[203] Another instance is afforded by the Savannah Freight Bureau case: 7 Int. Com. Rep., 458. See our Railway Problems, chap. XII.
[204] Interstate Commerce Commission Reports, decided May 14, 1903. Cf. the extraordinary diversion of traffic over the long route in Troy-Chatham, N. Y. case: 23 I. C. C. Rep., 263.
[205] This recalls Traffic Manager Bird's testimony relative to Wisconsin controversies before the Senate (Elkins) Committee, 1905.
[206] Using this term technically as described on p. [256], infra.
[207] Chapter XIV, p. [480], infra. The original correspondence setting forth these conditions is reprinted by the Senate (Elkins) Committee, 1905, Digest, App. III, p. 46. 21 I. C. C. Rep., 64, and 17 Idem, 335 are analogous cases.
[208] 7 Int. Com. Rep., 458: reprinted in our Railway Problems, chap. XII.
[209] Brief of Ed. Baxter, Alabama Midland Railway case, U. S. Supreme Court, p. 71; and Acworth, p. 83. Details in chap. XIV and XIX, infra.
[210] 14 I. C. C. Rep., 299.
[211] Details at pp. [245] and [610], infra.
[212] Interstate Commerce Reports, No. 696, decided June 25, 1904.