[66] P. Regnaud, Rhétorique Sanskrite, pp. 266 ff.; Jacobi, ZDMG. lvi. 394 f.; M. Lindenau, Beiträge zur altindischen Rasalehre, Leipzig, 1913. See N. vi. and vii.; DR. iv.; SD. iii.; R. i. 298–ii. 265. [↑]

[67] Mātṛgupta (Hall, DR., p. 33) subdivides sentiment as vācika, produced by words; nepathya, generated by appropriate garlands, ornaments, clothes, &c.; svābhāvika, produced by such natural excellencies as beauty, youth, grace, firmness, courage, &c. [↑]

[68] Ekāvalī, iii, pp. 86 ff.; Kāvyaprakāça (ed. 1889), pp. 86 ff. Cf. R., pp. 173–5. [↑]

[69] See also Abhinavagupta, Dhvanisaṁketa, pp. 67 f.; Alaṁkārasarvasva, p. 9. [↑]

[70] The term is vyutpatti; it is explained by Abhinavagupta, op. cit., p. 70; GGA. 1913, p. 305, n. 1. [↑]

[71] The reference to Brahman shows that we have here the same fusion of doctrine as in Sadānanda’s Vedāntasāra. [↑]

[72] In the same sense we have rasika and bhāvaka (e.g. R., p. 170). [↑]

[73] vi. 7 ff.; Huizinga, De Vidūṣaka in het indisch tooneel, pp. 67 ff. [↑]

[74]

vibhāvair anubhāvaiç ca sāttvikair vyabhicāribhiḥ