When we are not in the habit of finding immediately the absorbents, this method of searching for them by means of the glands, which are always very evident, infallibly succeeds; it cannot be used it is true in the extremities; but in the thorax and especially in the abdomen, it is very convenient. For example, by taking the inguinal glands we can trace these vessels to the thoracic duct, by injecting them, or even without. Some authors have advised making an opening in the gland and placing a tube in it; this rarely succeeds; it is much better to open the vessels that go from the gland, at the place where they go off.
The absorbents usually flat in the dead body, because they are empty, never exhibit in this state a diameter proportional to that which injections give them; whatever may be the varieties of capacity, the fluids that we force into them always increase this capacity. It is this flattening after death, that often makes us in attempting to open them with a lancet, cut through both their parietes, and thus render it more difficult to inject them.
The best proof of the extreme variety of the capacity of the absorbents, is the necessity of choosing particular bodies in order to inject them, the very great difficulties that often take place in finding them in some subjects, whilst they are seen immediately in others, and can be traced in the inferior and superior extremities, through the cellular texture, without having glands for a guide. It is not necessary then, after what has been said, to consider the caliber of the absorbent vessels in a determinate manner. Constantly varying, according to the state of the lymph they contain, they have no standard size to which we can refer their increase or diminution. This is the peculiarity of all the extensible and contractile canals, like those in the animal economy; it is that which prevents us from making any kind of calculation of their capacity.
These varieties of the absorbents are not general as in the veins, all the great trunks of which, for example, are simultaneously dilated when there is an obstruction in the lungs. Here sometimes one only, sometimes many branches enlarge; the others remain contracted. Sometimes the dilatation is general in a part, very often there are remarkable disproportions of capacity in the same vessel; it is double in one place what it is in another, though it has not received branches.
Authors have been much puzzled to determine the capacity of the thoracic duct. I believe it, for it is never found twice the same. These varieties do not depend on the constitution of the subject, but only on the functions, and the state in which these functions are found at death. Whether it be dilated above, contracted in the middle, exhibiting below a little bladder, called by some the reservoir of the chyle, &c. are circumstances the greatest number of which vary incessantly during life, according to the quantity, the nature of the lymph, and the obstacles to its course in this or that part. We find a hundred varieties of the thoracic duct and the absorbents in a hundred different subjects. The same subject has perhaps undergone these hundred varieties at the different periods of his life. If life returned and was destroyed many times in the same man, the venous and absorbent systems would exhibit a number of varieties equal to the number of times he had died.
We see from these considerations to what are reduced all these minute examinations of proportion in the capacity of the vessels, which fill our books of physiology.
If we compare the amount of the veins with those of the absorbents, it is difficult undoubtedly after what has been said, to form any precise idea of it; but we can make approximations. Now the absorbents do not appear hardly inferior to the veins; as to the branches, for example, the whole of the lymphatics of the lower limbs, placed by the side of the capacity of the venous trunks, does not appear much inferior to it. So in all the other parts, the veins being larger, but the absorbents more numerous, the disproportion is not very great.
From this it seems as if there would be but little difference between the trunks that terminate the veins and those that are the terminations of the exhalant system; however this difference is enormous, as we shall see.
Anastomoses of the Absorbents, in their course.
In the extremities, on the exterior of the trunk and the head, in the intermuscular spaces, &c. the anastomoses are very evident. We see branches of communication going from one absorbent to another; so that we might often say that these vessels are bifurcated. But this appearance is most usually deceptive; for each branch of the bifurcation is almost always as large as the trunk.