elective. | |
| [7]. | Controversy on this. | |
| [8]. | Affinity is Definite. | |
| [9]. | Arethese Principles necessarily true? | |
| [10]. | Composition determines Properties. | |
| [11]. | Comparison on this subject. | |
| [12]. | Composition determines Crystalline Form. | |
| Chap. III. Of the Idea ofSubstance | [29] | |
| Art. [1]. | Indestructibility of Substance. | |
| [2]. | TheIdea of Substance. | |
| [3]. | Locke’s Denial of Substance. | |
| [4]. | Isall Substance heavy? | |
| Note on Sir W. Hamilton’s objections | [37] | |
| Chap. IV. Application of theIdea of Substance in Chemistry | [39] | |
| Art. [1]. | A Body is Equal to its Elements. | |
| [2]. | Lavoisier. | |
| [3]. | Arethere Imponderable Elements? | |
| [4]. | Faraday’s views. | |
| [5]. | Composition of Water. | |
| [6]. | Heatin Chemistry. | |
| Chap. V. The Atomic Theory | [48] | |
| Art. [1]. | The Theory on Chemical Grounds. | |
| [2]. | Hypothesis of Atoms. | |
| [3]. | ItsChemical Difficulties. | |
| [4]. | Grounds of the Atomic Doctrine. | |
| [5]. | Ancient Atomists. | |
| [6]. | Francis Bacon. | |
| [7]. | Modern Atomists. | |
| [8]. | Arguments for and against. | |
| [9]. | Boscovich’s Theory. | |
| [10]. | Molecular Hypothesis. | |
| [11]. | Poisson’s Inference. | |
| [12]. | Wollaston’s Argument. | |
| [13]. | Properties are Permanent. | |
| [vii] | ||
| BOOK VII. | ||
| THE PHILOSOPHY OF MORPHOLOGY,INCLUDING CRYSTALLOGRAPHY. | ||
| Chap. I. Explication of the Ideaof Symmetry | [67] | |
| Art. [1]. | Symmetry, what. | |
| [2]. | Kinds of Symmetry. | |
| [3]. | Examples in Nature. | |
| [4]. | Vegetables and Animals. | |
| [5]. | Symmetry a Fundamental Idea. | |
| [6]. | Result of Symmetry. | |
| Chap. II. Application of theIdea of Symmetry to Crystals | [75] | |
| Art. [1]. | ‘Fundamental Forms.’ | |
| [2]. | Their use. | |
| [3]. | ‘Systems of Crystallization.’ | |
| [4]. | Cleavage. | |
| [5]. | Other Properties. | |
| Chap. III. Speculations foundedupon the Symmetry of Crystals | [80] | |
| Art. [1]. | Integrant Molecules. | |
| [2]. | Difficulties of the Theory. | |
| [3]. | Merit of the Theory. | |
| [4]. | Wollaston’s Hypothesis. | |
| [5]. | Maxim for such Hypotheses. | |
| [6]. | Dalton’s Hypothesis. | |
| [7]. | Ampère’s Hypothesis. | |
| [8]. | Difficulty of such Hypotheses. | |
| [9]. | Isomorphism. | |
| [viii] | ||
| BOOK VIII. | ||
| PHILOSOPHY OF THE CLASSIFICATORYSCIENCES. | ||
| Chap. I. TheIdea of Likeness as Governing the Use of Common Names | [95] | |
| Art. [1]. | Object of the Chapter. | |
| [2]. | Unity of the Individual. | |
| [3]. | Condition of Unity. | |
| [4]. | Kinds. | |
| [5]. | Not made byDefinitions. | |
| [6]. | Condition of the Use of Terms. | |
| [7]. | Terms may have different Uses. | |
| [8]. | Gradation of Kinds. | |
| [9]. | Characters of Kinds. | |
| [10]. | Difficulty of Definitions. | |
| [11]. | ‘The Five Words.’ | |
| Chap. II. The Methods of NaturalHistory, as regulated by the Idea of Likeness | [108] | |
| Sect. I. | Natural History inGeneral. | |
| Art. [1]. | Idea of Likeness in Natural History. | |
| [2]. | Condition of its Use. | |
| Sect. II. | Terminology. | |
| Art. [3]. | Meaning of the word. | |
| Sect. III. | The Planof the System. | |
| Art. [4]. | Its Meaning. | |
| [5]. | Latent Reference to Natural Affinity. | |
| [6]. | Natural Classes. | |
| [7]. | Artificial Classes. | |
| [8]. | AreGenera Natural? | |
| [9]. | Natural History and Mathematics. | |
| [10]. | Natural Groups given by Type, not by Definition. | |
| [11]. | Physiography. | |
| [12]. | Artificial and Natural Systems. | |
| [ix] | ||
| Sect. IV. | Methodsof framing Natural Systems. | |
| Art. [13]. | Method of Blind Trial. | |
| [14]. | Method of General Comparison. | |
| Sect. V. | Gradationof Groups. | |
| Art. [15]. | Series of Subdivisions. | |
| [16]. | What is a Species? | |
| [17]. | The words ‘Species’ and ‘Genus.’ | |
| [18]. | Varieties. Races. | |
| Sect. VI. | Nomenclature. | |
| Art. [19]. | Binary Nomenclature. | |
| Sect. VII. | Diagnosis. | |
| Art. [20]. | Characteristick and Systematick. | |
| Chap. III. Application of theNatural History Method to Mineralogy | [138] | |
| Art. [1]. | Mohs’s System. | |
| [2]. | His‘Characteristick.’ | |
| [3]. | Mineral Species not yet well fixed. | |
| [4]. | Orders of Minerals. | |
| [5]. | Nomenclature of Minerals. | |
| [6]. | M.Necker’s ‘Règne Mineral.’ | |
| [7]. | Inconvenience of taking a Chemical Basis of MineralSystems. | |
| [8]. | Relation of Natural History and Chemistry. | |
| [9]. | Whatis a Mineralogical Individual? | |
| [10]. | Awell-formed Crystal is an Individual. | |
| [11]. | Not the Integrant Molecules, | |
| [12]. | Nor the Cleavage Forms. | |
| [13]. | Compound Crystals are not Individuals. | |
| [14]. | Crystalline Forms are sufficiently complete forthis. | |
| [15]. | Including aggregate Masses. | |
| [16]. | DoArtificial Crystals belong to Mineralogy? | |
| [17]. | The Mineralogical Individual extends as far as the same CrystallineAxes extend. | |
| [18]. | Artificial Crystals do belong to Mineralogy: | |
| [x] | ||
| [19]. | Cannot be excluded. | |
| [20]. | Species to be determined by the Crystalline Power. | |
| [21]. | Secondary Derivative Forms are Varieties: | |
| [22]. | Are not Species, as M. Necker holds. | |
| Chap. IV. Of the Idea of NaturalAffinity | [159] | |
| Art. [1]. | The Idea of Affinity | |
| [2]. | Isnot to be made out by Arbitrary Rules. | |
| [3]. | Functions of Living things are many, | |
| [4]. | Butall lead to the same arrangement. | |
| [5]. | Thisis Cuvier’s principle: | |
| [6]. | AndDecandolle’s. | |
| [7]. | Isthis applicable to Inorganic Bodies? | |
| [8]. | Yes;by the agreement of Physical and ChemicalArrangement. | |
| BOOK IX. | ||
| THE PHILOSOPHY OF BIOLOGY. | ||
| Chap. 1. Analogy of Biology withother Sciences | [169] | |
| Art. [1]. | Biology involves the Idea of Life. | |
| [2]. | ThisIdea to be historically traced. | |
| [3]. | TheIdea at first expressed by means of other Ideas. | |
| [4]. | Mystical, Mechanical, Chemical, and Vital FluidHypotheses. | |
| Chap. II. Successive BiologicalHypotheses | [174] | |
| Sect. [I]. | The Mystical School. | |
| Sect. [II]. | The Iatrochemical School. | |
| Sect. [III]. | The Iatromathematical School. | |
| Sect. [IV]. | The Vital Fluid School. | |
| Sect. [V]. | The Psychical School. | |
| [xi] | ||
| Chap. III. Attempts to Analysethe Idea of Life | [195] | |
| Art. [1]. | Definitions of Life, | |
| [2]. | ByStahl, Humboldt, Kant. | |
| [3]. | Definition of Organization by Kant. | |
| [4]. | Lifeis a System of Functions. | |
| [5]. | Bichat. Sum of Functions. | |
| [6]. | Useof Definition. | |
| [7]. | Cuvier’s view. | |
| [8]. | Classifications of Functions. | |
| [9]. | Vital, Natural, and Animal Functions. | |
| [10]. | Bichat. Organic and Animal Life. | |
| [11]. | Use of this Classification. | |
| Chap. IV. Attempts to form Ideasof separate Vital Forces, and first, of Assimilation andSecretion | [203] | |
| Sect. I. | Course ofBiological Research. | |
| Art. [1]. | Observation and New Conceptions. | |
| Sect. II. | Attemptsto form a distinct Conception of Assimilation andSecretion. | |
| Art. [2]. | The Ancients. | |
| [3]. | Buffon. Interior Mould. | |
| [4]. | Defect of this view. | |
| [5]. | Cuvier. Life a Vortex. | |
| [6]. | Defect of this view. | |
| [7]. | Schelling. Matter and Form. | |
| [8]. | Lifea constant Form of circulating Matter, &c. | |
| Sect. III. | Attemptsto conceive the Forces of Assimilation andSecretion. | |
| Art. [9]. | Assimilation is a Vital Force. | |
| [10]. | The name ‘Assimilation.’ | |
| [11]. | Several processes involved in Assimilation. | |
| [12]. | Absorption. Endosmose. | |
| [13]. | Absorption involves a Vital Force. | |
| [14]. | Secretion. Glands. | |
| [15]. | Motions of Vital Fluids. | |
| [xii] | ||
| Sect. IV. | Attemptsto conceive the Process of Generation. | |
| Art. [16]. | ‘Reproduction’ figuratively used forGeneration. | |
| [17]. | Nutrition different from | |
| [18]. | Generation. | |
| [19]. | Generations successively included. | |
| [20]. | Pre-existence of Germs. | |
| [21]. | Difficulty of this view. | |
| [22]. | Communication of Vital Forces. | |
| [23]. | Close similarity of Nutrition and Generation. | |
| [24]. | The Identity of the two Processes exemplified. | |
| Chap. V. Attempts to form Ideasof separate Vital Forces, continued.—Voluntary Motion. | [222] | |
| Art. [1]. | Voluntary Motion one of the animalFunctions. | |
| [2]. | Progressive knowledge ofit. | |
| [3]. | Nervous Fluid not electric. | |
| [4]. | Irritability. Glisson. | |
| [5]. | Haller. | |
| [6]. | Contractility. | |
| [7]. | Organic Sensibility and Contractility notseparable. | |
| [8]. | Improperly described by Bichat. | |
| [9]. | Brown. | |
| [10]. | Contractility a peculiarPower. | |
| [11]. | Cuvier’s view. | |
| [12]. | Elementary contractile Action. | |
| [13]. | Strength of Muscular Fibre. | |
| [14]. | Sensations become Perceptions | |
| [15]. | Bymeans of Ideas; | |
| [16]. | And lead to Muscular Actions. | |
| [17]. | Volition comes between Perception and Action. | |
| [18]. | Transition to Psychology, | |
| [19]. | Acenter is introduced. | |
| [20]. | The central consciousness may be obscure. | |
| [21]. | Reflex Muscular Action. | |
| [22]. | Instinct. | |
| [23]. | Difficulty of conceiving Instinct. | |
| [24]. | Instinct opposed to Insight. | |
| [xiii] | ||
| Chap. VI. Of the Idea of FinalCauses | [239] | |
| Art. [1]. | Organization. Parts are Ends andMeans. | |
| [2]. | Notmerely mutually dependent. | |
| [3]. | Notmerely mutually Cause and Effect. | |
| [4]. | Notion of End not derived from Facts. | |
| [5]. | Thisnotion has regulated Physiology. | |
| [6]. | Notion of Design comes from within. | |
| [7]. | Design not understood by Savages. | |
| [8]. | Design opposed to Morphology. | |
| [9]. | Impression of Design when fresh. | |
| [10]. | Acknowledgement of an End by adverse Physiologists. | |
| [11]. | This included in the Notion of Disease. | |
| [12]. | Itbelongs to organized Creatures only. | |
| [13]. | The term Final Cause. | |
| [14]. | Law and Design. | |
| [15]. | Final Causes and Morphology. | |
| [16]. | Expressions of physiological Ends. | |
| [17]. | The Conditions of Existence. | |
| [18]. | The asserted presumption of Teleology. | |
| [19]. | Final Causes in other subjects. | |
| [20]. | Transition to Palætiology. | |
| BOOK X. | ||
| THE PHILOSOPHY OFPALÆTIOLOGY. | ||
| Chap. I. Of PalætiologicalSciences in General | [257] | |
| Art. [1]. | Description of Palætiology. | |
| [2]. | ItsMembers. | |
| [3]. | Other Members. | |
| [4]. | Connexion of the whole subject. | |
| [5]. | Weshall take Material Sciences only; | |
| [6]. | Butthese are connected with others. | |
| Chap. II. Of the Three Membersof a Palætiological Science | [263] | |
| Art. [1]. | Divisions of such Sciences. | |
| [2]. | TheStudy of Causes. | |
| [3]. | Ætiology. | |
| [xiv] | ||
| [4]. | Phenomenology requires Classification. PhenomenalGeology. | |
| [5]. | Phenomenal Uranology. | |
| [6]. | Phenomenal Geography of Plants and Animals. | |
| [7]. | Phenomenal Glossology. | |
| [8]. | TheStudy of Phenomena leads to Theory. | |
| [9]. | Nosound Theory without Ætiology. | |
| [10]. | Causes in Palætiology. | |
| [11]. | Various kinds of Cause. | |
| [12]. | Hypothetical Order of Palætiological Causes. | |
| [13]. | Mode of Cultivating Ætiology:—In Geology: | |
| [14]. | In the Geography of Plants and Animals: | |
| [15]. | In Languages. | |
| [16]. | Construction of Theories. | |
| [17]. | No sound Palætiological Theory yet extant. | |
| Chap. III. Of the Doctrine ofCatastrophes and the Doctrine of Uniformity | [284] | |
| Art. [1]. | Doctrine of Catastrophes. | |
| [2]. | Doctrine of Uniformity. | |
| [3]. | IsUniformity probable a priori? | |
| [4]. | Cycle of Uniformity indefinite. | |
| [5]. | Uniformitarian Arguments are Negative only. | |
| [6]. | Uniformity in the Organic World. | |
| [7]. | Origin of the present Organic World. | |
| [8]. | Nebular Origin of the Solar System. | |
| [9]. | Origin of Languages. | |
| [10]. | No Natural Origin discoverable. | |
| Chap. IV. Of the Relation ofTradition to Palætiology | [297] | |
| Art. [1]. | Importance of Tradition. | |
| [2]. | Connexion of Tradition and Science. | |
| [3]. | Natural and Providential History of the World. | |
| [4]. | TheSacred Narrative. | |
| [5]. | Difficulties in interpreting the Sacred Narrative. | |
| [6]. | Such Difficulties inevitable. | |
| [7]. | Science tells us nothing concerning Creation. | |
| [xv] | ||
| [8]. | Scientific views, when familiar, do not disturb the authority ofScripture. | |
| [9]. | When should Old Interpretations be given up? | |
| [10]. | In what Spirit should the Change be accepted? | |
| [11]. | In what Spirit should the Change be urged? | |
| [12]. | Duty of Mutual forbearance. | |
| [13]. | Case of Galileo. | |
| Chap. V. Of the Conception of aFirst Cause | [316] | |
| Art. [1]. | The Origin of things is not naturallydiscoverable; | |
| [2]. | Yethas always been sought after. | |
| [3]. | There must be a First Cause. | |
| [4]. | This is an Axiom. | |
| [5]. | Involved in the proof of a Deity. | |
| [6]. | Themind is not satisfied without it. | |
| [7]. | TheWhole Course of Nature must have a Cause. | |
| [8]. | Necessary Existence of God. | |
| [9]. | Forms of the Proof. | |
| [10]. | Idea of a First Cause is Necessary. | |
| [11]. | Conception of a First Cause. | |
| [12]. | The First Cause in all Sciences is the same. | |
| [13]. | We are thus led to Moral Subjects. | |
| Conclusion of thisHistory. | ||