These nerves occasion evident sympathies in certain cases. It is to this that must be referred the different affections that Petit de Namur has produced in the organ of sight, by irritating their branches that are accessible. The development of the nerves of the ganglions follows nearly the same laws as that of those organs from which they emanate.
Let us observe in finishing this system, that there is no one that ought to arrest the attention of physiologists more. All the others present a series of phenomena already well known. Of this, we have hardly any knowledge. It does not present as yet, if we may so say, but some of the negative attributes of the nervous system of animal life. Thus it is without doubt that the organic nerves do not have the same part as the preceding in animal sensibility; that they are always foreign to contractility of the same species; that they have no direct influence upon the sensible organic, since as we shall see, we can cut or irritate them without destroying or hastening the motion of the muscles to which they go. But in knowing the parts they do not perform we are ignorant of those to which they are really destined. I have already observed that the difficulty of making experiments upon the ganglions and the plexuses, will much retard the progress of science. We have scarcely any branches upon the exterior upon which we can act.
Scarpa has collected the opinions of all who have preceded him, together with his own, upon the uses of the ganglions. I refer to what he has said upon this subject. As the general point of view in which he has presented these organs, and that in which I offer them here, differ essentially, the account that I have just given of the nerves of organic life has necessarily a general stamp wholly different from that of his work, a work, however, which, like all this author has published, confers the greatest honour upon the state of anatomy at the period in which we live.
I will terminate this article by an important reflection. If the nerves were only divided to form the ganglions, if these presented in their interior only differences of forms, and a very minute division of their filaments, why should they be so constant in animals? Many organs are wanting, vary, are presented under a thousand various forms in their different classes; on the contrary, the ganglions are constant. In those species even in which the cerebral system is imperfect, that of the ganglions is complete in its organization. Animal life diminishes and is contracted in an evident manner in most insects, in worms, &c. and generally in animals without verterbræ. The brain and the nerves become less evidently marked in proportion as this life is less perfect. The organic is, on the contrary, almost in its perfection in these animals. The ganglions and their nerves are also very evident. This remark has struck me in reading the researches of different authors upon the anatomy of the lower classes of animals; now, if the ganglions were not the centres of certain important functions of which we are ignorant, would they be so invariable in the animal organization?
[VASCULAR SYSTEM]
WITH RED BLOOD.
ARTICLE FIRST.
GENERAL REMARKS UPON THE CIRCULATION.
All authors have considered the circulation in the same way, since the celebrated discovery of Harvey. They have divided this function into two; one has been called the great circulation, the other, the small or pulmonary. The heart, being between the two, is their common centre. But in presenting in this point of view the course of the blood, it is difficult at first sight to perceive the general object of its course in our organs. The method in which I explain in my lectures this important phenomenon of the living economy, appears to me infinitely better calculated to give a great idea of it.