As long ago as 1714 the English Government recognised the importance of a really reliable chronometer, and in that year passed an Act offering rewards of £10,000, £15,000, and £20,000 to anybody who should produce a chronometer that would fix longitude within sixty, forty, and thirty miles respectively of accuracy. John Harrison, the son of a Yorkshire carpenter, who had already invented the ingenious "gridiron pendulum" for compensating clocks, took up the challenge. By 1761 he had made a chronometer of so perfect a nature that during a voyage to Jamaica that year, and back the next, it lost only 1 min. 54 1 / 2 sec. As this would enable a captain to find his longitude within eighteen miles in the latitude of Greenwich, Harrison claimed, and ultimately received, the maximum reward.

It was not till nearly a century later that Thomas Earnshaw produced the "compensation balance," now generally used on chronometers and high-class watches. In cheap watches the balance is usually a little three-spoked wheel, which at every tick revolves part of a turn and then flies back again. This will not suffice for very accurate work, because the "moment of inertia" varies at different temperatures. To explain this term let us suppose that a man has a pound of metal to make into a wheel. If the wheel be of small diameter, you will be able to turn it first one way and then the other on its axle quite easily. But should it be melted down and remade into a wheel of four times the diameter, with the same amount of metal as before in the rim, the difficulty of suddenly reversing its motion will be much increased. The weight is the same, but the speed of the rim, and consequently its momentum, is greater. It is evident from this that, if a wheel of certain size be driven by a spring of constant strength, its oscillations will be equal in time; but if a rise of temperature should lengthen the spokes the speed would fall, because the spring would have more work to do; and, conversely, with a fall of temperature the speed would rise. Earnshaw's problem was to construct a balance wheel that should be able to keep its "moment of inertia" constant under all circumstances. He therefore used only two spokes to his wheel, and to the outer extremity of each attached an almost complete semicircle of rim, one end being attached to the spoke, the other all but meeting the other spoke. The rim-pieces were built up of an outer strip of brass, and an inner strip of steel welded together. Brass expands more rapidly than steel, with the result that a bar compounded of these two metals would, when heated, bend towards the hollow side. To the rim-pieces were attached sliding weights, adjustable to the position found by experiment to give the best results.

We can now follow the action of the balance wheel. It runs perfectly correctly at, say, a temperature of 60°. Hold it over a candle. The spokes lengthen, and carry the rim-pieces outwards at their fixed ends; but, as the pieces themselves bend inwards at their free ends, the balance is restored. If the balance were placed in a refrigerating machine, the spokes would shorten, but the rim-pieces would bend outwards.

As a matter of fact, the "moment of inertia" cannot be kept quite constant by this method, because the variation of expansion is more rapid in cold than in heat; so that, though a balance might be quite reliable between 60° and 100°, it would fail between 30° and 60°. So the makers fit their balances with what is called a secondary compensation, the effect of which is to act more quickly in high than in low temperatures. This could not well be explained without diagrams, so a mere mention must suffice.

Another detail of chronometer making which requires very careful treatment is the method of transmitting power from the main spring to the works. As the spring uncoils, its power must decrease, and this loss must be counterbalanced somehow. This is managed by using the "drum and fusee" action, which may be seen in some clocks and in many old watches. The drum is cylindrical, and contains the spring. The fusee is a tapering shaft, in which a spiral groove has been cut from end to end. A very fine chain connects the two parts. The key is applied to the fusee, and the chain is wound off the drum on to the larger end of the fusee first. By the time that the spring has been fully wound, the chain has reached the fusee's smaller extremity. If the fusee has been turned to the correct taper, the driving power of the spring will remain constant as it unwinds, for it gets least leverage over the fusee when it is strongest, and most when it is weakest, the intermediate stages being properly proportioned. To test this, a weighted lever is attached to the key spindle, with the weight so adjusted that the fully wound spring has just sufficient power to lift it over the topmost point of a revolution. It is then allowed a second turn, but if the weight now proves excessive something must be wrong, and the fusee needs its diameter reducing at that point. So the test goes on from turn to turn, and alterations are made until every revolution is managed with exactly the same ease.

The complete chronometer is sent to Greenwich observatory to be tested against the Standard Clock, which, at 10 a.m., flashes the hour to other clocks all over Great Britain. In a special room set apart for the purpose are hundreds of instruments, some hanging up, others lying flat. Assistants make their rounds, noting the errors on each. The temperature test is then applied in special ovens, and finally the article goes back to the maker with a certificate setting forth its performances under different conditions. If the error has been consistent the instrument is sold, the buyer being informed exactly what to allow for each day's error. At the end of the voyage he brings his chronometer to be tested again, and, if necessary, put right.

Here are the actual variations of a chronometer during a nineteen-day test, before being used:—

Day.Gain in
tenths
of seconds.
Day.Gain in
tenths
of seconds.
1st½ 11th4
2nd3 12th3
3rd4 13th3
4th4 14th4
5th½ 15th5
6th3 16th2
7th0 17th3
8th0 18th5
9th 19th1
10th3

An average gain of just over one quarter of a second per diem! Quite extraordinary feats of time-keeping have been recorded of chronometers on long voyages. Thus a chronometer which had been to Australia viâ the Cape and back viâ the Red Sea was only fifteen seconds "out"; and the Encyclopædia Britannica quotes the performance of the three instruments of s.s. Orellana, which between them accumulated an error of but 2·3 seconds during a sixty-three-day trip.

An instrument which will cut a blood corpuscle into several parts—that's the Microtome, the "small-cutter," as the name implies.