TABLE VII
| Obs. | Single Tactual | Single Visual | Combined Tactual and Visual | |
| A | Number of series | |||
| averaged | 3 | 3 | 3 | |
| Per cent Correct | 80 | 89 | 79 | |
| Judgments | \———⌄———/ | |||
| Average | 84 | |||
| B | Number of series | |||
| averaged | 5 | 5 | 5 | |
| Per cent Correct | 72 | 78 | 78 | |
| Judgments | \———⌄———/ | |||
| Average | 75 | |||
| Bo | Number of series | |||
| averaged | 5 | 5 | 5 | |
| Per cent Correct | 88 | 71 | 78 | |
| Judgments | \———⌄———/ | |||
| Average | 79 | |||
In Table VIII are given A's results for further experimentation under the same conditions, also for a pair of visual judgments, a pair of tactual, and all four combined. One series of each of the five was given each hour of experimentation. For the additional visual judgment, the observer was required to say whether the line was high or low. It was of two heights from the lower edge of the card, 17 mm. and 20 mm. For the other tactual judgment, he reported the point or points touched on the hand, as on the right or left side. The middle line was traced by the experimenter, before tests, as often as the observer wished to be reassured of its position.