[13] Deutsche Zeitschrift für Christliche Wissenschaft und Christliches Leben, 1852.
[14] References to nearly all the contributions to this controversy are correctly given in the Prolegomena to Cruice’s edition, pp. x ff. An English translation of Dr. Döllinger’s Hippolytus und Kallistus was published by Plummer, Edinburgh, 1876, and brings the controversy up to date. Cf. also the Bibliography in Salmon’s article “Hippolytus Romanus” in Smith and Wace’s Dictionary of Christian Biography (hereafter quoted as D.C.B.).
[15] See the English translation: Early History of the Christian Church, London, 1909, I, pp. 227 ff.
[16] This is confirmed by Dom. Chapman in the Catholic Encyclopedia, s. vv. “Hippolytus,” “Callistus.”
[17] The statue and its inscription are also reproduced by Bishop Wordsworth in the work above quoted.
[18] Hist. Eccles., VI, c. 20.
[19] Haer. Fab., III, 1.
[20] Peristeph II. For the chronological difficulty that this involves see Salmon, D.C.B., s.v. “Hippolytus Romanus.”
[21] Duchesne, op. cit., p. 233.