General Anatomy, Applied to Physiology and Medicine, Vol. 2 (of 3)

by Xavier Bichat

Every kind of rotation, opposition and circumduction are wanting in this genus, which is the most numerous, and which embraces the articulations of the carpus, the metacarpus, the tarsus and metatarsus, of the vertebræ between themselves by their articular processes, of the atlas with the occiput, of the humeral extremity of the clavicle, the sternal of the ribs, and the superior of the fibula. There is only a kind of slipping more or less obscure, and in which the osseous surfaces hardly ever leave each other. These surfaces are almost all plain, very close together, united by a considerable number of ligaments, and so strong in their connexion, that luxations hardly ever happen to them. Another reason moreover which renders them difficult, is that all this genus of articulations belongs almost wholly to short bones; now we know, that the motion imparted to a bone has a power of action which is in direct ratio of its length, and in the inverse of its smallness; for example, the same power applied to the tibial extremity of the femur, would luxate much more easily the ischiatic extremity, than if it acted upon the middle of this bone.

As the separate motion of each of the articulations of the fifth genus is almost nothing, nature usually unites several at the same place, for the purpose of producing a sensible, general motion, as we see in the carpus, the tarsus, the vertebræ, &c.; this is also a reason of the difficulty there is in luxating this genus of articulations. In fact, how great the general motions may be, two bones, taken separately, move but little upon each other; now it is only the extent of the motion of the two separate bones from each other, that can produce the displacement.

III. Observations upon the Immoveable Articulations.

We have only pointed out orders in this class, because its varieties are not sufficiently great to assign genera for them.

1st. The order of immoveable articulations with surfaces in juxta-position, is met with where the mechanism of the part alone is almost sufficient to insure the solidity of the bones which are found only placed at the side of each other, without holding by any insertion, and having only between them a slight cartilaginous layer; the superior maxillary bones, wedged in between the malar bones, the ossa ungues, the ethmoid, the ossa palati, the vomer, and the frontal bone, are supported more by the general mechanism of the face, than by any articular attachments that unite them to each other; thus the squamous portion of the temporal bone supports the parietal, more by the abutting arches, than by the manner of the union of their respective surfaces. Remove this general mechanism of the part, you will soon see all the articulations separate.

2d. The order of immoveable articulations with inserted surfaces, owes also in some measure its solidity to the general mechanism of the part; but this mechanism would be insufficient to insure this solidity; thus the bones, instead of having almost plain surfaces, exhibit very evident prominences and depressions which are inserted into each other, as we see in the articulations of the parietal bones with each other, with the sphenoid, the occipital, the frontal, &c.; these are called sutures. This order sometimes approximates the preceding, as in the union of the parietal and frontal bones, which, reciprocally aiding each other, are supported by this mechanism, more than by their insertions; sometimes it resembles the following order, as in the articulation of the occipital and parietal bones, in which the very deep insertions almost alone insure the solidity of the union. This order is never seen except upon the edges of the flat bones; the insertion of these edges compensates for their want of size, by multiplying the points of contact. The eminences and depressions forming the insertion are always of an irregular form and size. They are exactly fitted to each other, they are not alike in two bones of the same species, taken from two different subjects; so that we cannot unite to a detached left parietal bone, the right parietal bone of another individual. There has been much dispute upon the formation of the sutures; they are an effect of the laws of ossification, an effect which we can account for no more than we can for all the others, and all the general phenomena of growth; we shall see the progress they follow in this formation. This articular order is gradually effaced with age, and the bones unite together by the ossification of the thin intermediate cartilage. It is more rare that the preceding order disappears. I have seen, however, in extreme old age, different articulations of this order cease to be evident, those of the maxillary bones between themselves especially.

3d. The order of articulations with implanted surfaces borrows none of its solidity from the mechanism of the part; it owes it entirely to the relation of the surfaces, which are so united and embraced by each other, that displacement is impossible. There is but one example of this articular order, it is the teeth with the jaws.

Age does not here efface the articulation, and thus confound the two bones as in the preceding orders, because the medium of union is the palatine membrane, which belongs to the mucous system, and which by its organization has no tendency to ossification; whereas in the preceding cases, the intermediate cartilage has a natural disposition to become encrusted with the phosphate of lime.

IV. Of the Means of Union between the Articular Surfaces.

The articular surfaces would soon separate, if different organs did not retain them in place. These organs are the cartilages and the membranes for the immoveable articulations, the ligaments and the muscles for the moveable.