[52] p. [115] infra.

[53] II, p. 20. In II, p. 49, it is mentioned in connection with the heresy of Marcus, and on p. 104 the same theory is attributed to the “Egyptians.”

[54] p. [66]; II, pp. 21, 64 infra.

[55] ἀγαπητοί, p. [113] and p. [180] infra. It also occurs on p. 125 of Vol. II in the same connection.

[56] λόγος, pp. [107] and [120] infra. He uses the word in the same sense on p. [113].

[57] p. [35] infra.

[58] p. [117] infra.

[59] Pseudo-Hieronymus, Isidorus Hispalensis, and Honorius Augustodunensis, like Epiphanius, begin their catalogues of heresies with the Jewish and Samaritan sects. Philastrius leads off with the Ophites and Sethians whom he declares to be pre-Christian, and then goes on to Dositheus, and the Jewish “heresies” before coming to Simon Magus. Pseudo-Augustine and Prædestinatus begin with Simon Magus and include no pre-Christian sects. See Oehler, Corpus Hæreseologicus, Berlin, 1866, t. i.

[60] II, p. 150 infra.

[61] δόγματα, p. cit.