WITH A PLAN

LONGMANS, GREEN, AND CO.
39 PATERNOSTER ROW, LONDON
NEW YORK AND BOMBAY
1902

All rights reserved

CONTENTS

PAGE
[INTRODUCTION]
Achaemenian Inscriptions, written in three styles of Cuneiform character, and in three different languages [ix]
The Decipherment of the Persian Text afforded the clue to the others [xi]
Discovery of Sumerian, the ancient language of Babylonia [xiii]
The Historical Results [xv]
[CHAPTER I]
The Discovery of Achaemenian Ruins and Inscriptions: Barbaro to Le Bruyn: A.D. 1472-1718 [1]
Barbaro visits Chehel Minar and the Tomb of the Mother of Solomon: A.D. 1472 [9]
The Portuguese Missions—Gouvea first mentions the Inscriptions: A.D. 1602 [11]
Don Garcia de Silva Figueroa identifies Chehel Minar with Persepolis: A.D. 1618 [17]
The ‘Viaggi’ of Pietro della Valle: A.D. 1621 [24]
Sir Thomas Herbert, ‘Relation of Some Years Travaile’: A.D. 1627—The first view of Persepolis [33]
Mandelslo’s View of the Tomb of the Mother of Solomon: A.D. 1638 [40]
The French Travellers Daulier Deslandes, Thévenot, and Tavernier: A.D. 1665 [48]
Dr. Hyde’s opinion: A.D. 1700 [59]
Chardin’s Travels—The Drawings of Grélot: A.D. 1711 [61]
Kaempfer first describes the writing as ‘Cuneiform’: A.D. 1712 [69]
He and Le Bruyn make the first copies of Inscriptions: A.D. 1718 [71]
[CHAPTER II]
Niebuhr to De Morgan: A.D. 1765-1897 [76]
Niebuhr’s ‘Voyage en Arabie’: A.D. 1765 [76]
Grotefend begins the Decipherment: A.D. 1802 [82]
Morier identifies the Tomb of Cyrus: A.D. 1809 [85]
Sir William Ouseley’s Travels: A.D. 1811 [87]
Sir R. Ker Porter becomes the chief authority: A.D. 1818 [90]
The Sphere of Discovery widens—The Elvend and Van Inscriptions: A.D. 1827 [94]
Rich visits Persepolis: A.D. 1821—His book published: A.D. 1839 [96]
Westergaard copies Inscription at Naksh-i-Rustam: A.D. 1843 [102]
Major Rawlinson at Behistun: A.D. 1837-44 [102]
The French Expeditions: A.D. 1840, Texier [115]
” ” ” Flandin and Coste [118]
Stolze’s Photographic Views: A.D. 1878 [128]
Dieulafoy: A.D. 1881 [131]
Lord Curzon: A.D. 1890 [131]
Susa visited by Kinneir, Rawlinson, and Layard [133]
Loftus excavates the Apadana: A.D. 1852 [135]
Dieulafoy discovers the Lion and Archers friezes: A.D. 1885 [138]
De Morgan and the Old Susian Inscriptions: A.D. 1897-9 [143]
Inscriptions found in Egypt [146]
[CHAPTER III]
Decipherment of the First or Persian Column: Tychsen to Lassen: A.D. 1798-1886 [149]
Niebuhr gives the first Old Persian Alphabet [149]
The predecessors of Grotefend: Tychsen and Münter: A.D. 1798 [151]
Hager on Babylonian Inscriptions: A.D. 1801 [163]
Lichtenstein thinks them Arabic [166]
Grotefend deciphers ‘Hystaspes, Darius, and Xerxes’: A.D. 1802 [168]
Discoveries on the site of Babylon: A.D. 1808-11 [192]
Rich’s Two Memoirs [193]
St. Martin introduces Grotefend to France: A.D. 1822 [195]
Rask identifies two letters: A.D. 1826 [202]
Burnouf’s ‘Mémoires sur deux Inscriptions’: A.D. 1836 [204]
His Translations [215]
Lassen’s ‘Altpersischen Keilinschriften’: A.D. 1836 [220]
Holtzmann’s charge of plagiarism [223]
[CHAPTER IV]
Beer and Jacquet to Rawlinson: A.D. 1838-46 [237]
Jacquet’s contributions to the ‘Journal Asiatique’: A.D. 1838 [239]
Rawlinson translates two paragraphs of the Behistun Inscription for the Royal Asiatic Society: A.D. 1838 [244]
He deciphers two new characters: A.D. 1839 [248]
Grotefend’s later contributions: Identifies Artaxerxes: A.D. 1837 [251]
Lassen and Westergaard’s edition of the Persian and Susian Inscriptions: A.D. 1845 [253]
Holtzmann’s Criticism [262]
Edward Hincks begins his contributions: June 1846 [265]
Rawlinson’s Supplementary Note and Memoir: A.D. 1846 [271]
Estimate of his claims as a decipherer [275]
His revised Translation of the Inscriptions [291]
Hitzig, Benfey, and Oppert: A.D. 1847 [294]
[CHAPTER V]
Decipherment of the Second or Susian Column: Westergaard to Oppert: A.D. 1844-52 [298]
The early efforts of Grotefend [299]
Westergaard’s Essay and Translations: A.D. 1844-5 [300]
Hincks’s Contributions: A.D. 1846-7 [307]
De Saulcy, Löwenstern, and Holtzmann: A.D. 1850 [309]
Norris: Contributions to ‘J. R. A. S.’: 1855 [314]
Oppert’s first success [320]
Old Susian and Malamir Inscriptions [322]
Various names proposed for the Second Column [324]
Oppert on ‘Le Peuple des Mèdes’: A.D. 1879 [326]
[CHAPTER VI]
Decipherment of the Third or Babylonian Column: Hincks and Rawlinson: A.D. 1846-51 [337]
The Babylonian Inscriptions: Michaux Stone and East India House [337]
The Assyrian Inscriptions discovered by Botta and Layard: A.D. 1843-5 [339]
Botta: ‘Essai de Déchiffrement’: A.D. 1845 [343]
On the Varieties of Writing [343]
The language of the Babylonian and Assyrian Inscriptions shown to be identical with that of the Third Column—It is Semitic [348]
First attempt to decipher it—Grotefend: A.D. 1824-40 [352]
Löwenstern on Asdod: A.D. 1845 [355]
Hincks’s Essay of June 1846 [357]
Rawlinson: A.D. 1847 [362]
Criticised by Löwenstern in ‘Exposé des Eléments’: A.D. 1847 [364]
Hincks: The Khorsabad Inscription: June 1849 [369]
” The Appendix: Jan. 1850 [374]
” Mode of Writing: August 1850 [375]
Rawlinson: Second Memoir prepared: A.D. 1849 [377]
” The Two Lectures: Jan. and Feb. 1850 [379]
” Earliest Assyrian Translation from Black Obelisk [382]
” Publication of Third Column of Behistun Inscription: A.D. 1851 [386]
The Services of Hincks and Rawlinson compared [396]
The Claims of De Saulcy examined [398]
Conclusion [407]
[APPENDICES]
A.—Table showing the different values assigned to each letter of the Old Persian Alphabet [420]
B.—Table showing the true values of the Old Persian letters and the author and date of their decipherment [426]
C.—Table showing the different values given to each sign of the Susian (Median) Syllabary [430]
Index [443]
Plan of Persepolis [Frontispiece]

[The Plan of Persepolis is inserted by kind permission of Lord Curzon of Kedleston from his work ‘Persia and the Persian Question.’]

INTRODUCTION