[113] 559. See Daṇḍin, Kāvyādarça, i. 14 ff., and cf. the analyses of Man̄kha’s Çrīkaṇṭhacarita (twelfth cent.) and Haricandra’s Dharmaçarmābhyudaya in Lévi, TI. i. 337 ff.; Keith, Sansk. Lit., pp. 38 ff. [↑]
[114] See Jacobi, Das Rāmāyaṇa, pp. 119 ff.; Walter, Indica, III. [↑]
[115] Such a drama as the Haragaurīvivāha of Jagajjyotirmalla of Nepal (A.D. 1617–33), which is really a sort of opera with the verses, written in dialect, as the only fixed element (Lévi, Le Népal, i. 242) is of no cogency for the early drama. The Maithilī beginnings of drama, based on the classical, give song in dialect, dialogue in Sanskrit and Prākrit (Lévi, TI. i. 393). [↑]
[116] Kielhorn, IA. xiv. 326 f.; Lüders, Bruchstücke buddhistischer Dramen, p. 63. [↑]
[117] Cf. Weber, IS. viii. 181 ff.; Jacobi, ZDMG. xxxviii. 615 f. [↑]
PART II
THE DEVELOPMENT OF THE SANSKRIT DRAMA
[[80]]