THE
DIPLOMATIC CORRESPONDENCE
OF THE
AMERICAN REVOLUTION
VOL. IV


THE
DIPLOMATIC CORRESPONDENCE
OF THE
AMERICAN REVOLUTION;

BEING

THE LETTERS OF BENJAMIN FRANKLIN, SILAS DEANE, JOHN
ADAMS, JOHN JAY, ARTHUR LEE, WILLIAM LEE, RALPH
IZARD, FRANCIS DANA, WILLIAM CARMICHAEL, HENRY
LAURENS, JOHN LAURENS, M. DE LAFAYETTE, M.
DUMAS, AND OTHERS, CONCERNING THE FOREIGN
RELATIONS OF THE UNITED STATES DURING
THE WHOLE REVOLUTION;

TOGETHER WITH

THE LETTERS IN REPLY FROM THE SECRET COMMITTEE OF
CONGRESS, AND THE SECRETARY OF FOREIGN AFFAIRS.

ALSO,

THE ENTIRE CORRESPONDENCE OF THE FRENCH MINISTERS,
GERARD AND LUZERNE, WITH CONGRESS.

Published under the Direction of the President of the United States, from
the original Manuscripts in the Department of State, conformably
to a Resolution of Congress, of March 27th, 1818.

EDITED

BY JARED SPARKS.

VOL. IV.

BOSTON:

NATHAN HALE AND GRAY & BOWEN;
G. & C. &. H. CARVILL, NEW YORK; P. THOMPSON, WASHINGTON.
1829.


HALE'S STEAM PRESS.
No. 6 Suffolk Buildings, Congress Street, Boston.


CONTENTS
OF THE
FOURTH VOLUME.

BENJAMIN FRANKLIN'S CORRESPONDENCE,
CONTINUED.

Page.
Count de Vergennes to B. Franklin. Versailles, August 23d, 1782,[3]
Expresses a wish to promote the commerce between France and America.
Thomas Townshend to Richard Oswald. Whitehall, September 1st, 1782,[4]
The King is ready to treat with the Commissioners on the footing of unconditional independence.
To Robert R. Livingston. Passy, Sept. 3d, 1782,[4]
Allowance made to his grandson for various public services.—Submits his own account to the disposal of Congress.—Encloses letters (inserted in the note) from Mr Jay and Mr Laurens, expressing their regard for his grandson.
To John Jay. Passy, September 4th, 1782,[9]
Mr Oswald's courier arrives, with directions to acknowledge the independence of America.
Robert R. Livingston to B. Franklin. Philadelphia, September 5th, 1782,[10]
Complains of want of information from Europe.—Movements of the British troops in the south.—Importance of the West India trade to the United States.—Right of the States to cut logwood.
Richard Oswald to B. Franklin. Paris, September 5th, 1782,[15]
Enclosing an extract from a letter of the Secretary of State, regarding the negotiation.
To Richard Oswald. Passy, Sept. 8th, 1782,[15]
Requesting a copy of the fourth article of his instructions, given in the note.
To Earl Grantham. Passy, Sept. 11th, 1782,[16]
Prospect of peace.
Robert R. Livingston to B. Franklin. Philadelphia, September 12th, 1782,[17]
Presenting Mr Paine's work addressed to the Abbé Raynal.
Robert R. Livingston to B. Franklin. Philadelphia, September 12th, 1782,[18]
Necessity of further supplies of money.
To David Hartley. Passy, September 17th, 1782,[18]
The preliminaries formerly received, inadmissible.
Robert R. Livingston to B. Franklin. Philadelphia, September 18th, 1782,[19]
Congress declines accepting Mr Laurens's resignation; alters Dr Franklin's powers.
Mr Secretary Townshend to Richard Oswald. Whitehall, September 20th, 1782,[20]
The commission passing with the change proposed by the American Commissioners.
Richard Oswald to B. Franklin. Paris, September 24th, 1782,[21]
Transmitting a copy of Mr Townshend's letter to himself.
Count de Vergennes to B. Franklin. Versailles, September 25th, 1782,[21]
Aspect of affairs dubious.
To Robert R. Livingston. Passy, Sept. 26th, 1782,[22]
Reply to his complaints of want of information.—Delays of the negotiation.
Count de Vergennes to B. Franklin. Versailles, October 3d, 1782,[23]
Granting the exequatur empowering the United States' Consul to act in France.
David Hartley to B. Franklin. Bath, Oct. 4th, 1782,[24]
Sends a proposition for a temporary commercial convention.—The dissolution of the union of the States apprehended.
To Robert R. Livingston. Passy, Oct. 14th, 1782,[25]
Progress of the negotiation.—Acknowledges the receipt of Ministers' salaries.
To John Adams. Passy, Oct. 15th, 1782,[28]
Delay in the negotiations.
From T. Townshend to B. Franklin. Whitehall, October 23d, 1782,[29]
Introducing Mr Strachey.
To Thomas Townshend. Passy, Nov. 4th, 1782,[30]
Regrets the obstructions to the negotiations.
To Robert R. Livingston. Passy, Nov. 7th, 1782,[31]
Introducing the Baron de Kermelin.
Robert R. Livingston to B. Franklin. Philadelphia, November 9th, 1782,[31]
Sweden proposes to acknowledge the independence of the United States.—Advantage of obtaining an acknowledgment from the States of Barbary.—Difficulties in the exchange of prisoners.—Affair of Lippincott.—Mr Boudinot elected President.
Robert R. Livingston to B. Franklin. Philadelphia, November 21st, 1782,[34]
Mr Jefferson added to the commission.—Mr Burgess, an English merchant, not permitted to settle in Boston.
To Richard Oswald. Passy, Nov. 26th, 1782,[36]
Indemnification of American royalists.—Resolutions of Congress on the subject.—Act of the Pennsylvania assembly for procuring an estimate of the damages committed by the British.—Characters of the royalists.—Inexpediency of discussing the measure.
Robert R. Livingston to B. Franklin. Philadelphia, November 27th, 1782,[44]
Messrs Lamarque and Fabru.
To Count de Vergennes. Passy, Nov. 29th, 1782,[45]
The preliminary articles of peace between England and the United States agreed on.
Robert R. Livingston to B. Franklin. Philadelphia, December 3d, 1782,[45]
To Robert R. Livingston. Passy, Dec. 4th, 1782,[46]
Encloses a copy of the preliminary articles.—Those between England and the other powers not signed.—No definitive treaty will be signed till all are agreed.
To Robert R. Livingston. Passy, Dec. 5th, 1782,[46]
Difficulties of conveying information to America.—Has asked for further supplies from France.—History of the negotiations.—The principal preliminaries between France and England agreed to.—Proceedings in regard to Sweden.
To Count de Vergennes. Passy, Dec. 15th, 1782,[54]
Informing him that a passport has been received from England for the Washington.
Count de Vergennes to B. Franklin. Versailles, December, 15th, 1782,[55]
Expresses his astonishment at the despatching of the Washington.—Complains that the preliminaries have been concluded without any communication with France.
To Count de Vergennes. Passy, Dec. 17th, 1782,[56]
Causes of the sailing of the Washington.—No peace will take place between England and America without the concurrence of France.
To Robert R. Livingston. Passy, Dec. 24th, 1782,[58]
The Swedish Ambassador exchanges full powers with Dr Franklin.
Robert R. Livingston to B. Franklin. Philadelphia, January 2d, 1783,[60]
Enclosing various resolutions of Congress.—Regrets the departure of the French fleet.—Financial distresses of America.
Robert R. Livingston to B. Franklin. Philadelphia, January 6th, 1783,[62]
Financial distress.—Subjects of negotiation.—Contingent expenses of foreign Ministers.
To Richard Oswald. Passy, January 14th, 1783,[66]
Enclosing propositions for abolishing privateering.
Count de Vergennes to B. Franklin. Versailles, January 18th, 1783,[69]
Desiring a conference with the Commissioners.
To Count de Vergennes. Passy, Jan. 18th, 1783,[70]
Promising to be present at the conference.
Benjamin Vaughan to B. Franklin. Paris, January 18th, 1783,[70]
Pressing him to be at Versailles the next day.—State of England.
To John Adams. Passy, January 19th, 1783,[72]
Acquainting him with Vergennes's desire for a conference.
To Robert R. Livingston. Passy, Jan. 21st, 1783,[72]
Preliminaries signed between France, Spain, and England.
John Jay to B. Franklin. Paris, Jan. 26th, 1783,[73]
Dr Franklin's grandson appointed Secretary to the commission without being solicited by him.
From M, Rosencrone, Minister of Foreign Affairs in Denmark, to M. de Walterstorff. Copenhagen, February 22d, 1783,[74]
Directing him to learn Dr Franklin's views in regard to a treaty of commerce between Denmark and the United States.
To Robert R. Livingston. Passy, March 7th, 1783,[76]
Treaty with Sweden signed.—The English Ministry changed.
David Hartley to B. Franklin. London, March 12th, 1783,[76]
Enclosing conciliatory propositions, and a sketch of a provisional treaty of commerce.—Changes in the Ministry.
To David Hartley. Passy, March 23d, 1783,[83]
Expresses a desire for a reconciliation.
Robert R. Livingston to B. Franklin. Philadelphia, March 26th, 1783,[84]
Regrets that the Commissioners should find it necessary to conceal anything from France; and that the commercial article is struck out.—The attempts to inflame the army.—Remits bills for the salaries of the Ministers.
From the city of Hamburg to Congress. March 29th, 1783,[88]
Proposing the establishment of commercial connexions.
David Hartley to B. Franklin. London, March 31st, 1783,[91]
Enclosing Supplemental Treaty between Great Britain and the United States of North America, separate article to be referred to the Definitive Treaty, and paper mentioned in the close of Mr Hartley's letter.
M. Salva to B. Franklin. Algiers, April 1st, 1783,[95]
Informing him of an attempt by the Algerines to seize American vessels.
To the Grand Master of Malta. Passy, April 6th, 1783,[96]
Requesting protection for Americans in the ports of Malta.
To M. Rosencrone. Passy, April 13th, 1783,[97]
Relative to a treaty between Denmark and the United States.—Asks reparation for the seizure of American prizes in the Danish ports.
To Robert R. Livingston. Passy, April 15th, 1783,[98]
Proposals of Denmark.—Delay in the negotiation of the Definitive Treaty.—Mr Hartley substituted in the room of Mr Oswald.—Propositions for the renewal of the commerce between England and the United States.—Receives applications of persons wishing to emigrate to America.—Financial embarrassments of France.
Charles J. Fox to B. Franklin. St James's, April 19th, 1783,[104]
Introducing Mr Hartley.—Expresses a desire to effect a reconciliation of the two nations.
To Robert R. Livingston. Passy, April 27th, 1783,[104]
Introducing the Count del Veome.
Count de Vergennes to B. Franklin. Versailles, May 5th, 1783,[105]
Acknowledges the receipt of a copy of the three articles discussed by the Commissioners and Mr Hartley.—Complains of the infrequent appearance of the Commissioners at Court.
To Count de Vergennes. Passy, May 5th, 1783,[105]
The Commissioners prevented by sickness from appearing at Court.
To David Hartley. Passy, May 8th, 1783,[106]
Desires the abolition of privateering.
Robert R. Livingston to B. Franklin. Philadelphia, May 9th, 1783,[107]
Infringements of the Provisional Treaty by the British.—Arrival of vessels in the American ports.
Robert R. Livingston to B. Franklin. Philadelphia, May 31st, 1783,[109]
Determination of the Court of Appeals in case of the Portuguese vessel.—Recommends the demands on Denmark to be urged.
To Robert R. Livingston. Passy, June 12th, 1783,[110]
The ratification of the treaty with Sweden received.—Treaty with Denmark going on.—Portugal proposes to treat.—Delay of the Definitive Treaty with England.—Dr Bancroft.
The Ambassador from Sweden to B. Franklin. Paris, June 13th, 1783,[112]
Requesting that Mr W. T. Franklin may be sent to the Swedish Court.
From the Grand Master of Malta to B. Franklin. Malta, June 21st, 1783, 112
Promising protection to Americans in the ports of Malta.
To Henry Laurens. Passy, July 6th, 1783,[113]
Delays of the negotiations.—Mr Laurens's presence necessary.
From M. Rosencrone, Minister of Denmark, to B. Franklin. Copenhagen, July 8th, 1783,[114]
Enclosing a Counter Project of a Treaty between the United States and Denmark.
Explanation of the Counter Project of a Treaty of Amity and Commerce received from Denmark,[130]
Giacomo F. Crocco to B. Franklin. Cadiz, July 15th, 1783,[135]
Informing him that the Emperor of Morocco is ready to enter into a treaty with the United States.
To Robert R. Livingston. Passy, July 22d, 1783,[136]
Justifies the signature of the Provisional Treaty without communicating to the French Court.—Expresses his confidence in France.—Contrary opinion of one of his colleagues.—Reason for striking a commercial article out of the preliminaries proposed.—Advantages of free trade.—Moderation of France.—The Ambassador of Portugal desires to form a treaty with the United States.—Correspondence with the Danish Minister.—Inclination of Saxony and Prussia to engage in the American commerce.—Affair of the Bon Homme Richard.—Recommends his grandson for the diplomatic service.—General desire of the European powers to engage in commerce with the United States.—The American constitutions translated into French, produce a favorable effect.—Dangers from the Barbary powers.—Kindness of Mr Wren to the American prisoners near Portsmouth.
Plan of a Treaty with Portugal,[150]
Enclosed in the preceding.
From the Pope's Nuncio to B. Franklin,[158]
Proposing the appointment of an Apostolical Vicar Bishop in the United States.
To Count de Vergennes. Passy, Aug. 16th, 1783,[159]
The English Ministry reject the propositions of the Commissioners and of their own Ministers.—Propose the preliminaries slightly changed as a definitive treaty.—The other Commissioners are inclined to sign this.
M. de Rayneval to B. Franklin. Versailles, August 29th, 1783,[160]
Count de Vergennes consents to the signing the treaty at Paris instead of Versailles.
To the President of Congress. Passy, August 31st, 1783,[161]
The English Ministry have agreed to sign the articles formerly proposed as a definitive treaty.
To David Hartley. Passy, September 6th, 1783,[161]
Expresses his esteem for Mr Fox.—Intelligence of the American people.—Their misunderstandings much exaggerated.—Complains of the delay in evacuating New York.
To John Jay. Passy, September 10th, 1783,[163]
Quotes a letter from America, which accuses him of favoring France, in her opposition to granting the fishery, and the whole territory demanded by the Americans.—Appeals to Mr Jay for the falsehood of the assertion.
John Jay to B. Franklin. Passy, Sept, 11th, 1783,[164]
Dr Franklin agreed and acted with the other Commissioners respecting the boundaries and fisheries.—On former occasions he had also maintained the same claims on these points.
John Adams to B. Franklin. Passy, September 13th, 1783,[165]
Dr Franklin agreed with the other Commissioners in the management of the negotiation.
To the President of Congress. Passy, September 13th, 1783,[166]
Relations with Morocco; with Portugal.—False reports of disunion, &c. in the United States injurious to the American cause.—Count de Vergennes refuses to sign the Definitive Treaty with England before that between England and the United States was signed.
To Lewis R. Morris. Passy, Sept. 14th, 1783,[169]
Relative to accounts.
David Hartley to B. Franklin. Bath, September 24th, 1783,[170]
Expects to receive instructions for a convention on the basis, that American ships shall not bring foreign manufactures into Great Britain, nor trade directly between the West Indies and Great Britain.
To the President of Congress. Passy, September 27th, 1783,[171]
Encloses a copy of the Definitive Treaty.—Expects Mr Hartley to negotiate a treaty of commerce.
To David Hartley. Passy, October 16th, 1783,[172]
Advantages of a perpetual peace between England, France, and America.
To David Hartley. Passy, October 22d, 1783,[173]
Reports of the divisions in America unfounded.
To the President of Congress. Passy, November 1st, 1783,[173]
Financial difficulties of France; failure of payment by the Caisse d'Escompte.—Relations with Sweden, Denmark, and Portugal.—Claims of Du Calvet for supplies to the army in Canada.
Giacomo Francisco Crocco to B. Franklin. Cadiz, November 25th, 1783,[176]
Informs Dr Franklin that he is appointed by the Emperor of Morocco to conduct to that Court the Minister of the United States.—Demands $1500 for his expenses to Paris.
To William Carmichael. Passy, Dec. 15th, 1783,[177]
Accounts of the proceedings and demands of M. Crocco.
To Giacomo Francisco Crocco. Passy, December 15th, 1783,[179]
Mr Jay is the suitable person for M. Crocco's application.
To the President of Congress. Passy, December 25th, 1783,[180]
Mr Hartley refuses to go to Versailles to sign the Definitive Treaty.—Ill will of the British Court towards America.—Has the American constitutions translated in French, which produce a favorable impression.—Relations with Denmark, Portugal, Morocco, and Germany.—The expense of Commodore Jones's expedition paid entirely by the King of France.
To Robert Morris. Passy, Dec. 25th, 1783,[187]
Unreasonableness of the complaints against taxes.—Property is the creature of society.—Lafayette has conferences with the Ministers, relative to the new commercial regulations.
To the President of Congress. Passy, December 26th, 1783,[188]
Recommends Mr Hodgson as Consul in London.
David Hartley to B. Franklin. London, March 2d, 1784,[189]
Promises to apply for the despatch of the ratification of the treaty by Great Britain, on the arrival of that by Congress.
To Charles Thompson. Passy, March 9th, 1784,[190]
Ratifications exchanged with Sweden.—Receives numerous applications from persons wishing to settle in the United States.
To the President of Congress. Passy, May 12th, 1784,[191]
Mr Hartley arrives to exchange ratifications of the Definitive Treaty.—Proclamation relative to American commerce with the British colonies.—Proposed regulations of the commerce with the French colonies.
David Hartley to B. Franklin. Paris, June 1st, 1784,[192]
Defects of form in the ratification of the treaty by Congress.
To David Hartley. Passy, June 2d, 1784,[193]
Answers to the objections made in the preceding letter.
To the President of Congress. Passy, June 16th, 1784,[196]
Symptoms of resentment against America on the part of Great Britain.
Consular Convention,[198]
Consular convention between France and the United States.
To Count de Mercy Argenteau. Passy, July 30th, 1784,[208]
Dr Franklin, Mr Jefferson, and Mr Adams are appointed to negotiate a treaty of commerce with the empire.
Count de Mercy Argenteau to B. Franklin. Paris, July 30th, 1784,[209]
Assures Dr Franklin of the disposition of the Emperor to form commercial connexions with the United States.
Count de Vergennes to B. Franklin. Versailles, August 27th, 1784,[210]
Requesting a declaration, in an official form, that Congress will in no case treat any nation more favorably than France in commercial privileges.
To Count de Vergennes. Passy, Sept. 3d, 1784,[210]
Transmits a Resolution of Congress, declaring that no people shall be placed on more advantageous ground in the commerce with the United States than the French subjects.
Count de Vergennes to B. Franklin. Versailles, September 9th, 1784,[211]
Expresses the satisfaction of the King with the resolution of Congress, contained in the preceding letter.—The United States shall enjoy a complete reciprocity in France.
Count de Mercy Argenteau to B. Franklin. Paris, September 28th, 1784,[211]
The Emperor has agreed to the propositions of Congress concerning commercial regulations between the two powers.
To Charles Thompson. Passy, October 16th, 1784,[212]
The Commissioners have made propositions of treating to all the European powers.
To Charles Thompson. Passy, Nov. 11th, 1784,[213]
To the President of Congress. Passy, February 8th, 1785,[213]
Receives the Resolve of Congress, respecting the Consular convention, too late to suspend the signing.
To the President of Congress. Passy, April 12th, 1785,[214]
Introducing M. de Chaumont, the younger.
To Count de Vergennes. Passy, May 3d, 1785,[215]
Informs him that he has received permission to return to America.
M. de Rayneval to B. Franklin. Versailles, May 8th, 1785,[216]
Regrets to hear of his approaching departure from France.
To John Jay, Secretary of Foreign Affairs. Passy, May 10th, 1785,[216]
Prepares for his return to America.
To Charles Thompson. Passy, May 10th, 1785,[217]
Count de Vergennes to B. Franklin. Versailles, May 22d, 1785,[217]
Regrets his intended departure for the United States.—Assures him of the esteem of the King.
To Thomas Barclay. Passy, June 19th, 1785,[218]
Relative to his charges for salary as Minister Plenipotentiary.
M. de Castries to B. Franklin. Versailles, July 10th, 1785,[220]
Would have ordered a frigate for Dr Franklin, had he sooner known of his intention of leaving France.
To John Jay, Secretary of Foreign Affairs. Philadelphia, September 19th, 1785,[220]
Informs him of his arrival in the United States.—Signs a treaty of commerce and friendship with Prussia before leaving Europe.
To Mr Grand, banker at Paris. Philadelphia, July 11, 1786,[222]
Requests information concerning the gift of three millions of livres from the King, of which only two millions appear in the accounts.
M. Durival to Mr Grand. Versailles, August 30th, 1786,[223]
The King's gift amounted to three millions, independently of the million advanced to the United States by the Farmers-General.
M. Durival to Mr Grand. Versailles, September 5th, 1786,[224]
Declines communicating to him the receipt taken for the first million advanced by the King, June 10th, 1776.
Mr Grand to B. Franklin. Paris, Sept. 9th, 1786,[224]
States that he received only three millions; the first million having been advanced previous to his appointment.
M. Durival to Mr Grand. Versailles, September 10th, 1786,[225]
The Minister still persists in declining to communicate the receipt for the first million to Mr Grand.
Mr Grand to B. Franklin. Paris, Sept. 12th, 1786,[226]
Professes himself unable to discover who received the first million.
To Charles Thompson. Philadelphia, January 27th, 1787,[226]
Conjectures that the million advanced June 10th, 1776, must have been delivered to Beaumarchais.
To the President of Congress. Philadelphia, November 29th, 1788,[228]
Requesting the settlement of his accounts, which have been three years before Congress, it having been asserted in the newspapers that he is indebted to the United States.

JOHN ADAMS' CORRESPONDENCE.
Committee of Foreign Affairs to John Adams. York, in Pennsylvania, December 3d, 1777,[241]
Enclosing his commission as Commissioner to France.
To Henry Laurens, President of Congress. Braintree, December 23d, 1777,[242]
Accepting his appointment as Commissioner.
To the Committee of Foreign Affairs. Braintree, December 24th, 1777,[243]
Acknowledging the receipt of his commission, with other documents accompanying.
To Samuel Adams. Passy, May 21st, 1778,[244]
State of Europe.—Disposition of the powers towards America.—Affairs of the United States in France in great confusion.—Expenses of the Commissioners. (Information on this subject in the note, p. 245.)—Proposes remedies.
To the Commercial Committee. Passy, May 24th, 1778,[248]
American affairs in France in great confusion; attended with much delay and expense.—Remedies proposed.
To James Lovell. Passy, July 9th, 1778,[250]
The ratification of the treaty with France gives great satisfaction in that country.—War between France and England appears inevitable.—Effect of the war of Bavarian succession on the policy of Germany.
To James Lovell. Passy, July 26th, 1778,[251]
Mr Deane's claims, services, and complaints.—Victories of the army the best negotiators in Europe.
To the President of Congress. Passy, July 27th, 1778,[254]
Policy of England to separate America from France.
To Samuel Adams. Passy, July 28th, 1778,[256]
British Commissioners authorised to offer independence to America, on condition of her breaking off her connexions with France.—America is bound by alliances to reject such proposals.—The proximity of the British colonies to the United States will always render Great Britain an enemy.—France and America reciprocally important to each other.—The alliance of France will secure the rest of the continent.—Necessity of imposing taxes in the United States to support the national credit.
To James Warren. Passy, August 4th, 1778,[259]
The proceedings of Congress relative to the Conciliatory Bills, ratification of the treaty, answer to the Commissioners, &c. produce a favorable effect in Europe.—Expresses his abhorrence of the idea of infidelity to France.—Dangers to the Protestant religion from the French alliance imaginary.—Probable effects of the separation of America on the power of Great Britain.
To Richard Henry Lee. Passy, Aug. 5th, 1778,[262]
Necessity of taxation to support the national credit.—Dissensions among the American agents.
To Henry Laurens, President of Congress. Passy, August 27th, 1778,[266]
To the President of Congress. Passy, September 7th, 1778,[266]
Great preparations of Spain; their object is unknown.
To the President of Congress. Passy, September 11th, 1778,[267]
To M. Ray de Chaumont. Passy, Sept. 15th, 1778,[268]
Requesting him to fix the rent of his house, occupied by Mr Adams and Dr Franklin.
M. Ray de Chaumont to John Adams. Passy, September 18th, 1778,[269]
Declines receiving any compensation for his house.
To the President of Congress. Passy, September 20th, 1778,[270]
The American refugees in England encourage the notion, that another campaign will compel the colonies to return to submission.—The marine and finances of England are in a miserable condition.
To Ralph Izard. Passy, September 25th, 1778,[271]
Agriculture the most essential interest of America, even in Massachusetts.—Evils of the fisheries; they promote luxury, and injure morals; are useful as a source of naval power.
To Ralph Izard. Passy, October 2d, 1778,[274]
Relative to the insertion of the words 'indefinite and exclusive' in the tenth article of the Treaty of Amity and Commerce.
To the President of Congress. Passy, October 2d, 1778,[277]
Committee of Foreign Affairs to John Adams. Philadelphia, October 28th, 1778,[277]
Requests him to keep the Commissioners at the other Courts informed of all events in America.
To the President of Congress. Passy, December 3d, 1778,[278]
The opinion that the English intend to withdraw from the United States, unfounded.—The British power there must be destroyed.
To Elbridge Gerry. Passy, December 5th, 1778,[279]
Reserve of the French Ministry towards the Commissioners.—Dissensions of the Commissioners.
To the President of Congress. Passy, December 6th, 1778,[281]
Enclosing the King's speech.
To Roger Sherman. Passy, December 6th, 1778,[282]
Value and dangers of the connexion with France.
To the President of Congress. Passy, December 8th, 1778,[283]
Plan of the British to prosecute the war by devastating the country.—The war is not a ministerial but a national one.
The Commissioners to John Paul Jones. Passy, May 25th, 1778,[284]
Congratulations on his successes.—Prospect of obtaining an exchange of prisoners.—Refuse the payment of his bill of exchange drawn on the Commissioners.—Offer to furnish his men with slops.
The Commissioners to John Paul Jones. Passy, June 3d, 1778,[287]
Desiring the release of Lieut. Simpson under arrest for disobeying orders.
The Commissioners to Lieut. Simpson, of the Ranger. Passy, June 3d, 1778,[288]
The Commissioners have requested Captain Jones to set him at liberty.
To the Committee of Foreign Affairs. Passy, February 1st, 1779,[289]
Difficult to obtain a loan in Europe.
To Samuel Adams. Passy, February 14th, 1779,[290]
Expresses his satisfaction with the appointment of Dr Franklin as Minister Plenipotentiary to France.—Disputes of the former Commissioners.—The French Court and nation unanimous in support of American independence.—The policy of France popular in Europe.—Discontents in Great Britain.
To Count de Vergennes. Passy, Feb. 16th, 1779,[294]
The recall of his commission has rendered unnecessary the conference he had requested with the Minister relative to Mr Deane's address.
To the Marquis de Lafayette. Passy, February 21st, 1779,[295]
Financial difficulties of America would be remedied by relieving the country of the necessity of supporting large forces; the naval superiority of France in the American seas would easily effect this relief.
Count de Vergennes to John Adams. Versailles, February 21st, 1779,[298]
Desires an interview with Mr Adams, to express the satisfaction of the King with his conduct.
To Count de Vergennes. Passy, Feb. 27th, 1779,[299]
Expresses his sense of the King's indulgent sentiments.
To John Jay, President of Congress. Passy, February 27th, 1779,[299]
Intends to return to America.—Tumults in Great Britain.—Little prospect of obtaining a loan in Europe.—Economy and taxation necessary to relieve the financial difficulties.
To John Jay, President of Congress. Passy, March 1st, 1779,[302]
Conditions of the British loan.
M. de Lafayette to John Adams. St Germain, April 9th, 1779,[303]
Asks leave to send a French officer to America with Mr Adams.
To Arthur Lee. L'Orient, June 9th, 1779,[305]
Relative to the charges made against Mr Lee.
To the President of Congress. Braintree, August 3d, 1779,[307]
Returns home in the Sensible, in company with M. de la Luzerne.—Character of the Minister, Luzerne; of the Secretary to the Embassy, Marbois.
To the President of Congress. Braintree, August 4th, 1779,[311]
View of the state of Europe.—France.—War of Bavarian succession.—Great Britain.—Holland.—Spain.—Portugal.—German States.—Austria.—Prussia.—The northern powers.—Italy.
To James Lovell. Braintree, August 13th, 1779,[325]
Enclosing letters concerning Count de Vergennes and Arthur Lee.
To the President of Congress. Braintree, September 10th, 1779,[326]
Requesting a copy of the complaints, evidences, witnesses, &c. reported by a Committee of Congress to exist against the Commissioners.
To the President of Congress. Boston, September 23d, 1779,[327]
To James Lovell. Braintree, October 17th, 1779,[328]
Regrets Mr Lee's recall.—Denies Mr Izard's charges.
To Samuel Huntington, President of Congress. Braintree, October 19th, 1779,[331]
British whale fishery on the South American coast.—The crews American prisoners of war.
To Samuel Huntington, President of Congress. Braintree, October 20th, 1779,[333]
Present of an engraving of the exploit of William Tell for each State from Mr Schweighauser.
To the President of Congress. Braintree, October 21st, 1779,[333]
Advantages of convoys for the American trade; of maintaining a superiority of naval power in the American seas.
To Henry Laurens. Braintree, Oct. 25th, 1779,[335]
His appointment as Commissioner not sought by him.—Opinion of Colonel Laurens's abilities.—Difficulties at Philadelphia.
To the President of Congress. Braintree, November 4th, 1779,[337]
Accepting the commission of Minister for negotiating peace and commerce with Great Britain.
Instructions for a treaty of peace with Great Britain,[339]
Instructions for a treaty of commerce with Great Britain,[342]
To the President of Congress. Braintree, November 7th, 1779,[344]
Transmits a copy of the letter book of the Commissioners at the Court of Versailles.
To B. Franklin. Ferrol, December 8th, 1779,[345]
Informs him of his arrival at Ferrol, being obliged to put in there, in consequence of a leak.
To the President of Congress. Ferrol, December 11th, 1779,[346]
Arrival at Ferrol.—Attentions of the Spanish and French officers.
To the President of Congress. Corunna, December 16th, 1779,[348]
Disposition of Spain.—Report of the intended mediation of Russia on the basis of independence.
To the Governor of Corunna. Corunna, December 18th, 1779,[351]
Names of the persons for whom Mr Adams wishes for passports to Bayonne.
M. de Sartine to John Adams. Versailles, December 31st, 1779,[352]
To the President of Congress. Bilboa, January 16th, 1780,[352]
Sketch of the northwestern provinces of Spain.
To the Count de Vergennes. Paris, Feb. 12th, 1780,[360]
Informs him of his mission.—Intends to take no measures without consulting the French Ministers.—Requests advice as to the course to be pursued in making known his mission.
To M. de Sartine. Paris, February 13th, 1780,[363]
Thanks for his being permitted a passage in the Sensible.
Count de Vergennes to John Adams. Versailles, February 15th, 1780,[363]
Advises him to conceal the object of his commission for a time.
To the President of Congress. Paris, February 15th, 1780,[364]
Arrives in Paris.—Has a conference with the French Ministers.—Supplies to be sent from France.—Preparations of England.
To the President of Congress. Paris, February 17th, 1780,[366]
Supplied with money by M. Lagoanere at Corunna.
To the Marquis de Lafayette. Paris, February 18th, 1780,[368]
Requesting information concerning the reports circulated by the British, of their preparations for the ensuing campaign.
To M. Genet, First Secretary for the department of Foreign Affairs. Paris, February 18th, 1780,[370]
Same subject as the preceding.
M. de Lafayette to John Adams. Paris, February 19th, 1780,[371]
The accounts of the British abovementioned are without foundation.
To the President of Congress. Paris, February 19th, 1780,[373]
False reports circulated by the British as to their means for the next campaign.—Naval preparations of France.—The importance of the colonies in maintaining the naval supremacy of Great Britain, will render her averse to a peace.
To the Count de Vergennes. Paris, Feb. 19th, 1780,[376]
His instructions contain nothing inconsistent with the treaty between France and the United States.
M. Genet to John Adams. Versailles, February 20th, 1780,[377]
Falsehood of the British reports mentioned pp. 368, 370.
To the President of Congress. Paris, February 20th, 1780,[378]
Exaggeration of the English successes in South America and the United States.—Account of his proceedings in France.—Application of England to Russia rejected.
To John Jay, Minister Plenipotentiary at Madrid. Paris, February 22d, 1780,[380]
Congratulates him on his arrival.—Communication with America more easy from Spain than from France.
To the President of Congress. Paris, February 23d, 1780,[382]
Transmitting French journals; gives their character.
To Samuel Adams. Paris, February 23d, 1780,[383]
Committees of Correspondence established in England.—Naval preparations of France.—Supplies for the American army from that power.
To General James Warren. Paris, Feb. 23d, 1780,[385]
French naval force at sea, and preparing at Brest.—British resources.
Count de Vergennes to John Adams. Versailles, February 24th, 1780,[386]
Expresses himself satisfied with Mr Adams's powers and instructions.—Advises secrecy in regard to his powers for negotiating a treaty of commerce.—His mission to negotiate a peace will be publicly announced.
To the Count de Vergennes. Paris, February 25th, 1780,[388]
Promises to comply with the advice contained in the preceding letter.
To the President of Congress. Paris, February 25th, 1780,[388]
Committees of Correspondence formed in Ireland and England.
To the President of Congress. Paris, February 27th, 1780,[389]
Preparations at Brest composed of land and sea forces.—Violence of parties in England.—Seizure of Dutch ships by the English alienates the Dutch.
To Dr Cooper of Boston. Paris, Feb. 28th, 1780,[392]
The Americans must not indulge the hope of peace.
To the President of Congress. Paris, February 29th, 1780,[393]
M. Genet translates the American constitutions.
To the President of Congress. Paris, March 3d, 1780,[394]
Character of Admiral Rodney.—Intends to adopt a system of devastation on the American coast.
To the President of Congress. Paris, March 4th, 1780,[395]
Successes of Admiral Rodney.—French naval force.
To Samuel Adams. Paris, March 4th, 1780,[399]
Mr Izard's views of the policy to be adopted at the French Court.—Mr Adams's opinions different.
To the President of Congress. Paris, March 8th, 1780,[400]
Is presented at Court.
To the President of Congress. Paris, March 8th, 1780,[401]
To the President of Congress. Paris, March 10th, 1780,[401]
Rodney's successes.
To the President of Congress. Passy, March 12th, 1780,[403]
Quotes an observation of M. de Mably concerning the establishment of the English empire of the sea.—The Americans must produce a balance of power by sea.—English naval force.
To Edmund Jennings. Paris, March 12th, 1780,[407]
Chatham's doctrine of a constitutional impossibility of acknowledging the independence of America.—Effects of the interposition of France and Spain on the acknowledgment.
To the President of Congress. Passy, March 14th, 1780,[411]
Clinton's expedition.—State of affairs in England and Ireland.
To the President of Congress. Passy, March 14th, 1780,[414]
English forces.
To James Lovell. Paris, March 16th, 1780,[415]
Refugees.—His accounts.—Reason of avoiding giving accounts of the state of affairs in France.—Approves the plan of distinct ministers.
To the President of Congress. Paris, March 18th, 1780,[418]
French military preparations.—Armed neutrality of the northern powers.
To the President of Congress. Paris, March 19th, 1780,[420]
British fleet in the channel.—Reported capture of despatches from the Court of France.
To the President of Congress. Paris, March 20th, 1780,[422]
Transmits the Morning Post and the General Advertiser.—Virulence of parties.
To the Count de Vergennes. Paris, March 21st, 1780,[423]
Informing the Minister that his presentation at Court has not been announced.
To William Lee. Paris, March 21st, 1780,[424]
Rumors of change in the British Ministry.—A truce impossible.
To the President of Congress. Paris, March 23d, 1780,[426]
The abolition of the Board of Trade and Plantations carried against the Ministry.—The opposition are disposed only to a separate treaty.—The fatal consequences of a truce to America.
To the President of Congress. Paris, March 24th, 1780,[429]
Discussions on salaries of colonial officers, and pensions of refugees.—Requests instructions as to compensations to the refugees in case of negotiations; and whether the citizens of each power shall have the right of citizens in the dominions of the other.
To the President of Congress. Paris, March 24th, 1780,[431]
Account of Admiral Rodney's cruise. Preparations in Spain.—Dissensions in England.
To the President of Congress. Paris, March 26th, 1780,[435]
Free commerce with the colonies granted to Ireland.—Proceeding in the Irish Parliament thereon.—State of Ireland.
To the President of Congress. Paris, March 29th, 1780,[440]
Affairs of Holland.—History of the dispute with England.
Count de Vergennes to John Adams. Versailles, March 30th, 1780,[443]
Presentations of Ministers are not announced in the Gazette de France.—Proposes to announce it in the Mercure.
To the Count de Vergennes. Paris, March 30th, 1780,[444]
Approves the announcement of his presentation in the Mercure.
To the President of Congress. Paris, March 30th, 1780,[445]
Explains the reason, why his presentation was not announced in the Gazette.—Does not approve of the concealment of his powers to treat of commerce.
To the President of Congress. Paris, March 30th, 1780,[446]
Dispute between the Irish volunteers and the royal troops at Dublin.
To Arthur Lee, at L'Orient. Paris, March 31st, 1780,[448]
Difficulties between the Commissioners.
To the President of Congress. Paris, April 3d, 1780,[449]
Policy of the Stadtholder.—Inclination of the Dutch nation.—Petition to their High Mightinesses to equip a naval force.—Memorial of Sir J. Yorke.—Answer of the States-General.—Reply of Sir J. Yorke.
To the President of Congress. Paris, April 3d, 1780,[458]
Memorial of the Congress of County Committees recommending reforms in the expenditure, in elections, annual Parliaments, &c.—Proceedings of particular committees thereon.
To the President of Congress. Paris, April 4th, 1780,[465]
Attack of an English privateer on a Swedish frigate.
To the President of Congress. Paris, April 6th, 1780,[466]
Decree of the Admiralty in the case of a Dutch ship, captured by an English man-of-war, while sailing for a French port, loaded with naval stores under a Dutch convoy.
To the President of Congress. Paris, April 7th, 1780,[473]
Rumors of an armed neutrality of the northern powers.—Violations of the neutrality of the Turkish waters by the English and French naval forces.—Representations of the Porte.—Sentiments of Russia on the English attack of the Dutch convoy.
To William Carmichael, Secretary of the American Embassy at Madrid. Paris, April 8th, 1780,[480]
Reason for the delays of Spain.—Events in America.—State of England.
To the President of Congress. Paris, April 8th, 1780,[483]
List of the naval losses of the English since the beginning of the war.
To the President of Congress. Paris, April 10th, 1780,[484]
Proceedings of England and Holland relative to the granting of convoys to Dutch ships.
To the President of Congress. Paris, April 10th, 1780,[488]
Memorial of the Russian Envoy, Prince Gallitzin, to the States General, communicating the declaration of his Court to the belligerent powers, and inviting the concurrence of the States.—The declaration mentioned in the foregoing Memorial, asserting the determination of Russia to protect her subjects in the rights of neutrals, and proposing to establish the principles that free ships make free goods; that an efficient force is necessary to constitute a blockade, &c.
To the President of Congress. Paris, April 11th, 1780,[493]
Proceedings of the counties, &c. in England in favor of reforms.—Resolutions of the county of York in favor of economical and parliamentary reform, of triennial parliaments, and condemning the carrying on of the war in America.
To the President of Congress. Paris, April 14th, 1780,[497]
Violations of neutrality.—Prospect of an armed neutrality of the north.—Proceedings in Holland.
To the President of Congress. Paris, April 15th, 1780,[501]
Quotations from the European papers.—From an English paper proposing the independence of the United States, the giving up of Nova Scotia and Canada.—Russia gives notice to France that she is arming to protect her neutrality.
To M. de Sartine. Paris, April 16th, 1780,[507]

THE
CORRESPONDENCE
OF
BENJAMIN FRANKLIN,

COMMISSIONER AND MINISTER PLENIPOTENTIARY TO
THE COURT OF FRANCE, AND COMMISSIONER
FOR NEGOTIATING A PEACE.


THE
CORRESPONDENCE
OF
BENJAMIN FRANKLIN.


CORRESPONDENCE CONTINUED.


COUNT DE VERGENNES TO B. FRANKLIN.

Translation.

Versailles, August 23d, 1782.

Sir,

I have received the letter you did me the honor of writing to me on the 9th instant, as well as the memorial enclosed in it. I communicated the paper to the Marquis de Castries, and I make no doubt, but that the Minister will take into consideration its contents, as far as circumstances will permit. We are desirous to adopt every measure, that may tend to the prosperity of the commerce established between France and the United States, and we shall neglect nothing to accomplish this object to the universal satisfaction of the two countries. Congress will greatly facilitate our labor, if they will communicate their ideas and wishes on this subject; and I make the request with greater confidence, as I am convinced that that assembly desires as much as we do to establish, on an advantageous and solid basis, the commercial concerns between France and America.

I have the honor to be, &c.

DE VERGENNES.


THOMAS TOWNSHEND TO RICHARD OSWALD.

Whitehall, September 1st, 1782.

Sir,

I have received and laid before the King your letters of the 17th, 18th, and 21st ultimo; and I am commanded to signify to you his Majesty's approbation of your conduct in communicating to the American Commissioners the fourth article of your instructions; which could not but convince them, that the negotiation for peace, and the cession of independence to the Thirteen United Colonies, were intended to be carried on and concluded with the Commissioners in Europe.

Those gentlemen having expressed their satisfaction concerning that article, it is hoped they will not entertain a doubt of his Majesty's determination to exercise, in the fullest extent, the powers with which the act of Parliament has invested him, by granting to America, full, complete, and unconditional independence, in the most explicit manner, as an article of treaty.

T. TOWNSHEND.


TO ROBERT R. LIVINGSTON.

Passy, September 3d, 1782.

Sir,

I have just received yours, No. 13, dated the 23d of June. The accounts of the general sentiments of our people, respecting propositions from England, and the rejoicings on the birth of the Dauphin, give pleasure here; and it affords me much satisfaction to find the conduct of Congress approved by all who hear or speak of it, and to see all the marks of a constantly growing regard for us, and confidence in us, among those in whom such sentiments are most to be desired.

I hope the affair of Captain Asgill was settled as it ought to be, by the punishment of Lippincott. Applications have been made here to obtain letters in favor of the young gentleman. Enclosed I send you a copy of the answer I gave to that made to me.

I had before acquainted M. Tousard, that his pension would be paid in America, and there only, it being unreasonable to expect that Congress should open a Pay Office in every part of the world, where pensioners should choose to reside. I shall communicate to him that part of your letter.

You wish to know what allowance I make to my private Secretary. My grandson, William T. Franklin, came over with me, served me as a private Secretary during the time of the Commissioners; and no Secretary to the Commission arriving, though we had been made to expect one, he did business for us all, and this without any allowance for his services, though both Mr Lee and Mr Deane at times mentioned it to me as a thing proper to be done, and in justice due to him. When I became appointed sole Minister here, and the whole business, which the Commissioners had before divided with me, came into my hands, I was obliged to exact more service from him, and he was indeed, by being so long in the business, become capable of doing more. At length, in the beginning of the year 1781 when he became of age, considering his constant close attention to the duties required, and his having thereby missed the opportunity of studying the law, for which he had been intended, I determined to make him some compensation for the time past, and fix some compensation for the time to come, till the pleasure of Congress respecting him should be known. I accordingly settled an account with him, allowing him from the beginning of December 1776 to the end of 1777, the sum of 3,400 livres, and for the year 1778, the sum of 4,000 livres, for 1779, 4,800 livres, and for 1780, 6,000 livres. Since that time I have allowed him at the rate of three hundred louis per annum, being what I saw had been allowed by Congress to the Secretary of Mr William Lee, who could not have had, I imagine, a fourth part of the business to go through; since my Secretary, besides the writing and copying the papers relative to my common ministerial transactions, has had all those occasioned by my acting in the various employments of Judge of Admiralty, Consul, purchaser of goods for the public, &c. &c. besides that of accepting the Congress bills, a business that requires being always at home, bills coming by post, from different ports and countries, and often requiring immediate answers, whether good or not; and to that end, it being necessary to examine by the books, exactly kept of all preceding acceptances, in order to detect double presentations, which happen very frequently. The great number of these bills makes almost sufficient business for one person, and the confinement they occasion is such, that we cannot allow ourselves a day's excursion into the country, and the want of exercise has hurt our healths in several instances.

The Congress pay much larger salaries to some Secretaries, who, I believe, deserve them; but not more than my grandson does the comparatively small one I have allowed to him, his fidelity, exactitude, and address in transacting business, being really what one could wish in such an officer; and the genteel appearance a young gentleman in his station obliges him to make, requiring at least such an income. I do not mention the extraordinary business that has been imposed upon us in this embassy, as a foundation for demanding higher salaries than others. I never solicited for a public office, either for myself, or any relation, yet I never refused one, that I was capable of executing, when public service was in question, and I never bargained for salary, but contented myself with whatever my constituents were pleased to allow me. The Congress will therefore consider every article charged in my account, distinct from the salary originally voted, not as what I presume to insist upon, but as what I propose only for their consideration, and they will allow what they think proper.

You desire an accurate estimate of those contingent expenses. I enclose copies of two letters,[1] which passed between Mr Adams and me on the subject, and show the articles of which they consist. Their amount in different years may be found in my accounts, except the article of house rent, which has never yet been settled; M. de Chaumont, our landlord, having originally proposed to leave it till the end of the war, and then to accept for it a piece of American land from the Congress, such as they might judge equivalent. If the Congress did intend all contingent charges whatever to be included in the salary, and do not think proper to pay on the whole so much, in that case I would humbly suggest, that the saving may be most conveniently made by a diminution of the salary, leaving the contingencies to be charged; because they may necessarily be very different in different years, and at different courts.

I have been more diffuse on this subject, as your letter gave occasion for it, and it is probably the last time I shall mention it. Be pleased to present my dutiful respects to Congress, assure them of my best services, and believe me to be, with sincere esteem, &c.

B. FRANKLIN.

P. S. As you will probably lay this letter before Congress, I take the liberty of joining to it an extract of my letter to the President, of the 12th of March, 1781, and of repeating my request therein contained, relative to my grandson. I enclose, likewise, extracts of letters from Messrs Jay and Laurens, which both show the regard those gentlemen have for him, and their desire of his being noticed by the Congress.[2]

B. F.


TO JOHN JAY.

Passy, September 4th, 1782.

Dear Sir,

Mr Oswald's courier being returned, with directions to him to make the independence of America the first article in the treaty, I would wait on you if I could, to discourse on the subject; but as I cannot, I wish to see you here this evening, if not inconvenient to you.

With great esteem, I have the honor to be, dear Sir, your most obedient and most humble servant,

B. FRANKLIN.


ROBERT R. LIVINGSTON TO B. FRANKLIN.

Philadelphia, September 5th, 1782.

Sir,

Having written to you lately, I should not again trouble you so soon, were it not necessary to remind you, that your last letter is dated in March, since which there have been frequent arrivals from France; and since which too we have reason to believe, the most interesting events have taken place in Europe.

We learn from private letters and common fame, that Mr Adams was received by the United Provinces in his public character, on the 19th of April. We have yet no account of this interesting event, nor of the measures he has pursued to accomplish our other objects in Holland. Since then Mr Laurens, it is said, has been liberated, has travelled to Holland and to France, has entered upon the execution of his trust, but has left us to gather events so interesting to him and to us from private letters, and the public prints. Mr Jay tells us on the 24th of May, that he is about to set out for Paris, and that he presumes Dr Franklin has assigned the reasons for this step. Doctor Franklin has told us nothing.

As to Mr Dana, if it were not for the necessity of drawing bills in his favor, we should hardly be acquainted with his existence. It is commonly said, that republics are better informed than monarchs of the state of their foreign affairs, and that they insist upon a greater degree of vigilance and punctuality in their Ministers. We, on the contrary, seem to have adopted a new system. The ignorance, in which we are kept, of every interesting event, renders it impossible for the sovereign to instruct their servants, and of course forms them into an independent privy council for the direction of their affairs, without their advice or concurrence. I can hardly express to you what I feel on this occasion. I blush when I meet a member of Congress, who inquires into what is passing in Europe. When the General applies to me for advice on the same subject, which must regulate his movements, I am compelled to inform him, that we have no intelligence but what he has seen in the papers. The following is an extract of his last letter to me. "But how does it happen, that all our information of what is transacting in Europe should come to hand through indirect channels, or from the enemy; or does this question proceed from my unacquaintedness with facts?"

But let me dismiss a subject, which gives me so much pain, in the hope that we shall in future have no further cause of complaint.

Since the evacuation of Savannah, the enemy have by the general orders contained in the enclosed papers, announced the proposed evacuation of Charleston. We are in daily expectation of hearing, therefore, that tranquillity is restored to the Southern States. Several circumstances lead us to suppose, that they entertain thoughts of abandoning New York sometime this fall. You only can inform us, whether this step has been taken in consequence of any expectations they entertain of a general peace; or with a view to pursue the system, which the present administration appears to have adopted, when they so loudly reprobate the American war; and whether, by withdrawing their troops from hence they only mean to collect their force and direct it against our allies. This knowledge would render such an alteration in our system necessary, that it affords us new reasons for regretting our want of information on these important points.

The Marquis de Vaudreuil has unfortunately lost the Magnifique, sunk by running on a rock in the harbor of Boston, where he is now, with the remainder of his fleet, except three refitting at Portsmouth, consisting of twelve sail of the line. This has enabled Congress to show their attention to His Most Christian Majesty, and their wish to promote his interests as far as their circumstances will permit, by presenting him the America, of seventyfour guns. Enclosed are their resolves on that subject, and the answer given by the Minister of France. The ship is in such a state, that she may by diligence be refitted for sea in about two months; and from the accounts I hear of her, she will I believe prove a fine ship. The General is collecting the army. The last division of the French troops marched from here this morning. When collected, they will, I presume, repair to their old post, at the White Plains, and perhaps endeavor to accelerate the departure of the enemy.

I am sorry you did not pursue your first design, and enlarge in your letter upon the subjects, which you imagined would be discussed in the negotiations for peace. It might have changed our sentiments, and altered our views on some points. Two things are of great moment to us, one of which at least would meet with no difficulty, if France and England understand their true interests; I mean the West India trade, and the right to cut logwood and mahogany. Without a free admission of all kinds of provisions into the Islands, our agriculture will suffer extremely. This will be severely felt at first, and when it remedies itself, which it will do in time, it must be at the expense of the nations that share our commerce. It will lessen the consumption of foreign sugars, increase the supplies which the poorer people among us draw from the maple, &c. and by reducing the price of provision, and rendering the cultivation of lands less profitable, make proportionable increase of our own manufactures, and lessen our dependence on Europe. This will, I must confess, in some measure check our population, and so far I regard it as an evil. The merchants and farmers, if precluded at a peace from the advantages, which this commerce gave them while connected with England, ——.[3] Then a variety of arguments on this subject, arising as well from the general interests of France, as from her political connexion with us, might be urged to show the wisdom of adopting the same liberal sentiments on this point, which has of late distinguished her in so many others. But if she should not be able to overcome her ancient prejudices, I believe they will be found to have less influence on the British, whom you will press earnestly on this head. Besides the general interest of the kingdom, there is with them a powerful West India interest, to plead in behalf of a free importation of provisions into their Islands. If I mistake not, the present wishes of the nation, as well as the professions of administration, lead to every measure, which may wear away our present resentments, and strengthen the connexion between us and them.

The logwood trade we have some claim to, from our continued exercise of the right. Nor can England pretend to exclude us from it, without invalidating her own title, which stands upon the same ground. If Spain admits the right in England, she gains nothing by excluding us, since in proportion as she diminishes our commerce in that article, she increases that of Great Britain. Other manufacturing nations are interested in exciting a competition between us at their markets.

When you write to me, be pleased to be very particular in your relation of every step, which leads to a negotiation. Everything of this kind must be interesting.

I have the honor to be, Sir,

ROBERT R. LIVINGSTON.


RICHARD OSWALD TO B. FRANKLIN.

Paris, September 5th, 1782.

Sir,

In consequence of the notice I have just now had from Mr Jay of your desire of an extract from my last letter from the Secretary of State, regarding the proposed treaty on the subject of American affairs, and my authority in relation thereto, I take the liberty to send the same enclosed, which, together with the powers contained in the commission, which I had the honor of laying before you and Mr Jay, I am hopeful will satisfy you of the willingness and sincere desire of his Majesty to give you entire content on that important subject.

This extract I would have sent before now, if I had thought you wished to have it before I had the honor of waiting on you myself; which was only delayed until I should be informed by Mr Jay, that you were well enough to see me upon business.

I heartily wish you a recovery of your health, and am, with sincere esteem and regard, Sir, your most obedient humble servant,

RICHARD OSWALD.


TO RICHARD OSWALD.

Passy, September 8th, 1782.

Sir,

I have received the honor of yours, dated the 5th instant, enclosing an extract of a letter to your Excellency, from the right honorable Thomas Townshend, one of his Majesty's principal Secretaries of State, wherein your conduct in communicating to us the fourth article of your instructions appears to have been approved by his Majesty. I suppose, therefore, that there is no impropriety in my requesting a copy of that instruction; and if you see none, I wish to receive it from you, hoping it may be of use in removing some of the difficulties that obstruct our proceeding.[4]

With great and sincere esteem, I am, Sir, your Excellency's most obedient and most humble servant,

B. FRANKLIN.


TO EARL GRANTHAM.

Passy, September 11th, 1782.

My Lord,

A long and severe indisposition has delayed my acknowledging the receipt of the letter your Lordship did me the honor of writing to me by Mr Fitzherbert.

You do me justice in believing, that I agree with you in earnestly wishing the establishment of an honorable and lasting peace; and I am happy to be assured by your Lordship, that it is the system of the Ministers with whom you are co-operating. I know it to be the sincere desire of the United States, and with such dispositions on both sides there is reason to hope, that the good work in its progress will meet with little difficulty. A small one has occurred in the commencement, with which Mr Oswald will acquaint you. I flatter myself that means will be found on your part for removing it; and my best endeavors in removing the subsequent ones (if any should arise) may be relied on.

I had the honor of being known to your Lordship's father. On several occasions he manifested a regard for me, and a confidence in me. I shall be happy if my conduct in the present important business may procure me the same rank in the esteem of his worthy successor.

I am, with sincere respect, my Lord, your Lordship's most obedient and most humble servant,

B. FRANKLIN.


ROBERT R. LIVINGSTON TO B. FRANKLIN.

Philadelphia, September 12th, 1782.

Sir,

I have nothing to add to mine of the 5th instant, but to congratulate you on the safe arrival of two vessels from Holland, having on board the goods left by Commodore Gillon, and to present you in the name of Mr Paine, with three copies of a late work of his addressed to the Abbé Raynal, in which he takes notice of some of the many errors with which his work abounds. The Abbé has a fine imagination, and he indulges it. The enclosed resolution contains an important fact, which I am using means to ascertain; but from the ill success I have hitherto met with in every similar attempt, I am fearful that it will be very long before I can effect it.

I have the honor to be, Sir, with great respect and esteem, your most obedient humble servant,

ROBERT R. LIVINGSTON.


ROBERT R. LIVINGSTON TO B. FRANKLIN.

Philadelphia, September 12th, 1782.

Sir,

Since writing the above, I have received the enclosed resolutions of Congress. I have already anticipated all that can be said upon the subject of the last; the melancholy tale of our necessities is sufficiently known to you, it has been too often repeated to need recitation.

Mr Morris, who writes from an empty Treasury amidst perpetual duns, will speak more feelingly. In short, money must be obtained for us at any rate, whether we have peace or war. France having already done much for us, and it not being probable that we shall extend our demands beyond the present, she may think it wise not to let us open accounts with a new banker, since the debtor is always more or less under obligations to the creditor.

I have the honor to be, Sir, with respect and esteem,

ROBERT R. LIVINGSTON.


TO DAVID HARTLEY.

Passy, September 17th, 1782.

My dear Friend,

Since those acknowledged in my last, I have received your several favors of August the 16th, 20th, and 26th. I have been a long time afflicted with the gravel and gout, which have much indisposed me for writing. I am even now in pain, but will no longer delay some answer.

I did not perfectly comprehend the nature of your appointment respecting the refugees, and I supposed you would in a subsequent letter explain it. But, as I now find you have declined the service, such explanation is become unnecessary.

I did receive the paper you inquire about, entitled Preliminaries, and dated May, 1782, but it was from you, and I know nothing of their having been communicated to this Court. The third proposition, "that in case the negotiation between Great Britain and the allies of America should not succeed, but the war continue between them, America should act and be treated as a neutral nation," appeared at first sight inadmissible, being contrary to our treaty. The truce too seems not to have been desired by any of the parties.

With unalterable esteem and affection, I am, my dear Friend, ever yours, &c.

B. FRANKLIN.


ROBERT R. LIVINGSTON TO B. FRANKLIN.

Philadelphia, September 18th, 1782.

Sir,

Just after closing my despatches, I was favored with yours of the 25th of April, and the 25th and 29th of June. The ships that brought them were so unfortunate as to be chased into the Delaware by a superior force. The Eagle was driven ashore and sunk. The papers and money were however happily saved, and part of the crew. But Captain la Fouche, not having been since heard of, is supposed to be taken. The other frigate has arrived safe, with all the passengers of both ships.

As I am just about to leave town for a short time, I will not touch upon the important subject mentioned in your letters, which will on account of my absence be committed to a special committee.

I would only observe to you, that the resolution in my last shows the sense of Congress on the subject of money matters.

You will see by the annexed resolutions, that Congress have refused to accept Mr Laurens's resignation, and that they have made some alteration in your powers.

I send the papers, which contain the little news we have, and am, Sir,

ROBERT R. LIVINGSTON.


MR SECRETARY TOWNSHEND TO RICHARD OSWALD.

Whitehall, September 20th, 1782.

Sir,

I received, on Saturday last, your packets of the 10th and 11th of this month.

A meeting of the King's confidential servants was held as soon as possible, to consider the contents of them, and it was at once agreed to make the alteration in the commission proposed by Dr Franklin and Mr Jay. I trust that the readiness with which this proposal has been accepted, will be considered as an ample testimony of the openness and sincerity with which the government of this country is disposed to treat with the Americans.

The commission is passing with as much despatch as the forms of office will allow; but I thought it material that no delay should happen, in giving you notice of the determination of his Majesty's Council upon this subject. You will receive the commission very soon after this reaches you.

I am, with great regard, &c.

T. TOWNSHEND.


RICHARD OSWALD TO B. FRANKLIN.

Paris, September 24th, 1782.

Sir,

Having received, by a courier just now arrived, a letter from Mr Secretary Townshend, in answer to mine, which went by the messenger, despatched from hence on the 12th, I take this opportunity of Mr Whiteford to send you a copy of it. I hope he will bring good accounts of your health, which I sincerely wish, and am your Excellency's, &c.

RICHARD OSWALD.


COUNT DE VERGENNES TO B. FRANKLIN.

Translation.

Versailles, September 25th, 1782.

Sir,

I have the honor to send you my despatches for the Chevalier de la Luzerne. The packet is voluminous, but it contains many duplicates.

I should be glad if it were in my power to inform him, that our treaty is in as good progress as yours, but this is far from being the case. I cannot even foresee what will be the issue, for difficulties multiply. It will be well for you to forewarn the Congress to be prepared for whatever event may arise. I do not despair; I the rather hope; but as yet all is uncertainty.

I have the honor to be, Sir,

DE VERGENNES.


TO ROBERT R. LIVINGSTON.

Passy, September 26th, 1782.

Sir,

I have just received your No. 15, dated the 9th of August, which mentions your not having heard from me since March. I have, however, written sundry letters, viz. of April the 8th, and June the 12th, June the 25th and 29th, August the 12th, and September the 3d, and sent copies of the same, which I hope cannot all have miscarried.

The negotiations for peace have hitherto amounted to little more than mutual professions of sincere desires, &c., being obstructed by the want of due form in the English commissions appointing their plenipotentiaries. The objections made to those for treating with France, Spain and Holland were first removed, and by the enclosed[5] it seems that our objections to that for treating with us will now be removed also, so that we expect to begin in a few days our negotiations. But there are so many interests to be considered and settled, in a peace between five different nations, that it will be well not to flatter ourselves with a very speedy conclusion.

I mentioned, in a former letter, my having communicated to Count de Vergennes the state of American commerce, which you sent me, and my having urged its consideration, &c. Enclosed is a copy of a letter received from that Minister on the subject.

The copy of General Carleton's letter, and the bills of exchange, which you mentioned as enclosed, do not appear. I hope soon to have a better opportunity of writing, when I shall be fuller.

With great esteem, &c.

B. FRANKLIN.


COUNT DE VERGENNES TO B. FRANKLIN.

Translation.

Versailles, October 3d, 1782.

Sir,

I have the honor to return you the commission appointing Thomas Barclay consul of the United States, to reside in France, and I endorse the exequatur, which is requisite for the exercise of his functions. I must inform you, that the latter of these will require the Admiral's signature previously to its being registered, either by the Secretary of the Admiralty at L'Orient, where Mr Barclay intends to fix his residence, or by those of other ports of the kingdom, where commercial considerations may require his presence.

I have the honor to be, &c.

DE VERGENNES.


DAVID HARTLEY TO B. FRANKLIN.

Bath, October 4th, 1782.

My Dear Friend,

I only write one line to you, to let you know that I am not forgetful of you, or of our common concerns. I have not heard anything from the Ministry yet; I believe it is a kind of vacation with them, before the meeting of Parliament. I have told you of a proposition, which I have had some thoughts to make as a kind of copartnership in commerce. I send you a purposed temporary convention, which I have drawn up. You are to consider it only as one I recommend. The words underlined are grafted upon the proposition of my Memorial, dated May 19th, 1778. You will see the principle, which I have in my thoughts to extend for the purpose of restoring our ancient copartnership generally.

I cannot tell you what event things may take, but my thoughts are always employed in endeavoring to arrange that system upon which the China Vase, lately shattered, may be cemented together, upon principles of compact and connexion, instead of dependence.

I have met with a sentiment in this country which gives some alarm, viz. lest the unity of government in America should be uncertain, and the States reject the authority of Congress. Some passages in General Washington's letter have given weight to these doubts. I do not hear of any tendency to this opinion; that the American States will break to pieces, and then we may still conquer them. I believe all that folly is extinguished. But many serious and well disposed persons are alarmed, lest this should be the ill-fated moment for relaxing the powers of the union, and annihilating the cement of confederation, (vide Washington's letter,) and that Great Britain should thereby lose her best and wisest hope of being reconnected with the American States unitedly. I should for one think it the greatest misfortune. Pray give me some opinion upon this.

You see there is likewise another turn, which may be given to this sentiment by intemperate and disappointed people, who may indulge a passionate revenge for their own disappointments, by endeavoring to excite general distrust, discord, and disunion. I wish to be prepared and guarded at all points.

I beg my best compliments to your colleagues; be so good as to show this letter to them. I beg particularly my condolence (and I hope congratulation) to Mr Adams; I hear that he has been very dangerously ill, but that he is again recovered. I hope the latter part is true, and that we shall all survive to set our hands to some future compacts of common interest, and common affection, between our two countries.

Your ever affectionate,

D. HARTLEY.


TO ROBERT R. LIVINGSTON.

Passy, October 14th, 1782.

Sir,

I have but just received information of this opportunity, and have only time allowed to write a few lines.

In my last of the 26th past, I mentioned that the negotiation for peace had been obstructed, by the want of due form in the English commissions appointing their plenipotentiaries. In that for treating with us, the mentioning our States by their public name had been avoided, which we objected to; another is come, of which I send a copy enclosed. We have now made several preliminary propositions, which the English Minister, Mr Oswald, has approved, and sent to his Court. He thinks they will be approved there, but I have some doubts. In a few days, however, the answer expected will determine. By the first of these articles, the King of Great Britain renounces for himself and successors, all claim and pretension to dominion or territory within the Thirteen United States; and the boundaries are described as in our instructions, except that the line between Nova Scotia and New England is to be settled by Commissioners after the peace. By another article, the fishery in the American seas is to be freely exercised by the Americans, wherever they might formerly exercise it while united with Great Britain. By another, the citizens and subjects of each nation are to enjoy the same protection and privileges, in each others' ports and countries, respecting commerce, duties, &c. that are enjoyed by native subjects. The articles are drawn up very fully by Mr Jay, who I suppose sends you a copy; if not, it will go by the next opportunity. If these articles are agreed to, I apprehend little difficulty in the rest. Something has been mentioned about the refugees and English debts, but not insisted on, as we declared at once, that whatever confiscations had been made in America, being in virtue of the laws of particular States, the Congress had no authority to repeal those laws, and therefore could give us none to stipulate for such repeal.

I have been honored with the receipt of your letters, Nos 14 and 15. I have also received two letters from Mr Lewis R. Morris, both dated the 6th of July, and one dated the 10th of August, enclosing bills for

68,290 livres,
71,380
9,756
———
In all 149,426 livres,

being intended for the payment of Ministers' salaries for the two first quarters of this year. But as these bills came so late, that all those salaries were already paid, I shall make no use of the bills, but lay them by till further orders; and the salaries of different Ministers not having all the same times of falling due, as they had different commencements, I purpose to get all their accounts settled and reduced to the same period, and send you the state of them, that you may be clear in future orders. I see in one of the estimates sent me, that a quarter's salary of a Minister is reckoned at 14,513 livres, in the other it is reckoned 16,667 livres, and the bill for 9,756[6] livres is mentioned as intended to pay a balance due on the remittance of the 68,290 livres. Being unacquainted with the state of your exchange, I do not well comprehend this, and therefore leave the whole for the present, as I have said above. Permit me only to hint for your consideration, whether it may not be well hereafter to omit mention of sterling, in our appointments, since we have severed from the country to which that denomination of money is peculiar; and also to order the payment of your Ministers in such a manner, that they may know exactly what they are to receive, and not be subject to the fluctuations of exchange. If it is that, which occasions the difference between 14,583 for the first quarter, and the 16,667 for the second, it is considerable. I think we have no right to any advantage by the exchange, nor should we be liable to any loss from it. Hitherto we have taken 15,000 for a quarter, (subject however to the allowance or disallowance of Congress) which is lower than the medium between those two extremes.

The different accounts given of Lord Shelburne's character, with respect to sincerity, induced the Ministry here to send over M. de Rayneval, Secretary to the Council, to converse with him, and endeavor to form by that means a more perfect judgment of what was to be expected from the negotiations. He was five or six days in England, saw all the Ministers, and returned quite satisfied, that they are sincerely desirous of peace, so that the negotiations now go on with some prospect of success. But the Court and people of England are very changeable. A little turn of fortune in their favor sometimes turns their heads; and I shall not think a speedy peace to be depended on, till I see the treaties signed. I am obliged to finish.

With great esteem, &c.

B. FRANKLIN.


TO JOHN ADAMS.

Passy, October 15th, 1782.

Sir,

A long and painful illness has prevented my corresponding with your Excellency regularly.

Mr Jay has, I believe, acquainted you with the obstructions our peace negotiations have met with, and that they are at length removed. By the next courier expected from London, we may be able perhaps to form some judgment of the probability of success, so far as relates to our part of the peace. How likely the other powers are to settle their pretensions, I cannot yet learn. In the mean time, America is gradually growing more easy, by the enemy's evacuation of their posts; as you will see by some intelligence I enclose.

With great respect, I have the honor to be, &c.

B. FRANKLIN.


FROM T. TOWNSHEND TO B. FRANKLIN.

Whitehall, October 23d, 1782.

Sir,

As Mr Strachey is going from hence to Paris, with some particulars for Mr Oswald, which were not easily to be explained in writing, I take the liberty of introducing him to your acquaintance, though I am not sure that he is not a little known to you. The confidential situation in which he stands with me, makes me particularly desirous of presenting him to you.

I believe, Sir, I am enough known to you, for you to believe me, when I say, that there has not been from the beginning a single person more averse to the unhappy war, or who wishes more earnestly than I do, for a return of peace and mutual amity between Great Britain and America.

I am, with great regard, Sir, your most obedient humble servant,

T. TOWNSHEND.


TO THOMAS TOWNSHEND.

Passy, November 4th, 1782.

Sir,

I received the letter you did me the honor of writing to me by Mr Strachey, and was much pleased with the opportunity it gave me of renewing and increasing my acquaintance with a gentleman of so amiable and deserving a character.

I am sensible you have ever been averse to the measures that brought on this unhappy war; I have, therefore, no doubt of the sincerity of your wishes for a return of peace. Mine are equally earnest. Nothing, therefore, except the beginning of the war, has given me more concern than to learn at the conclusion of our conferences, that it is not likely to be soon ended. Be assured, no endeavors on my part would be wanting to remove any difficulties that may have arisen, or even if a peace were made, to procure afterwards any changes in the treaty that might tend to render it more perfect, and the peace more durable. But we, who are here at so great a distance from our constituents, have not the possibility of obtaining in a few days fresh instructions, as is the case with your negotiators, and are therefore obliged to insist on what is conformable to those we have, and at the same time appears to us just and reasonable.

With great esteem and respect, I have the honor to be, Sir, &c.

B. FRANKLIN.


TO ROBERT R. LIVINGSTON.

Passy, November 7th, 1782.

Sir,

The Baron de Kermelin, a Swedish gentleman of distinction, recommended strongly to me by his Excellency, the Ambassador of that nation to this Court, as a person highly esteemed in his own, purposes a journey through North America, to view its natural productions, acquaint himself with its commerce, and acquire such information as may be useful to his country, in the communication and connexion of interests that seem to be growing, and probably may soon become considerable between the two nations. I therefore beg leave to introduce him to you, and request that you would present him to the President of Congress, and to such other persons as you shall think may be useful to him in his views, and I recommend him earnestly to those civilities, which you have a pleasure in showing to strangers of merit.

I have the honor to be, &c.

B. FRANKLIN.


ROBERT R. LIVINGSTON TO B. FRANKLIN.

Philadelphia, November 9th, 1782.

Dear Sir,

Mr Stewart, informing me that he shall set out tomorrow for Paris, will be the bearer of this, and duplicates of my last letters. The want of time will prevent my sending Mr Jay duplicates of the resolutions formerly enclosed to him, which will be the more unnecessary as you will communicate those you receive with this, if my former letters containing them, have not reached him.

We are much flattered by the proposals of Sweden, and feel all the force of its Minister's observations; every new acknowledgment lays the foundation of others, and familiarizes Great Britain with the idea of acknowledging us as sovereign and independent. I feel some pleasure, too, in thinking that you are to be the instrument of procuring us new connexions, and beg leave to remind you of another which calls upon your attention, though it seems to have been forgotten in the hurry of business. I mean that with the States of Barbary. The good dispositions of the Court of France towards us, and the enlarged policy by which their measures are actuated, together with the coolness that at present subsists between the Emperor of Morocco and Great Britain, (if we are well informed) seem to point out this as the favorable moment for making ourselves known to him. As Mr Jay is now with you, I wish you would consult upon the means of bringing this about, so that we may not be shut out of the Mediterranean in future.

I know you will start a very obvious objection. But as this can only be removed by your influence where you now are, we rely upon you for the means as well as for the manner of treating. I have not thought it necessary to say anything to Congress on this subject, nor shall I, till you give me hopes that something may be done in it.

The only political object of a general nature, that has been touched upon in Congress since my last, is the exchange of prisoners, which seems at present to be as far as ever from being effected. The propositions on the side of the enemy were to exchange seamen for soldiers, they having no soldiers in their hands; that the soldiers so exchanged should not serve for one year against the United States; that the sailors might go into immediate service; that the remainder of the soldiers in our hands should be given up at a stipulated price.

Congress rejected this proposal as unequal; as letting loose a force, which might be employed against our allies in the West Indies; as making no provision for the payment of the large balance due to us for the maintenance of prisoners. They further required, that General Carleton should explicitly declare, that the powers he gives to his Commissioners for negotiating an exchange are derived from the King of Great Britain, so that any engagement for the payment of the debt they have incurred may be considered as binding upon the nation. With respect to Mr Laurens, they have come to no decided opinion. The Committee to whom it was referred, reporting that,

"With respect to the information contained in the extract of Sir Guy Carleton's and Admiral Digby's letter of the 2d of August, 'that after Mr Laurens was discharged, he declared that he considered Lord Cornwallis as freed from his parole,' your Committee conceive it sufficient to observe, that no intimation having been received of such a fact, except, from the said extract, and Congress having given no directions to that purpose, the consideration thereof would in their opinion be premature, and ought therefore to be deferred." Since which, though letters have been received from Mr Laurens, they have come to no resolution, unless their direction to him to proceed in the business of his mission may be considered as such.

General Carleton has sent out the trial of Lippincott, which admits the murder of Huddy, but justifies Lippincott under an irregular order of the Board of Refugees. So paltry a palliation of so black a crime would not have been admitted, and Captain Asgill would certainly have paid the forfeit for the injustice of his countrymen, had not the interposition of their Majesties prevented. The letter from the Count de Vergennes is made the groundwork of the resolution passed on that subject. I shall transmit you the resolve.

I suppose I need not tell you, that the enemy contrived to get off the Eagle and to carry her, to New York. You will find, in the enclosed papers, a very polite letter from Captain Elphingston; it is easier to be so in word than in deed among the British. Digby has refused to permit him to comply with his engagement, at least so far as his share of the prize is concerned, and insists upon dividing the baggage of the officers, and sharing the eighth pair of breeches, &c.

On the 4th instant, Mr Boudinot was elected President in the room of Mr Hanson, whose term of service had expired. Mr Lewis Morris will enclose bills purchased here at six shillings and three pence, currency, for five livres, to the amount of your last quarter's salary, ending the first of October.

I have the honor to be, &c.

ROBERT R. LIVINGSTON.


ROBERT R. LIVINGSTON TO B. FRANKLIN.

Philadelphia, November 21st, 1782.

Sir,

Congress a few days since, passed the enclosed resolution, No. 1, by which they have added Mr Jefferson to the commission for concluding a peace. The established character of this gentleman gives me reason to hope, that his appointment will be very acceptable to you, and the other gentlemen in the commission. I have not yet learned whether he will take the task upon him, but I have reason to believe he will, the death of his wife having lessened, in the opinion of his friends, the reluctance which he has hitherto manifested to going abroad. I think it would be proper to make a formal annunciation of this resolution to the Court of France. You will naturally give such a representation of Mr Jefferson's character, as will secure to him there that esteem and confidence which he justly merits. The resolution, No. 2, needs no comment; or if it does, Mr Morris will prove the able commentator. I resign the task to him.

For what end are the show of negotiations kept up by England, when peace upon the only terms she can possibly expect to obtain it is far from her heart? Her Ministers, like some Ministers of the Gospel, who are unwilling to quit the pulpit when they have tired out their hearers, expect to keep the people together by calling out at every period, "now to conclude," while they continue the same dull tale for want of skill to wind it up.

By accounts from Jamaica, we learn that the British have recovered most of their settlements on the Bay. Some attention will, I hope, be paid in the treaty of peace to secure to us the share we formerly had in the logwood trade; it was a valuable remittance to us, and the low price at which we were enabled to sell renders it important to other nations, that we should not be excluded from furnishing it as usual. You will find by the enclosed paper, that Mr Burgess, an English merchant, was not permitted to settle at Boston and obtain the rights of citizenship, upon principles which must be alarming to England. It shows at the same time the respect that is paid to the resolutions of Congress, notwithstanding all that has been said and written to prove the contrary.

I am, Sir, &c.

ROBERT R. LIVINGSTON.

P. S. I forgot to mention, that I am solicited by Mr Barlow to transmit to you proposals for printing a work of his, which you will find described in the enclosed proposals, as they are accompanied with a specimen of his poetry, which is as much as I have seen of it. You will judge yourself how far it deserves the patronage he wishes you to give it.


TO RICHARD OSWALD.

Passy, November 26th, 1782.

Sir,

You may well remember, that in the beginning of our conferences, before the other Commissioners arrived, on your mentioning to me a retribution for the royalists, whose estates had been confiscated, I acquainted you that nothing of that kind could be stipulated by us, the confiscation being made by virtue of laws of particular States, which the Congress had no power to contravene or dispense with, and therefore could give us no such authority in our commission. And I gave it as my opinion and advice, honestly and cordially, that if a reconciliation was intended, no mention should be made in our negotiations of those people; for they having done infinite mischief to our properties, by wantonly burning and destroying farm-houses, villages, and towns, if compensation for their losses were insisted on, we should certainly exhibit again such an account of all the ravages they had committed, which would necessarily recall to view scenes of barbarity that must inflame, instead of conciliating, and tend to perpetuate an enmity that we all profess a desire of extinguishing. Understanding, however, from you, that this was a point your Ministry had at heart, I wrote concerning it to Congress, and I have lately received the following resolution, viz.

"By the United States, in Congress assembled."

September 10th, 1782.

"Resolved, That the Secretary for Foreign Affairs be, and he is hereby directed to obtain, as speedily as possible, authentic returns of the slaves and other property, which have been carried off or destroyed in the course of the war by the enemy, and to transmit the same to the Ministers Plenipotentiary for negotiating peace.

"Resolved, That, in the meantime, the Secretary for Foreign Affairs inform the said Ministers, that many thousands of slaves, and other property, to a very great amount, have been carried off, or destroyed by the enemy; and that in the opinion of Congress, the great loss of property, which the citizens of the United States have sustained by the enemy, will be considered by the several States as an insuperable bar to their making restitution or indemnification to the former owner of property, which has been, or may be forfeited to, or confiscated by any of the States."

In consequence of these resolutions and circular letters of the Secretary, the Assembly of Pennsylvania, then sitting, passed the following act, viz.

"State of Pennsylvania, in General Assembly."

Wednesday, September 18th, 1782.

"The bill, entitled 'An Act for procuring an estimate of the damages sustained by the inhabitants of Pennsylvania, from the troops and adherents of the King of Great Britain during the present war,' was read a second time.

"Ordered to be transcribed, and printed for public consideration.

Extract from the minutes.

Peter Z. Lloyd.
Clerk of the General Assembly."

"Whereas great damages, of the most wanton nature, have been committed by the armies of the King of Great Britain, or their adherents within the territory of the United States of North America, unwarranted by the practice of civilized nations, and only to be accounted for from the vindictive spirit of the said King and his officers; and whereas an accurate account and estimate of such damages, more especially the waste and destruction of property, may be very useful to the people of the United States of America, in forming a future treaty of peace, and, in the meantime, may serve to exhibit in a true light to the nations of Europe the conduct of the said King, his Ministers, officers, and adherents; to the end, therefore, that proper measures be taken to ascertain the damages aforesaid, which have been done to the citizens and inhabitants of Pennsylvania, in the course of the present war within this State; Be it enacted by the House of Representatives of the freemen of the commonwealth of Pennsylvania, in General Assembly met, and by the authority of the same, that in every county of this State, which has been invaded by the armies, soldiers, or adherents of the King of Great Britain, the Commissioners of every such county shall immediately meet together, each within their county, and issue directions to the assessors of the respective townships, districts, and places within such county, to call upon the inhabitants of every township and place, to furnish accounts and estimates of the damages, waste, spoil, and destruction, which have been done and committed as aforesaid, upon the property, real or personal, within the same township or place, since the first day of which was in the year of our Lord 177 , and the same accounts and estimates to be transmitted to the Commissioners without delay. And if any person or persons shall refuse or neglect to make out such accounts and estimates, the said assessors of the township or place shall, from their own knowledge, and by any other reasonable and lawful method, take and render such an account and estimate of all damage done or committed, as aforesaid; Provided always, that all such accounts and estimates to be made out and transmitted as aforesaid, shall contain a narrative of the time and circumstances; and if in the power of the person aggrieved, the names of the General, or other officers or adherents of the enemy by whom the damage in any case was done, or under whose orders the army, detachment, party, or persons, committing the same, acted at that time, and also the name and condition of the person or persons, whose property was so damaged or destroyed, and that all such accounts and estimates be made in current money, upon oath or affirmation of the sufferer, or of others having knowledge concerning the same; and that in every case it be set forth, whether the party injured hath received any satisfaction for his loss, and by whom the same was given.

"And be it further enacted by the authority aforesaid, that the said Commissioners, having obtained the said accounts and estimates from the assessor of the several townships and places, shall proceed to inspect and register the same in a book, to be provided for that purpose, distinguishing the districts and townships, and entering those of each place together; and if any account and estimate be imperfect, or not sufficiently verified and established, the said Commissioners shall have power, and they, or any two of them, are hereby authorised to summon and compel any person, whose evidence they shall think necessary, to appear before them at a day and place appointed, to be summoned upon oath or affirmation, concerning any damage or injury as aforesaid; and the said Commissioners shall, upon the call and demand of the President, or Vice President of the Supreme Executive Council, deliver, or send to the Secretary of the said council, all or any of the original accounts and estimates aforesaid, and shall also deliver, or send to the said Secretary, copies of the book aforesaid, or any part or parts thereof, upon reasonable notice. And be it further enacted by the authority aforesaid, that all losses of negro or mulatto slaves and servants, who have been deluded and carried away by the enemies of the United States, and who have not been recovered or recompensed, shall be comprehended within the accounts and estimates aforesaid; and that the Commissioners and assessors of any county, which had not been invaded as aforesaid, shall nevertheless inquire after, and procure accounts and estimates of any damages suffered by the loss of such servants and slaves, as is herein before directed as to other property.

"And be it further enacted by the authority aforesaid, that the charges and expenses of executing this act, as to the pay of the said Commissioners and assessors, shall be as in other cases; and that witnesses shall be rewarded for their loss of time and trouble, as witnesses summoned to appear in the courts of quarter sessions of the peace; and the said charges and expenses shall be defrayed by the commonwealth; but paid, in the first instance, out of the hands of the Treasurer of the County, for county rates, and levies upon orders drawn by the Commissioners of the proper county."

We have not yet had time to hear what has been done by the other assemblies; but I have no doubt that similar acts will be made use of by all of them, and that the mass of evidence produced by the execution of those acts, not only of the enormities committed by those people, under the direction of the British Generals, but of those committed by the British troops themselves, will form a record that must render the British name odious in America to the latest generations. In that authentic record will be found the burning of the fine towns of Charlestown, near Boston; of Falmouth, just before winter, when the sick, the aged, the women and children, were driven to seek shelter where they could hardly find it; of Norfolk, in the midst of winter; of New London, of Fairfield, of Esopus, &c. besides near a hundred and fifty miles of well settled country laid waste; every house and barn burnt, and many hundreds of farmers, with their wives and children, butchered and scalped.

The present British Ministers, when they reflect a little, will certainly be too equitable to suppose, that their nation has a right to make an unjust war, (which they have always allowed this against us to be,) and do all sorts of unnecessary mischief, unjustifiable by the practice of any individual people, which those they make war with are to suffer without claiming any satisfaction; but that if Britons, or their adherents, are in return deprived of any property, it is to be restored to them, or they are to be indemnified. The British troops can never excuse their barbarities. They were unprovoked. The loyalists may say in excuse of theirs, that they were exasperated by the loss of their estates, and it was revenge. They have then had their revenge. Is it right they should have both?

Some of those people may have merit in their regard for Britain, and who espoused her cause from affection; these it may become you to reward. But there are many of them who were waverers, and were only determined to engage in it by some occasional circumstance or appearances; these have not much of either merit or demerit; and there are others, who have abundance of demerit respecting your country, having by their falsehoods and misrepresentations brought on and encouraged the continuance of the war; these, instead of being recompensed, should be punished.

It is usual among Christian people at war to profess always a desire of peace; but if the Ministers of one of the parties choose to insist particularly on a certain article, which they have known the others are not and cannot be empowered to agree to, what credit can they expect should be given to such professions?

Your Ministers require that we should receive again into our bosom those who have been our bitterest enemies, and restore their properties who have destroyed ours, and this, while the wounds they have given us are still bleeding! It is many years since your nation expelled the Stuarts and their adherents, and confiscated their estates. Much of your resentment against them may by this time be abated; yet, if we should propose it, and insist on it as an article of our treaty with you, that that family should be recalled and the forfeited estates of its friends restored, would you think us serious in our progressions of earnestly desiring peace?

I must repeat my opinion, that it is best for you to drop all mention of the refugees. We have proposed, indeed, nothing but what we think best for you as well as ourselves. But if you will have them mentioned, let it be in an article, in which you may provide, that they shall exhibit accounts of their losses to the Commissioners, hereafter to be appointed, who should examine the same, together with the accounts now preparing in America of the damages done by them, and state the account, and that if a balance appears in their favor, it shall be paid by us to you, and by you divided among them as you shall think proper. And if the balance is found due to us, it shall be paid by you.

Give me leave, however, to advise you to prevent the necessity of so dreadful a discussion by dropping the article, that we may write to America and stop the inquiry.

I have the honor to be, &c.

B. FRANKLIN.


ROBERT R. LIVINGSTON TO B. FRANKLIN.

Philadelphia, November 27th, 1782.

Sir,

An opportunity offering from this port to write directly to you, I do not choose to hazard anything by the post, which carries this to Boston, particularly as I did not hear till just now, that a frigate was to sail from thence, and it is uncertain whether this will arrive in time to go by her. This then only accompanies the newspapers, which contain all the public information now in circulation.

The Memorials of Messrs la Marque and Fabru are transmitted to South Carolina, as it is a matter in which the United States are not concerned. It is to be hoped, that the State will do justice to the claimants, if, as asserted, Gillon acted under authority from them. He has just left this with his ship, not in the most honorable manner, having, as I am informed, been arrested by order of the proprietor of the ship for his proportion of the prize money. The sheriff stands in the gap.

The Swiss officer mentioned in yours, I have sent to Edenton to get information about. You shall have the result of inquiries in my next.

As your grandson will probably choose to continue in the line he is in, I cannot but think he might find important advantages from opening a correspondence with this office. His diligence and accuracy in collecting and transmitting intelligence would procure him friends here. My attachment to you will render me desirous to place them in the best light.

I am, Sir, &c.

ROBERT R. LIVINGSTON.


TO COUNT DE VERGENNES.

Passy, November 29th, 1782.

Sir,

I have the honor to acquaint your Excellency, that the Commissioners of the United States have agreed with Mr Oswald, on the preliminary articles of the peace between those States and Great Britain. Tomorrow I hope we shall be able to communicate to your Excellency a copy of them.[7]

With great respect, I have the honor to be, Sir, your Excellency's most obedient and most humble servant,