General Anatomy, Applied to Physiology and Medicine, Vol. 1 (of 3)

by Xavier Bichat

A very clear proof of this assertion, as it regards the nerves of animal life, is the peculiar kind of pain that is experienced in the tic douloureux, a kind that is unlike that of any other system. The sciatic disease, which has its seat in the nerve of the same name, has often been confounded with rheumatism, which affects the muscles or tendinous parts; but the difference of pain alone is sufficient to distinguish them. Mr. Chaussier has very judiciously taken for the first character of neuralgia, the nature of the pain. Every one knows the peculiar sensation of numbness and afterwards of pricking, that is felt when a superficial nerve, as the cubital, &c. is compressed. No other organ in the economy gives the same sensation from the same cause.

The animal sensibility of the nerves has another peculiar character, which consists in this, that the local irritation of a trunk often produces suffering in the whole branches. 1st. We know that when the cubital is compressed at the elbow, the pain extends along its whole course, and that it spreads over the whole external part of the leg, when the peroneal suffers. 2d. In the tic douloureux of the face, in the sciatic disease, and generally in all that class of diseases of which Mr. Chaussier has given a sketch under the name of neuralgia, an analogous observation may be made. 3d. When we wound, without dividing, one of the branches of the saphena, the internal cutaneous or muscular cutaneous, in the operation of blood-letting, the subjacent part frequently becomes numb, then painful and swelled; the irritated point is a centre, whence go forth, along the whole course of the nerves, painful irradiations, the consequences of which oftentimes cannot wholly be stopped, except by dividing the irritated trunk. Thus, in tic douloureux, the division of the nerves has sometimes overcome the disease, though we shall succeed less frequently here by these means than in the preceding case, where the affection is local, while here it is usually extended along the whole course of the nerve. 4th. I have irritated, in a dog, the sciatic nerve with nitric acid; the whole limb was swelled and painful the next day. I have at this time another, the whole of whose fore limb is swelled, because I passed a pin, two days before, through one of the anterior nerves, taking care to entangle some of the nervous filaments. This precaution is essential, for I passed a pin through the cellular texture that separates the filaments of the sciatic, without producing any effect. I should observe, however, that these different experiments do not always succeed, and that I have irritated a nerve at one point sometimes without producing any effect. 5th. The ligature of nerves is rarely followed by these accidents, because the communication with the brain is interrupted, by the very means that irritate, and because the medullary substance is flattened and its sensibility destroyed. However accidents have often happened from tying a nerve in the operation for aneurism, and though there is no real danger in making the ligature, all good practitioners advise that it should be avoided.

These different considerations prove in a positive manner, the influence that a portion of an irritated nerve has upon the animal sensibility of all the subjacent ramifications. Physicians do not give sufficient attention to this cause of pain, which is often very extensive without any apparent wound. An irritated nerve in a fracture of the ribs, in that of a limb, in a wound, in a tumour, &c. can produce at a distance a number of phenomena, the cause of which often escapes us, and which we should soon discover if we reflected upon the distribution of the branches going from the trunk of the nerve that is near the affected part.

Why in these phenomena, is the animal sensibility of the nerve below the affected part always raised? Why does this phenomenon never take place on the side of the brain, though it is in this direction that sensation is conveyed in a natural state? I know not.

No other system, among those all of whose parts are united like the nervous system, presents the same phenomenon. The arterial, the venous, the absorbent, never feel thus in their different ramifications, the affections of any one part of their trunk. The cellular is not affected at a distance by the diseases of one of its parts. In the mucous which is continuous, a part being irritated, oftentimes others also are affected, as when the stone in the bladder produces suffering in the glans penis; but there is always an intermediate portion more or less considerable, which remains without being painful; this is a real sympathy; whereas in the other, the whole nervous trunk suffers, from the affected part to the nervous extremities.

Influence of the nerves upon the animal sensibility of all the organs.

After having considered the animal sensibility in the nervous system itself, we must examine the part this system performs in this property described in relation to all the other organs, in which it is often the means of transmission between the organ that receives the sensation and the brain which perceives it. So that when any point of the nervous system suffers, as in the preceding cases, the portion of nerve that is between this point and the brain, serves to conduct the impression. Thus in animal contractility, the nerves are always intermediate to the brain, which is the principle of the motion, and to the muscle that executes the motion. There is, however, more difficulty in the first kind of transmission than in this, which, to be explained accurately, requires that we should distinguish two kinds of sensations perceived by the internal sensitive principle, 1st. the external; 2d. the internal.

The external sensations are of two orders, 1st. the general; 2d. the particular. The general sensations are derived from the sense of feeling, as we shall see; they indicate the presence of the bodies that are in contact with the external organs; they give the general impressions of heat and cold, moisture and dryness, hardness and softness, &c.; they produce a painful sensation when the external organs are torn, pricked, or acted upon by chemical agents, &c. These sensations may originate upon the skin, the eye, the ear, the mouth, the nostrils, upon the beginning of all the mucous surfaces, &c.; all the bodies in nature may produce them, and all the external organs may perceive them. 2d. The particular sensations are relative to certain determinate external bodies, or to particular emanations from surrounding bodies. Thus the eye exclusively perceives the light, the nose odours, the ear sounds, the tongue tastes, &c. These particular sensations are to a certain degree independent of the general ones; thus the eye may cease to see, the nose to smell, the ear to hear, the tongue to taste, and yet these different organs may preserve the faculty of perceiving the general attributes of heat and cold, moisture and dryness, &c. and may be the seat of real pain. Every day we see patients affected with gutta serena suffering from the eye, those affected with deafness having pains in the ear, &c. I have seen a man that was deprived of the sense of smell from the use of mercury, and who still would suffer very much if the pituitary membrane was irritated, &c. It is necessary, then, to distinguish in the organs of sense, that which belongs to the general sense of feeling, from that which is dependant upon the particular kind of feeling that each has separately.

If now we examine the part of the cerebral nerves in these two kinds of animal sensibility, it appears that they are equally essential to one and the other. 1st. This is without doubt as it regards the organs of sense; the sight, the hearing, the smell, or the taste, could never continue after a serious injury of the optic, auditory, olfactory, gustatory nerves, &c. I do not speak of the touch, which does not require, like the other senses, a peculiar modification of animal sensibility, but only the general feeling, with a peculiar form in the organs that are provided with it, so as to mould themselves to the figure of external bodies. 2d. As to the general sensations, whenever the cutaneous nerves cease entirely to act in any part of the skin, it becomes absolutely insensible; it may be pinched, irritated, burnt, &c. without feeling it. The perfect paralyses of sensation exhibit in man this phenomenon, which can easily be produced in animals by cutting or tying all the nerves that go to a limb. When the general feeling is left in the pituitary membrane after the loss of smell, the olfactory nerve is alone paralyzed; if the nerves that enter by the spheno-palatine foramen, through the anterior and posterior openings of the nostrils, cease also to act, then the general feeling is likewise lost. It is the same with regard to the other organs of sense.

I believe, then, that the nerves are actually necessary to the external sensations, whatever be their nature. Observe also, that all the organs with which external bodies can be in contact, as the dermoid system, all the origins of the mucous systems, and the organs of sense, are provided more or less abundantly with cerebral nerves; none of them receive the nerves of the ganglions. This external portion of the nervous system of animal life is very considerable; united to the portion that goes to the voluntary muscles, it forms almost the whole of this system, which has but very few appendices in the organs of internal life.