The Achromatic Objective.
Fig. 110.—Pan-aplanatic Achromatic Objectives.
The Achromatic Objective, of all the optical and mechanical adjuncts to the microscope, is in every way the most necessary, as well as the most important. The ideal of perfection aimed at by the optician is a combination of lenses that shall produce a perfect image—that is, one absolutely perfect in definition and almost free from colour. The method resorted to for the elimination of spherical and chromatic aberration in the lens has been fully explained in a former chapter. It will now be my endeavour to show the progressive stages of achromatism and evolution of the microscope throughout the present century.
It is almost as difficult to assign the date of the earliest application of achromatism to the microscope as to that of the inception and many modifications of the instrument in past ages; indeed, the question of priority in every step taken in its improvement has been the subject of controversy.
Among the earlier workers in the first decade of this century will be found the name of Bernardo Marzoni, who was curator of the Physical Laboratory of the Lyceum of Brescia. He, an amateur optician, it has come to light, in 1808 constructed an achromatic objective, and exhibited it at Milan in 1811, when he obtained the award of a silver medal for its merits, under the authority of the “Institute Reale delli Scienzo.” Through the good offices of the late Mr. John Mayall one of Marzoni’s objectives, which had been carefully preserved, was presented to the Royal Microscopical Society of London in 1890.[20] This objective is a cemented combination, with the plane side of the flint-lens presented to the object. This was an improvement of a practical kind, and of which Chevalier subsequently availed himself. In 1823 Selligue, a French optician, is credited with having first suggested the plan of combining two, three, or four plano-convex achromatic doublets of similar foci, one above the other, to increase the power and the aperture of the microscope. Fresnel, who reported upon this invention, preferred on the whole Adam’s arrangement, because it gave a larger field. Selligue subsequently improved his objective by placing a small diaphragm between the mirror and the object.
In this country, Tully was induced by Dr. Goring to work at the achromatic objective, and his first efforts were attended with a success quite equal to that of Chevalier’s. Lister on examining these lenses said:—“The French optician knows nothing of the value of aperture, but he has shown us that fine performance is not confined to triple objectives.” Amici, the amateur optician of Modena, visited this country in 1827 and brought his achromatic microscope and objectives, which were seen to give increase of aperture by combining doublets with triplets. The most lasting improvement in the achromatic objective was that of Joseph Jackson Lister, F.R.S., the father of Lord Lister, and one of the founders of the Royal Microscopical Society of London.
Lister’s discoveries at this period (1829) in the history of the optics of the microscope were of greater importance than they have been represented to be. That he was an enthusiast is manifest, for, being unable to find an optician to carry out his formula for grinding lenses, he at once set to work to grind his own, and in a short time was able to make a lens which was said to be the best of the day.
Lister, in a paper contributed to the proceedings of the Royal Society the same year, pointed out how the aberrations of one doublet could be neutralised by a second. He further demonstrated that the flint lens should be a plano-concave joined by a permanent cement to the convex crown-glass. The first condition, he states, “obviates the risk of error in centring the two curves, and the second diminishes by one half the loss of light from reflection, which is very great at the numerous surfaces of every combination.” These two conditions then—that the flint lens shall be plano-concave, and that it shall be joined by some cement (Canada balsam) to the convex—may be taken as the basis for the microscopic objective, provided they can be reconciled with the correction of spherical and chromatic aberration of a large pencil.
Andrew Ross was not slow to perceive the value of Lister’s suggestions and in 1831 he had constructed an object-glass on the lines laid down by Lister, [Fig. 112]; a a′ representing the anterior pair, m the middle, and p the posterior, the three sets combined forming the achromatic objective, consisting of three pairs of lenses, a double-convex crown-glass, and a plano-concave of flint.
Fig. 111.—Lister’s double-convex crown and plano-concave flint cemented combination.
Fig. 112.—Andrew Ross’s ¼-inch Objective.
Lister proposed other combinations, and himself made an object-glass consisting of a meniscus pair with a triple middle, and a back plano-convex doublet. This had a working distance of ·11 and proved to be so great a success that other opticians—Hugh Powell, 1834; James Smith, 1839—made objectives after the same formula.
The publication of Lister’s data proved of value in another direction: it stimulated opticians to apply themselves to the further improvement of the achromatic objective. Andrew Ross was one of the more earnest workers in giving effect to Lister’s principles and a short time afterwards found that a triple combination, with the lenses separated by short intervals, gave better results. In the accompanying diagram the changes made in the combination of the objective from 1831, and extending over a period of about twenty years from this date, are shown.
Each objective, from the ½-inch to the 1⁄12-inch, is seen to be built up of at least six or eight different fronts, the back combinations being a triplet formed of two double-convex lenses of crown glass with an intermediary double concave lens of flint-glass.
Fig. 113.—Combinations of Early Dry Objectives.
A, Double-convex lens; B, Plano-concave; C, Bi-convex and plano-concave united; shown in their various combinations, as at D, form the 3-in., 2-in. or 1½-in.; at E, 1-in. and 2⁄3-in.; and at F, the ½-in., 4⁄10-in., ¼-in. and 1⁄25-in. objectives.
Combination D was for many years known as the Norfolk Objective.
Fig. 114.—Lister’s CorrectionCollar, (in section).
No sooner had Ross constructed ¼-inch achromatic objectives on Lister’s formula than he discovered an error which had hitherto escaped attention, viz., that the thinnest cover-glass of an object produced a considerable amount of refractive disturbance. A marked difference was observed in the image when viewed with or without a cover-glass. This difficulty was first met by the addition of a draw-tube to the microscope body. But as this also impaired the image, Lister overcame the difficulty by mounting the front lens of the objective in a separate tube made to fit over a second tube carrying the two pairs of lenses. This arrangement led up to his invention of the screw-collar adjustment, the mechanism for applying which is shown in [Fig. 114]. The anterior lens a at the end of the tube is enclosed in a brass-piece b containing the combination; the tube a, holding the lens nearest the object, is then made to move up or down the cylinder b, thus varying the distance, according to the thickness of the glass covering the object, by turning the screw ring c, thus causing the one tube to slide over the other, and clamping them together when properly adjusted. An aperture is made in the tube a, within which is seen a mark engraved on the cylinder, on the edge of which are two marks, a longer and a shorter, engraved upon the tube. When the mark on the cylinder coincides with the longer mark on the tube, the adjustment is made for an uncovered object; and when the coincidence is with the shorter mark, the proper distance is obtained to balance the aberrations produced by a cover-glass the hundredth of an inch thick; such glass covers are now supplied. The adjustment should be tested experimentally by moving the milled edge which separates or closes the combinations, and at the same time using the fine adjusting screw of the microscope. The difficulty associated with the cover-glass of old has, by the introduction of the homogeneous immersion system, been very nearly eliminated. There still remains, however, a disturbing amount of residual colour aberration in the achromatic dry objective, and for the correction of which Zeiss proposed mounting the several lenses on a method somewhat different to that so long in use in this country. [Fig. 115] shows an objective in which the screw-collar ring b b is made to adjust the exact distance between the two back lenses placed at a a. The value of the screw-collar is not questioned. It is difficult to obtain at all times cover-glasses of a perfectly uniform thickness; they will vary, and therefore perfect definition must be obtained, as heretofore, by adjusting for each separate preparation while the object is under examination.
Fig. 115.—The Continental Screw-collar Adjustment.
As early as 1842 the excellence of Andrew Ross’s achromatic objectives were acknowledged, and his formula for their construction was generally followed. No doubt many of these early objectives of his manufacture are still regarded as treasures. I possess a ½-inch and a ¼-inch, which I believe to be comparable with any achromatic objectives of the same apertures of the present day. These I have always found most serviceable for histological work.
In 1850 Mr. Wenham produced an achromatic objective of considerable achromatic value. This consisted of a single hemispherical front combination, shown in the accompanying enlarged diagram, [Fig. 116]. Wenham’s formula seems to have been generally adopted by Continental opticians, who sold these lenses at a reduction of price. In Paris, Prazmowski and Hartnack—I have had one of Hartnack’s earliest immersions in use for many years—brought this form of objective to greater perfection, and in 1867 Powell and Lealand adopted the single front combination system in their early water-immersion objective, whereby the focal distance was said to be “practically a constant quantity, while reduction of aperture by making the front lens thinner ensures a much greater working distance without affecting the aberrations, since the first refraction takes place at the posterior or curved surface of the front lens, the removal of any portion of thickness at the anterior or plane surface simply cuts off zones of peripheral rays without altering the distance—any space being filled by the homogeneous immersion fluid, or by an extra thickness of cover-glass.”[21]
Fig. 116.—A Single Front Combination formulated by Wenham for Messrs. Ross (enlarged).
Great improvements were brought about by R. B. Tolles, of Boston, 1874, in the objective, as well as in the optical and mechanical parts of the microscope, most of which, however, must be ascribed to the criticisms and suggestions of amateur workers skilled in the exhibition of test-objects—the late Dr. Woodward of Washington, for example, whose series of photographs of the more difficult frustules of diatoms have rarely been surpassed. Such results were due to improvements made in the optical part of the microscope at his suggestion. He came to the conclusion, arrived at about the same time by mathematical scientists, that increase of power in the microscope was only possible in two directions, the qualitative and the quantitative.
It was now that microscopists turned to the late Professor Abbe for assistance in perfecting the objective in the dioptric direction. This, he pointed out, must be looked for in further improvements in the art of glass-making.
A series of experiments ultimately brought to light a mineral substance, Fluorite, which, when combined in the proper proportion, one part to two of German crown and flint glass, was found to have the qualities looked for, and to possess different relations of a dispersive and refractive power. From Professor Abbe’s researches, begun in 1876, we have had the aperture of the objective greatly enlarged, and the homogeneous system brought into general use.
Previous to this date the best made objective merely approximated to colour correction. Undoubtedly the chief object to be obtained was the removal or diminution of the secondary colour aberration. This, together with other residual errors Abbe pointed out in 1880, led to the improvement of the optical quality of the glass used in the manufacture of all optical instruments, the chief difficulties being surmounted in the Jena glass factory, whereby a complete revolution was effected in the microscopic objective. The apochromatic glasses of Zeiss, Powell, Beck, Ross, Watson, Swift, and other makers, in which the secondary spectrum has been totally eliminated, or only a negligible tertiary spectrum remains—that is to say, the objectives of these makers—are now corrected for three spectrum rays, and not two, as in the older objectives; and only those who look forward for making further discoveries in the intimate structure of bacilli or for resolving the finest diatom markings can be said to fully appreciate the importance and value of the investigations of the late Professor Abbe, and which have, so to speak, entirely changed old empirical views as to the value of high aperture, and demonstrated that high amplification, unless associated by proportionally high aperture, necessarily produces untrue images of minute structures. It was he also who introduced a practically perfect system of estimating apertures, known as the “numerical aperture notation,” by which not only can an accurate comparison be made of the relative apertures of any series of objectives, whether dry or immersion, but their resolving power under the various conditions of the kind of light employed. Their penetrating power and their illuminating power can now be estimated with mathematical exactness.
Fig. 117.—Diagram of an Apochromatic Combination.
The practical advantages, then, secured by the adoption of the homogeneous system were, on the whole, greater than any before made or believed to be possible, and when taken into account in connection with the improvement of the eye-piece (also due to Abbe), almost perfect achromatism and homogeneity between objective, object, and eye-piece is secured, together with a sharp definition of the image over the whole visual field. These, with an increase of working distance between the object and the objective, and other important results, have been placed within the reach of the microscopist by men of science, and the outcome is the general adoption of the homogeneous system, termed by Carl Zeiss, a fellow-worker with Abbe, the[22] apochromatic system of constructing objectives.