| Master of Ceremonies | Mark Smith, Jr. |
| The Prologue will be spoken by | Antoinette Walker. |
IN THE PLAY.
| Sir Jasper Standish | John E. Kellerd. | |
| Col. the Hon. Henry Villiers | Edwin Stevens. | |
| Captain Spicer | Frank H. Westerton. | |
| Lord Verney, Lieut. | Of the | Charles Hammond. |
| Mr. Tom Stafford, Lieut. | 51st | James Carew. |
| Mr. Bob Chichester, Lieut. | Regiment. | Clyde Fogel. |
| Gandy, Private | Addison Pitt. | |
| Fenwick, Private | Shelley Hull. | |
| The Bishop of Bath and Wells | H. Rees Davies. | |
| Col. Kimby McFiontan | R. Peyton Carter. | |
| Capt. Denis O’Hara | J. Malcolm Dunn. | |
| Major Owen MacTeague | Of the | Alfred Cahill. |
| Mr. Lanty MacLusky, Lieut. | “Inniskillings.” | Douglas Wood. |
| Mr. Darby O’Donovan, Cornet. | Emmet Lennon. | |
| Mallow | Stanley Drewitt. | |
| The Innkeeper of the Bear Inn | Harold Watts. | |
| First Courier | Howard Hull. | |
| Second Courier | S. K. Blair. | |
| Post Boy | William Whitney. | |
| Mistress Kitty Bellairs | Henrietta Crosman. | |
| Lady Standish (Julia) | Katharine Florence. | |
| Lady Marie Prideaux | Louise Moodie. | |
| Lady Bab Flyte | Edith Crane. | |
| Mistress Bate-Coome | Genevieve Reynolds. | |
| Hon. Mrs. Beaufort | Charlotte Nicoll Weston. | |
| Miss Prue | Bernice Golden. | |
| Miss Doll | Sybil Klein. | |
| Miss Debby | Jane Cowl. | |
| Miss Sally | Lydia Winters. | |
| Selina | Lillian Coffin. | |
| Lydie | Estelle Coffin. | |
| Barmaid of the Bear Inn | Mignon Hardt. | |
| Clorinde | Mrs. Irvin Chapman. | |
| Dorothea | Gertrude Dorrance. | |
| Arabella | Mrs. Bate-Coome’s | Edith Rowland. |
| Angela | daughters. | Helen Hale. |
| Marjorie | Edna Griffen. | |
| Mistress Tilney | Sara Delaro. |
SIDE-LIGHT AND COMMENTARY ON “SWEET KITTY.”
“Sweet Kitty Bellairs” was acted at the Belasco Theatre until June 4, 1904, when the season ended and that house was closed. It was revived there in the fall, September 3, and, with Miss Crosman in its chief part, was subsequently acted in many other cities. In the season of 1905-’06, Miss Crosman having retired from Belasco’s management, it was again revived, with Miss Bertha Galland as Kitty, and on October 5, 1907, with Miss Eva Moore in that part, it was played at the Haymarket Theatre, London. On February 3, 1904, while this comedy was in the full tide of its first success, one of the many groundless suits against Belasco, accusing him of plagiarism, was brought by Grace B. Hughes, otherwise known as Mary Montagu, who asserted that Belasco’s play was an infringement of one by her, entitled “Sweet Jasmine,” and applied for an injunction to stop him from further presentment of it. Her application was argued before Justice E. Henry Lacombe, March 18, and on March 26 was denied. One of the most vicious propensities of newspaper journalism was sharply illustrated in connection with Miss Montagu’s wanton aspersion on Belasco’s honesty: when it was made, her charge of plagiarism was generally and conspicuously published by the press; when it was disproved, it ceased to be “live news” and merely curt and, in general, obscure record was made of the issue. Minor “resemblances” between the two plays, adduced by the complainant in this action by way of substantiating her charge of literary theft, were such as the facts that in both a military band played music; in both “green” is mentioned as the color of grass, and in both a lover states the nature of his feeling toward the woman he loves. Yet, without any possibility of redress, Belasco was compelled to expend energy, time, and money on making a serious defence against the preposterous accusations of irresponsible frivolity! To oppose and defeat the suit of Miss Montagu cost him a large sum. There is no reasonable doubt that, in the majority of cases, such accusations of plagiarism as those which have been brought against Belasco are made in hope that the person accused will buy off the accuser as the quickest and cheapest way of ending annoyance. Belasco, however, has never gratified such hope; and he assured me: “I never will—for I prefer to lose a thousand dollars in money and ten thousand in time and trouble rather than to submit to blackmail.” In denying the writ applied for by this impudent defamer the court declared that “No direct evidence of copying, either of language or dramatic situation, is shown. A comparison of the two plays shows that they are wholly dissimilar in plot, in characters, in text, and in dramatic situations. The climax of one act in each piece was principally relied upon in argument—where the unexpected discovery of the leading character in a place where she should not be makes a dramatic situation.... This is an old device; it was common property to all playwrights since Sheridan used it in ‘The School for Scandal’ [And since long before that time!—W. W.]. Analyzing the details of the situations as presented in these two plays, the points of essential difference so far outnumber the points of similarity that it is difficult to understand how anyone could persuade himself that one was taken from the other.”—The following letters provide an interesting side-light and commentary on the history of “Bellairs”:
(David Belasco to Egerton Castle, in London.)
“Cartwright Cottage,
“Manhanset Manor, New York,
“August 29, 1904.
“My dear Mr. Castle:—