P. W. Schmidt, Die Geschichte Jesu, ii. (Erläuterungen—Explanations). Tübingen, 1904, p. 157 ff.
See the classical discussion in J. Weiss, Die Predigt Jesus vom Reiche Gottes, 1892, 1st ed., p. 52 ff.
In the second edition, of 1900, p. 160 ff., he allows himself to be led astray by the “chiefest apostles” of modern theology to indulge in the subtleties of fine-spun psychology, and explain Jesus' way of speaking of Himself in the third person as the Son of Man as due to the “extreme modesty of Jesus,” a modesty which did not forsake Him in the presence of His judges. This recent access of psychologising exegesis has not conduced to clearness of presentation, and the preference for the Lucan narrative does not so much contribute to throw light on the facts as to discover in the thoughts of Jesus subtleties of which the historical Jesus never dreamt. If the Lord always used the term Son of Man when speaking of His Messiahship, the reason was that this was the only way in which He could speak of it at all, since the Messiahship was not yet realised, but was only to be so at the appearing of the Son of Man. For a consistent, purely historical, non-psychological exposition of the Son-of-Man passages see Albert Schweitzer, Das Messianitäts- und Leidensgeheimnis. (The Secret of the Messiahship and the Passion.) A sketch of the Life of Jesus. Tübingen, 1901.
See Dalman, p. 60 ff.
John Lightfoot, Horae Hebraicae et Talmudicae in quatuor Evangelistas. Edited by J. B. Carpzov. Leipzig, 1684.
Christian Schöttgen, Horae Hebraicae et Talmudicae in universum Novum Testamentum. Dresden-Leipzig, 1733.
Joh. Gerh. Meuschen, Novum Testamentum ex Talmude et antiquitatibus Hebraeorum illustratum. Leipzig, 1736.
J. Jakob. Wettstein, Novum Testamentum Graecum. Amsterdam, 1751 and 1752.
F. Nork, Rabbinische Quellen und Parallelen zu neutestamentlichen Schriftstellen, Leipzig, 1839.
Franz Delitzsch, “Horae Hebraicae et Talmudicae,” in the Luth. Zeitsch., 1876-1878.