SECT. LXIX.—ON THE MOLE.
The mole, too, is a scirrhous tumour, forming sometimes at the mouth and sometimes in the body of the womb, conveying to the touch the sensation of stone, and being attended with retraction of the parts above, and emaciation, paleness, loss of appetite, retention of the menses, and swelling of the breasts, so as in certain cases to raise suspicions at first of a conception; but in process of time the true nature of the complaint is developed. Sometimes also it raises suspicions of dropsy, from which it is to be distinguished by the hardness of the swelling, and from there being no sound of water when tapped by the fingers, as is the case in dropsy. In certain cases, however, the disease actually terminates in dropsy, which for the most part proves incurable. In some cases, it also brings on a discharge of blood. In general, therefore, it is proper that the patients should lie in a small, dark, and moderately cool house, upon a firm couch, with their feet raised, and in a state of quietude; for motion provokes discharges of every kind. And the swelling and hardness are to be cured by the remedies which we have mentioned for scirrhus and scleroma of the uterus; dropsical effusions by those recommended for dropsy; and hemorrhages by those for the flux. Some call by the name of mole an unorganized mass of flesh which forms on the coats of the womb, and is delivered like the fœtus. This species is to be managed by a relaxing treatment, so as to be speedily discharged.
Commentary. By the first species of mole, fibrous tumour of the ovaria and perhaps also scirrhus of the neck of the womb are meant to be described. The other species is now well understood, and is described by many ancient authors. See an account of it at the end of Aristotle’s ‘History of Animals;’ also Pliny (H. N. vii, 15, and x, 64); Hippocrates (de Steril. xx); Plutarch (t. i, 252, ed. Xylander); Nonnus (212); Rhases (ad Mansor. ix, 88; Cont. xxii); Moschion (de Morb. Mul. 125); Actuarius (Meth. Med. i, 56.) Galen and Avicenna agree in representing the true mole as a corruption of the male semen, and consequently they believed that it never occurs in virgins. Hanneman and other modern authorities maintain the contrary. See ‘Dissertations on the Mole’ by Van Swieten (Comment. 1326), by Ambrose Paré (de Hom. Genit. xxxiii), by Martinus Akakia (ap. Gynæc. 773), by Lodovicus Mercatus (ap. Gynæc. 1013), by Leonardus Jacchinus (Comment. in Rhasis, ix, 71), and by Ruysch (Anat. Chirurg. Cent.)
Aëtius gives an account of the former species, but it is little different from our author’s. He recommends, in the first place, emollient applications of all kinds, namely, baths, pessaries, and fumigations, and afterwards dropaces, sinapisms, and the like. The same plan of treatment is pursued by Avicenna. Haly Abbas and Alsaharavius describe the two species of mole in exactly the same terms as our author. Rhases also describes the two species of mole, namely, the one which is hard and round, and the other or soft species to which the name is now generally restricted.
Hippocrates relates a curious case of a calculus which was discharged from the uterus of a woman sixty years old, who had long felt pain in that region dum venere uteretur. Aëtius also makes mention of the uterine calculus. Lodovicus Mercatus gives a curious account of this subject (Gynæc. 969.) Michaelis Angelus Morus relates a singular case of a woman who died of uterine calculi. (Mangeti Bibl. Chirurg. xviii.)