DESCRIPTION OF THE TABLES
| PAGE | ||
| Summary of evidence in favour of finger marks being persistent | [96] | |
| Interpolation of ridges | [104] | |
| I. | Percentage frequency of Arches, Loops, and Whorls on thedifferent digits, as observed in the 5000 digits of 500 different persons | [115] |
| II. | Distribution of the A. L. W. patterns on the corresponding digitsof the two hands | [116] |
| III. | Percentage frequency of Arches on the digits of the two hands | [117] |
| IV. | Percentage frequency of Loops on the digits of the two hands | [118] |
| V. | Percentage frequency of Whorls on the digits of the two hands | [118] |
| VIa. | Percentage of cases in which the same class of pattern occursin the same digits of the two hands | [120] |
| VIb. | Percentage of cases in which the same class of pattern occursin various couplets of different digits | [120] |
| VII. | Couplets of fingers of different names in the same and in the opposite hands | [121] |
| VIII. | Measures of relationship between the digits on a centesimal scale | [129] |
| IX. | Index to 100 sets of finger prints | [133] |
| X. | Number of different index-heads in 100 sets, according to the number of digits noted | [136] |
| XI. | Number of entries under the same heads in 100 sets | [139] |
| XII. | Index-headings under which more than 1 per cent of the sets were registered in 500 sets | [140] |
| XIII. | Percentage of entries falling under a single head in 100, 300, and 500 sets | [141] |
| XIV. | Number of different index-headings in 100 sets, according to the number of fingers in each set, and to the method of indexing | [142] |
| XV. | Number of entries in 500 sets, each of the fore, middle, and ring-fingers only | [146] |
| XVI. | Number of cases of various anthropometric datathat severally fell in the three classes of large, medium, and small, when certain limiting values were adopted | [159] |
| XVII. | Distribution of 500 sets of measures, each set consisting of five elements, into classes | [160] |
| XVIII. | Number of the above sets that fell under the same headings | [161] |
| XIX. | Further analysis of the two headings that contained the most numerous entries | [162] |
| XX. | Observed random couplets | [174] |
| XXI. | Calculated random couplets | [174] |
| XXII. | Observed fraternal couplets | [175] |
| XXIII. | Fraternal couplets—random, observed, and utmost feasible | [176] |
| XXIV. | Three fingers of right hand in 150 fraternal couplets | [181] |
| XXV. | Three fingers of right hand in 150 fraternal couplets—random and observed | [182] |
| XXVI. | Three fingers of right hand in 150 fraternal couplets—resemblance measured on centesimal scale | [182] |
| XXVII. | Twins | [186] |
| XXVIII. | Children of like-patterned parents | [188] |
| XXIX. | Paternal and maternal influence | [190] |
| XXX. | Different races, percentage frequency of arches in fore-finger | [194] |
| XXXI. | Distribution of number of ridges in AH, and of other measures in loops | [203] |
| XXXII. | Ordinates to their schemes of distribution | [204] |
| XXXIII. | Comparison of the above with calculated values | [205] |
| XXXIV. | Proportions of a typical loop on the right and left thumbs respectively | [209] |