[607] Professor Dixon in the Quarterly Journal of Economics, XXI, 1906, p. 544, has succinctly reviewed this. Cf. American Political Science Review, IV, 1910, p. 547.
[608] By Amendment of Section 16; see p. [453], supra. The attempt to insert the words "fairly remunerative" in place of "reasonable" so as to invoke new judicial tests is discussed by Smalley, op. cit., 1906, p. 59.
[609] Annals, American Academy of Political Science, March, 1907, p. 302, deals with this point. Also, the able discussion by Professor Smalley, reprinted in our Railway Problems, chapter XXIV.
[610] This procedure has been actually adopted in several cases, Ann. Rep., I.C.C., 1908, 61.
[611] 17 I.C.C. Rep., 317, is a case in point where cotton-oil mills refused to protect an advance in rates.
[612] Cf. 13 Int. Com. Com. Rep., 668; 190 Fed. Rep. 659; and U. S. Commerce Court, 1911, 193 Fed. Rep., 667.
[613] Cf. conditions under the old law; p. [461], supra.
[614] See pp. [195] and [213], supra.
[616] 200 U. S., 613: 20th Ann. Rep. I.C.C., p. 42.