XI

STRENGTH AND LOSSES OF MARMONT’S ARMY AT SALAMANCA

To fix the fighting strength of Marmont’s army at Salamanca is comparatively easy. It consisted of the 49,636 officers and men accounted for by the return of July 15th printed on the next page, minus some 700 men lost at the combats of Castrillo and Castrejon [also called ‘combat of the Guarena’] on July 18, and such few hundreds more as may have fallen behind from fatigue during the long marches of July 20-1. Roughly speaking, it must have counted some 48,500 men, as opposed to Wellington’s 50,000. The French translators of Napier’s Peninsular War (Mathieu Dumas and Foltz) only give a table of June 15, which is of course a month out of date for Salamanca, and append a note that ‘deducting artillery, engineers, équipages militaires, officers, sergeants, and garrisons, as also losses between June 15 and July 15 they find the result of about 42,000 sabres and bayonets for the battle.’ Why any sane person should deduct officers, sergeants, and artillerymen from a fighting total I am unable to conceive, though contemporary British writers, including Wellington himself, often did so. But the results of adding to their ‘42,000 sabres and bayonets’ the list of 1,925 officers, 3,244 artillerymen and artillery train (both in the divisions and in the reserve), 332 engineers, and 742 équipages militaires, is to give the figure 48,343, which practically agrees with the total that I state above; if sergeants are added it would much exceed that total. We may take this, therefore, as fairly correct—bearing in mind that the 26 officers and 742 men of the équipages militaires cannot be counted as combatants.

These totals do not include the 23rd Léger (2 batts.) and the 2/1st Line, both from Thomières’s division, which were garrisoning Astorga, about 1,500 strong. Nor do they include the minor garrisons left at Toro, Zamora, Olmedo, Valdestillas, Tordesillas, Simancas, Cabezon, Medina del Campo, Puente de Duero, Tudela de Douro, Amagro, &c., which appear to have been altogether about 4,184 strong, nor the dépôts at Valladolid, 3,307 strong on June 15, but probably much less on July 15, when Marmont had remounted nearly 1,000 dismounted dragoons and picked up all detachments and convalescents that he could gather. Nor do they include the sick, who had been 8,633 on June 15th, and 8,332 on May 15th—probably the total in hospital was a trifle more on July 15, owing to the fatigues of the campaigns round San Cristobal in the latter days of June.

Parallel with the return of July 15th, I have printed that of August 1. The difference between the two—211 officers and 10,124 men—might be supposed to represent the losses in the campaign between those dates. It does not, however, because the total of August 1 represents not only the survivors from the battle of Salamanca, but all the men from garrisons evacuated after it, and from the Valladolid dépôt, who joined the colours after the disaster of July 22, in consequence of the district in which they were lying having been evacuated by the army. The garrisons of Toro and Zamora held out till they were relieved, that of Tordesillas surrendered to the Galicians: but the men from the other smaller garrisons and from the dépôts fell in to their respective corps before August 1. I imagine that we may take these additions to be some 5,000 men at least, but cannot give the exact figures, through being unable to say what the Valladolid dépôts (3,307 strong on June 15) amounted to on July 15.

After comparing the totals of the brigades and regiments shown under July 15 and August 1, we must proceed to show the reasons why, in individual cases, the regimental differences between the two sets of figures cannot be taken to represent the sum of the losses in the Salamanca campaign. The proof is clear.

THE ARMY OF PORTUGAL BEFORE AND AFTER THE BATTLE OF SALAMANCA

From two returns of effectives in the Archives of the Ministry of War, Paris,
dated July 15 and August 1, respectively.

July 15.August 1.
Officers.Men.Officers.Men.
1st Division (Foy):
Brigade Chemineau 6th Léger (2 batts.)461,05541684
69th Ligne (2 batts.)501,408471,322
Brigade
Desgraviers-Berthelot
39th Ligne (2 batts.)4991849872
76th Ligne (2 batts.)561,35145887
Artillery Train, &c.72077207
Divisional Total2084,9391893,972
2nd Division (Clausel):
Brigade Berlier 25th Léger (3 batts.)541,485431,222
27th Ligne (2 batts.)401,637311,248
Brigade Barbot 50th Ligne (3 batts.)521,490461,177
59th Ligne (2 batts.)471,531381,278
Artillery Train, &c.72197216
Divisional Total2006,3621655,141
3rd Division (Ferey):
Brigade Menne 31st Léger (2 batts.)461,359451,325
26th Ligne (2 batts.)441,145431,116
? 47th Ligne (3 batts.)671,558621,650
70th Ligne (2 batts.)491,114361,061
Artillery Train, &c.53023193
Divisional Total2115,4781895,345
4th Division (Sarrut):
Brigade Fririon 2nd Léger (3 batts.)661,772681,702
36th Ligne (3 batts.)691,570711,514
Brigade ? 4th Léger (3 batts.)631,21963989
130th Ligne (absent)
Artillery Train, &c.52385214
Divisional Total2034,7992074,419
5th Division (Maucune):
Brigade Arnaud 15th Ligne (3 batts.)521,615461,229
66th Ligne (2 batts.)381,13134661
Brigade Montfort 82nd Ligne (2 batts.)4196639729
86th Ligne (2 batts.)301,15528961
Artillery Train, &c.42124212
Divisional Total1655,0791513,792
6th Division (Brennier):
Brigade Taupin 17th Léger (2 batts.)461,07442855
65th Ligne (3 batts.)591,527521,302
? 22nd Ligne (3 batts.)611,48640716
Régiment de Prusse
(remnant of)
979979
Artillery Train, &c.42134213
Divisional Total1794,3791473,165
7th Division (Thomières):
Brigade Bonté 1st Line (3 batts.)[775]801,683791,454
62nd Line (2 batts.)471,076451,048
? 23rd Léger (absent)[776]
101st Line (3 batts.)611,38829412
Artillery Train, &c.5203nilnil
Divisional Total1934,3501532,914
8th Division (Bonnet):
Brigade Gautier 118th Line (3 batts.)531,584371,024
119th Line (3 batts.)641,26548831
? 120th Line (3 batts.)631,745661,152
122nd Line (3 batts.)551,582401,000
Artillery Train, &c.3107nilnil
Divisional Total2386,2831914,007
Light Cavalry Division (Curto):
? 3rd Hussars (3 squadrons)1723114165
22nd Chasseurs (2 squadrons)1723618233
26th Chasseurs (2 squadrons)1627818225
28th Chasseurs (1 squadron)787352
? 13th Chasseurs (5 squadrons)2049628426
14th Chasseurs (4 squadrons)1430818332
Escadron de marche11141952
Divisional Total1021,7771081,472
Heavy Cavalry Division (Boyer):
? 6th Dragoons (2 squadrons)1937619332
11th Dragoons (2 squadrons)1941118359
Brigade Carrié 15th Dragoons (2 squadrons)1532816294
25th Dragoons (2 squadrons)1831418282
Artillery attached to cavalry31933148
Divisional Total741,622741,415
Total Cavalry Divisions1763,3991822,887
Artillery Reserve, Park, &c.501,45022707
Engineers and Sappers1733216345
Gendarmerie61296186
Équipages militaires2674222707
État-Major Général5454
General Total Infantry Divisions1,59741,6691,39232,755
Cavalry Divisions1763,3991822,887
Auxiliary Arms1532,6531201,945
1,92547,7211,69437,587

N.B.—Guns, July 15, 78; August 1, 58; lost 7 12-pounders, 3 8-pounders, 9 4-pounders, 1 3-pounder. Horses, July 15, 4,278; August 1, 3,231. Draught horses, July 15, 2,037; August 1, 1,847. Équipages militaires, horses, July 15, 800; August 1, 331.

To these two tables we must append, as a side-light, the results of a compilation of the totals of officers killed and wounded at Salamanca, from Martinien’s admirable Liste des officiers tués et blessés pendant les guerres de l’Empire. This of course does not include unwounded prisoners.

Killed.Wounded.
Foy’s Division (including losses at Garcia
Hernandez on July 23rd):
6th Léger110=11
69th Line28=10
39th Line2=2
76th Line17=8
Total31
Clausel’s Division:
25th Léger410=14[777]
27th Line25=7
50th Line917=26
50th Line415=19
Total66
Ferey’s Division:
31st Léger16=7
26th Line6=6
47th Line513=18
70th Line23=5
Total36
Sarrut’s Division:
2nd Léger3=3
36th Line3=3
4th Léger2=2
Total8
Maucune’s Division:
15th Line412=16
66th Line215=17
82nd Line17=8
86th Line3=3
Total44
Brennier’s Division:
17th Léger13=4[778]
65th Line18=9[779]
22nd Line219=21[780]
Total34
Thomières’s Division:
1st Line4=4
62nd Line114=15
101st Line619=25
Total44
Bonnet’s Division:
118th Line218=20
119th Line323=26
120th Line8=8
122nd Line313=16
Total70
Curto’s Light Cavalry:
3rd Hussars2[781]
13th Chasseurs7
14th Chasseurs5[782]
22nd Chasseurs5
26th Chasseurs4
28th Chasseurs2
Total25
Boyer’s Division of Dragoons:
6th Dragoons9
11th Dragoons2[783]
15th Dragoons1[784]
25th Dragoons6[785]
Total18
Artillery, Horse1
Artillery, Field5
Artillery, Train1
Total7
Engineers3=3
Staff317[786]=20
Miscellaneous
officers, whose
regiments were
not present at
Salamanca
2=2

General total 60 officers killed, 347 wounded at Salamanca and Garcia Hernandez; plus 7 officers killed and 27 wounded at the Guarena on July 18, and 2 wounded in minor engagements.

Loss in killed and wounded, not including unwounded prisoners, during the campaign, 67 killed, 376 wounded = 443 officers in all.

After arriving at this general loss in killed and wounded officers, so far as is possible from Martinien’s tables, which are not quite complete for all corps, it only remains to estimate the unwounded prisoners. I searched the immense volumes of rolls of French officers in captivity at the Record Office, and found 63 names of prisoners taken at Salamanca, the Guarena, and Garcia Hernandez. A few of these duplicate the names of wounded officers to be found in Martinien’s tables, the remainder must represent the unwounded prisoners. Wellington in his Salamanca dispatch wrote that he had 137 French officers prisoners—evidently the larger number of them must have been wounded, as only 63 were sent off to England that autumn. Probably many died in hospital. Prisoners are most numerous from the 101st, 22nd, and from Foy’s two regiments cut up at Garcia Hernandez, the 76th and 6th Léger.

In the Library of the Archives de la Guerre at the Paris Ministry of War I went through the regimental histories of all the French infantry regiments present at Salamanca. Like our own similar compilations, they differ much in value—some are very full and with statistics carefully worked out from regimental reports and pay-books; others are very thin and factless. Fourteen units give their losses, which I herewith annex:

Clausel’s Division: 25th Léger, 336; 27th Line, 159; 59th Line, 350.

Ferey’s Division: 70th Line, 111; 31st Léger, 340.

Sarrut’s Division: 2nd Léger, 202.

Maucune’s Division: 15th Line, 359.

Brennier’s Division: 17th Léger, 264; 65th Line, 359.

Thomières’s Division: 1st Line, 227; 62nd Line, 868; 101st Line, 1,000.

Bonnet’s Division: 120th, 458; 122nd, 527.

The total of this makes 5,560 for these fourteen corps; we leave fifteen others unaccounted for. As a rough calculation I suppose that we may hold that as these regiments lost, as we know from Martinien’s lists [which are not quite complete], at least 152 officers out of 5,560 of all ranks, then the other fifteen regiments with 181 officers killed or wounded must have lost something like 6,000. The vagaries of the proportion between officers and men hit are extraordinary in individual units, but these tend to rectify themselves on a large total consisting of many regiments. I therefore believe that 11,560 would be something very like the total loss killed and wounded in the French infantry. We have then to allow for some 40 unwounded officers taken prisoners, and corresponding to them perhaps 1,200 unwounded men. The total loss for the infantry would thus be 12,800. For cavalry and artillery, &c., 53 officers hit—as by Martinien’s tables—must imply something over a thousand men lost. We should thus arrive at a total of 14,000 for the casualties—the sum which I suggest in my text (p. 469).

To show the worthlessness of any attempt to deduce the French losses by a mere comparison of the official ‘morning states’ of July 15 and August 1, the following instances may suffice.

The 65th Line shows 59 officers and 1,527 men present on July 15, 52 officers and 1,302 men on August 1. The apparent loss is 7 officers and 225 men. But this unit’s regimental report shows 3 officers killed, 5 officers wounded, 204 men killed or prisoners, 106 men wounded, 39 missing; total, 8 officers and 349 men. Therefore, as is obvious, one officer and 124 men must have joined from somewhere (dépôt at Valladolid?) between the two dates, or the deficiency would be 125 greater between the ‘present under arms’ of the two dates than is shown.

A more striking case is the 62nd Line, of Thomières’s Division. It shows present on July 15, 47 officers and 1,076 men, on August 1st 45 officers and 1,048 men—the apparent loss is only 2 officers and 28 men. But Martinien’s lists show us that the regiment lost at least 15 officers, killed and wounded, and the regimental report gives 20 officers and 848 men killed, wounded, or missing! The real loss is 868 not 30! Therefore 18 officers and about 800 men, the equivalent of a strong battalion, must have joined between July 15 and August 1. This corresponds to the fact that the 62nd showed only 2 battalions[787] at Salamanca, while the ‘morning state’ of June 15th showed it as having at the front three battalions and 1,900 rank and file. Clearly the third battalion rejoined the colours after the battle—having presumably been quartered in the small garrisons of Castile evacuated after the disaster of July 22. Many men must also have rejoined the other two battalions.

But the most absurd case of all is that of the 47th Line, whose total figures actually go up from 1,625 to 1,712 of all ranks between July 15th and August 1st—in despite of the fact that it lost (as Martinien’s lists show), 18 officers and not less therefore than 360 rank and file (20 men per officer is a low allowance) at Salamanca. It must have picked up from Valladolid and the small garrisons 13 officers and 452 men at least[788].

Clausel, writing to King Joseph on July 25, said that of the whole Army of Portugal he could not yet show in the field on that day 20,000 men. This tallies well enough with the conclusion that we have already drawn, that the total loss from the army, which on July 15 had about 48,000 men, must have been some 14,000 killed, wounded, and prisoners, and over 10,000 men dispersed who were only just rallying.