Subsequent Epidemics of Typhus and Relapsing Fevers.
By midsummer, 1848, there was a most marked improvement in the public health, corresponding with the great fall in the prices of food, under the influence of free trade, and with a good harvest and the commencement of an era of steady employment for workers. The improvement is strikingly shown in the following comparison of the deaths from all causes in Lancashire and Cheshire in the third quarter of each of the years 1846, 1847 and 1848:
| 1846 | 1847 | 1848 | ||||
| Deaths in the 3rd Quarter | 15,221 | 17,080 | 11,720 |
Since the epidemic of 1847, which was not unfairly called “the Irish fever,” there has been no such extensive and fatal outbreak of typhus or relapsing fever in England, Scotland or Ireland. The fever deaths rose somewhat in Ireland and in Glasgow in 1851-53, the type of disease being relapsing and typhus. In London there was a considerable increase of typhus in 1856, at the end of the Crimean War. From 1861 to 1867 there was a considerable epidemic of the same fever in England and Scotland (not much of it in Ireland until 1864), the chief centres in England having been the Lancashire towns, Preston, Manchester, Accrington, Chorley, Salford and Blackburn, and the occasion of it the “cotton famine” of the American Civil War[396]. Greenock was the chief seat of typhus in 1863-64 in Scotland; indeed, in the whole kingdom, its death-rate from that cause was approached by that of Liverpool only. Fevers had been very mortal there in the epidemic of 1847 (it is said 353 deaths); in the next fever-period they rose as follows[397]:
| 1860 | 1861 | 1862 | 1863 | 1864 | ||||
| 19 | 57 | 63 | 98 | 274 |
This epidemic was more easily dealt with than those of the same kind before it. Very large sums were subscribed by the wealthy, of which, indeed, a considerable balance remained undistributed. Rawlinson, as engineer, and Villiers, as Minister, devised extensive relief works, in the form of main drainage for the distressed Lancashire towns, the whole cost being defrayed eventually by the municipalities themselves. The following table, from Murchison, shows the admissions for typhus to the fever hospitals of various towns, subsequently to the great epidemic of 1847-48. The first rise in London was in 1856; the next rise, which was somewhat prolonged, coincided with the epidemic in Lancashire.
Hospital Cases of Typhus, 1849-71.
| Year | London Fever Hosp. | Edin. Royal Infirm. | Glasgow Royal Infirm. | Glasgow Fever Hosp. | Dundee Royal Infirm. | Aberdeen Royal Infirm. | Cork Fever Hosp. | |||||||
| 1849 | 155 | — | 342 | — | — | — | — | |||||||
| 1850 | 130 | — | 382 | — | — | — | — | |||||||
| 1851 | 68 | — | 919 | — | — | — | — | |||||||
| 1852 | 204 | — | 1293 | — | — | — | — | |||||||
| 1853 | 408 | — | 1551 | — | — | — | — | |||||||
| 1854 | 337 | — | 760 | — | — | — | — | |||||||
| 1855 | 342 | — | 385 | — | — | — | — | |||||||
| 1856 | 1062 | — | 385 | — | — | — | — | |||||||
| 1857 | 274 | — | 314 | — | — | — | — | |||||||
| 1858 | 15 | — | 175 | — | 17 | — | — | |||||||
| 1859 | 48 | — | 175 | — | 128 | — | — | |||||||
| 1860 | 25 | — | 229 | — | 67 | — | — | |||||||
| 1861 | 86 | — | 509 | — | 129 | — | 116 | |||||||
| 1862 | 1827 | 14 | 780 | — | 54 | — | 272 | |||||||
| 1863 | 1309 | 74 | 1286 | — | 236 | 379 (4 mos.) | 692 | |||||||
| 1864 | 2493 | 212 | 2150 | — | 264 | 811 | 1021 | |||||||
| 1865 | 1950 | 447 | 2334 | 1154 | 891 | 422 | 791 | |||||||
| 1866 | 1760 | 847 | 1055 | 384 | 706 | 167 | 247 | |||||||
| 1867 | 1396 | 303 | 761 | 795 | 225 | 68 | 124 | |||||||
| 1868 | 1964 | 280 | 620 | 1023 | 502 | 78 | 245 | |||||||
| 1869 | 1259 | 259 | 1430 | 2023 | 402 | 170 | 136 | |||||||
| 1870 | 631 | 287 | 947 | 702 | 232 | 61 | 165 | |||||||
| 1871 | 411 | 101 | 418 | 511 | 257 | 3 | 397 | |||||||
During the unusual prevalence of fever in Scotland, 1863-65, it was made clear by the diagnosis in hospitals, that the excess was caused by typhus, and not by enteric.
Of 440 cases of fever treated in the Royal Infirmary of Edinburgh, in 1864, 212 were cases of pure typhus, 140 were enteric fevers, while 88 were simple continued fever and febricula. In the Royal Infirmary of Glasgow in 1864, of 2,190 cases of fever, 2,150 were reported to be cases of typhus fever, while only 40 were cases of enteric fever. In the Aberdeen Royal Infirmary not a case of enteric fever was observed: of 396 cases in the year 1863, 387 were pure typhus, and 9 febricula; and in 1864, of 926 cases, 897 were pure typhus and 29 febricula. In the Royal Infirmary of Dundee, of 355 cases of fever treated in 1864, 318 were typhus, 16 enteric fever, and 21 febricula. It was only at Perth, and there not exclusively in hospital practice, that an excess of typhoid fever was observed; from 1st August, 1863, to 30th April, 1864 (months which included the special typhoid season), there were 101 cases of gastro-enteric or typhoid fever, 46 cases of typhus, 19 of relapsing fever, and 59 of simple continued fever[398].
The last considerable prevalence of contagious fever in England and Scotland was in 1869 and 1870. It was relapsing fever, mixed with some typhus, and it was restricted almost to a few large towns, including London, Liverpool, Manchester, Leeds, Bradford, Glasgow, and Edinburgh[399]. It was first seen in London in 1868 among Polish Jews. It was heard of as late as 1872 at Newcastle. It was observed during this epidemic in Liverpool, Bradford and Edinburgh that the subjects of the relapsing fever were not suffering from want[400]. The same observation has been made in some foreign countries. Still, on the great scale and in a broad view, relapsing fever has been typhus famelicus or famine-fever, occurring in association with other maladies due to want, and especially in the circumstances which have been discussed fully in the chapter on fevers in Ireland.