[6] Cf. Jacobi, Bhavisattakaha, pp. 83 ff., who suggests the third century; the Prākrit seems anterior to Māhārāṣṭrī in development; Jacobi suggests Ujjayinī as a possible location in view of the affinity to Māhārāṣṭrī and Çaurasenī. Cf. GIL. iii. 8. [↑]
[7] Ed. F. Hall, Calcutta, 1865; trs. G. C. O. Haas, New York, 1912. Jacobi (GGA. 1913, p. 301) presses for the identity of the writers, but the difference of the name is fatal. [↑]
[8] Ed. K. P. Trivedī, Bombay, 1909. [↑]
[9] Ed. K. P. Trivedī, Bombay, 1903; cf. R. G. Bhandarkar, Report (1897) pp. lxviii f. [↑]
[10] Ed. BI. with trs., 1851–75; in part by P. V. Kane, Bombay, 1910. [↑]
[11] Ed. TSS. no. L, 1916. It freely uses the Daçarūpa. Cf. Seshagiri, Report for 1896–97, pp. 7 ff. Many verses by the author are cited. [↑]
[12] For the authorship of the Kāvyaprakāça see Hari Chand, Kālidāsa, pp. 103 ff. [↑]
[13] cc. 337–41. On Dhvani see Keith, Sansk. Lit. ch. x. [↑]
[14] Bharata cited in Rucipati’s comm. on Anargharāghava, 9. Cf. DR. i. 7; SD. 274. [↑]