As in the higher plants, mineral substances can only be taken up when they are in a state of solution. Lichens are therefore dependent on the substances that are contained in the water of absorption: they must receive their inorganic nutriment by the same channels that water is conveyed to them.
a. Foliose and Fruticose Lichens. These larger lichens are provided with rhizinae or with hold-fasts, which are only absorptive to a very limited extent; the main source of water supply is from the atmosphere and the salts required in the metabolism of the cell must be obtained there also—from atmospheric dust dissolved in rain, or from wind-borne particles deposited on the surface of the thallus which may be gradually dissolved and absorbed by the cortical and growing hyphae. That substances received from the atmospheric environment may be all important is shown by the exclusive habitat of some marine lichens; the Roccellae, Lichinae, some species of Ramalina and others which grow only on rocky shores are almost as dependent on sea-water as are the submerged algae. Other lichens, such as Hydrothyria venosa and Lecanora lacustris, grow in streams, or on boulders that are subject to constant inundation, and they obtain their inorganic food mainly, if not entirely, from an aqueous medium.
Though lichens cannot live in an atmosphere polluted by smoke, they thrive on trees and walls by the road-side where they are liable to be almost smothered by soil-dust. West[843] has observed that they flourish in valleys that are swept by moisture laden winds more especially if near to a highway, where animal excreta are mingled with the dust. The favourite habitats of Xanthoria parietina are the walls and roofs of farm-buildings where the dust must contain a large percentage of nitrogenous material; or stones by the sea-shore that are the haunts of sea-birds. Sandstede[844] found on the island of Rügen that while the perpendicular faces of the cliffs were quite bare, the tops bore a plentiful crop of Lecanora saxicola, Xanthoria lychnea and Candellariella vitellina. He attributed their selection of habitat to the presence of the excreta of sea-birds. As already stated the connection of foliose and fruticose lichens with the substratum is mainly mechanical but occasionally a kind of semiparasitism may arise. Friedrich[845] gives an instance in a species of Usnea of unusually vigorous development. It grew on bark and the strands of hyphae, branching from the root-base of the lichen, had reached down to the living tissue of the tree-trunk and had penetrated between the cells by dissolving the middle lamella. It was possible to find holes pierced in the cell-walls of the host, but it was difficult to decide if the hyphae had attacked living cells or were merely preying on dead material. Lindau[846] held very strongly that lichen hyphae were non-parasitic, and merely split apart the tissues already dead, and the instance recorded by Friedrich is of rare occurrence[847].
That the substratum does have some indirect influence on these larger lichens has been proved once and again. Uloth[848], a chemist as well as a botanist, made analyses of plants of Evernia prunastri taken from birch bark and from sandstone. Qualitatively the composition of the lichen substances was the same, but the quantities varied considerably. Zopf[849] has, more recently, compared the acid content of a form of Evernia furfuracea on rock with that of the same species growing on the bark of a tree. In the case of the latter, the thallus produced 4 per cent. of physodic acid and 2·2 per cent. of atranorin. In the rock specimen, which, he adds, was a more graceful plant than the other, the quantities were 6 per cent. of physodic acid, and 2·75 per cent. of atranorin. In both cases there was a slight formation of furfuracinnic acid. He found also that specimens of Evernia prunastri on dead wood contained 8·4 per cent. of lichen-acids, while in those from living trees there was only 4·4 per cent. or even less. Other conditions, however, might have contributed to this result, as Zopf[850] found later that this lichen when very sorediate yielded an increased supply of atranoric acid.
Ohlert[851], who made a study of lichens in relation to their habitat, found that though a certain number grew more or less freely on either tree, rock or soil, none of them was entirely unaffected. Usnea barbata, Evernia prunastri and Parmelia physodes were the most indifferent to habitat; normally they are corticolous species, but Usnea on soil formed more slender filaments, and Evernia on the same substratum showed a tendency to horizontal growth, and became attached at various points instead of by the usual single base.
b. Crustaceous Lichens. The crustaceous forms on rocks are in a more favourable position for obtaining inorganic salts, the lower medullary hyphae being in direct contact with mineral substances and able to act directly on them. Many species are largely or even exclusively calcicolous, and there must be something in the lime that is especially conducive to their growth. The hyphae have been traced into the limestone to a depth of 15 mm.[852] and small depressions are frequently scooped out of the rock by the action of the lichen, thus giving a lodgement to the foveolate fruit.
On rocks mainly composed of silica, the lichen has a much harder substance to deal with, and one less easily affected by acids, though even silica may be dissolved in time. Uloth[853] concluded from his observations that the relation of plants to the substratum was chemical even more than physical, so far as crustaceous species were concerned. He found that the surface of the area of rock inhabited was distinctly marked: even such a hard substance as chalcedony was corroded by a very luxuriant lichen flora, the border of growth being quite clearly outlined. The corrosive action is due he considered to the carbon dioxide liberated by the plant, though oxalic acid, so frequent a constituent of lichens, may also share in the corrosion. Egeling[854] made similar observations in regard to the effect of lichen growth on granite rocks; and he further noticed that pieces of glass, over which lichens had spread, had become clouded, the dulness of the surface being due to a multitude of small cracks eaten out by the hyphae. Buchet[855] also gives an instance of glass which had been corroded by the action of lichen hyphae. It formed part of an old stained window in a chapel that was obscured by a lichen growth which adhered tenaciously. When the window was taken down and cleaned, it was found that the surface of the glass was covered with small, more or less hemispherical pits which were often confluent. The different colours in the picture were unequally attacked, some of the figures or draperies being covered with the minute excavations, while other parts were intact. It happened also, occasionally, that a colour while slightly corroded in one pane would be uninjured in another, but the suggestion is made that there might in that case have been a difference in the length of attack by the lichen. The selection of colours by the lichens might also be influenced by some chemical or physical characters.
Bachmann[856] found that on granite there is equally a selection of material by the hyphae: as a rule they avoid the acid silica constituents; while they penetrate and traverse the grains of mica which are dissolved by them exactly as are lime granules.
On another rock consisting mainly of muscovite and quartz he[857] found that crystals of garnet embedded in the rock were reduced to a powder by the action of the lichen. He concludes that the destroying action of the hyphae is accelerated by the presence of carbon dioxide given off by the lichen, and dissolved in the surrounding moisture. Lang[858] and Stahlecker[859] have both come to the conclusion that even the quartz grains are corroded by the lichen hyphae. Stahlecker finds that they change the quartz into amorphous silicic acid, and thus bring it into the cycle of organic life. Chalk and magnesia are extracted from the silicates where no other plant could procure them. Lichens are generally rare on pure quartz rocks, chiefly, however, for the mechanical reason that the structure is of too close a grain to afford a foothold.