[63] Vikramorvaçīya, pp. 4 f. [↑]

[64] AID. p. 8; ZDMG. lxxii. 231. [↑]

[65] SBAW. 1906, pp. 481 ff. [↑]

[66] SBAW. 1916, pp. 698 ff. Contra, Hillebrandt, ZDMG. lxxii. 230 f. Winternitz (ZDMG. lxxiv. 120) reduces the Çaubhikas to people who tell tales of what is depicted on pictures, a clearly impossible version, but valid against Lüders. [↑]

[67] Based on Kaiyaṭa’s version of Çaubhika: Kaṁsādyanukāriṇāṁ naṭānāṁ vyākhyānopādhyāyāḥ. This is clearly incompatible with Lüders’s view, as he admits (pp. 720 f.). Kaiyaṭa is far too late for useful evidence. [↑]

[68] See Vincent Smith, Asoka, (ed. 3), pp. 166 f. [↑]

[69] Bloch, Arch. Survey of India Report, 1903–4, pp. 123 ff. [↑]

[70] p. 344. [↑]

[71] xii. 295. 5. [↑]

[72] Bṛhatsaṁhitā, v. 74; see Hillebrandt, ZDMG. lxxii. 227. [↑]