[190] Idem, 1909, p. 32. Circuit Court of Appeals decision, April 29, 1911, Ann. Rep., I.C.C., 1908, p. 32.
[191] 18 I.C.C. Rep., 280. Cf. p. [401], infra.
[192] Boston Transcript, Feb. 20, 1912.
[193] 22 I.C.C. Rep., 51.
[194] 222 U. S., 42. The system is described in the Railway Age Gazette, June 4, 1909.
[195] 21 I.C.C. Rep., 304. Compare also before the U. S. Commerce Court; the Stock Yards case, 192 Fed. Rep., 330; the California Switching case, 188 Fed. Rep., 229; and the Crane Iron Works case, No. 55, April session, 1912. The tap-line decision, 23 I.C.C., 277, most fully discussed the general policy to be observed toward industrial roads in the lumber business. Cf. also the use of boat lines. 23 Idem, 358.
[196] Railway Age Gazette, LII, pp. 269 and 340.
[197] Evidence before the Stanley House Committee on Steel Corporation, Feb. 28, 1912, p. 3667; and Bureau of Corporations on U. S. Steel Corporation, II, p. 72.
[198] American Economic Review, 1911, p. 789.
[199] S. O. Dunn, American Transportation Question, pp. 62, 81.