[125] Goldast, op. cit., vol. ii, Opera Omnia de Potestate Ecclesiastica & Politica, G. Ockham, esp. Dialogus, pp. 822-30. The chief conclusions of Ockham are summarized on pp. 396-7; also in S. Riezler, Die literarischen Widersacher der Päpste zur Zeit Ludwig des Baiers (1874), pp. 258-71. But see generally pp. 241-77.
[126] See Poole, op. cit., p. 277, note.
[127] Defensor Pacis, Lib. I, cap. xviii; in Goldast, op. cit., vol. ii, pp. 86-9.
[128] Ibid., Lib. II, cap. viii, p. 212.
[129] Defensor Pacis, Lib. II, cap. ix, p. 213.
[130] Ibid., cap. x, pp. 216-19, esp. p. 217. ‘Nemo quantumcunque peccans contra disciplinas speculativas aut operativas quascunque punitur vel arcetur in hoc seculo praecise inquantum-hujusmodi, sed inquantum peccat contra praeceptum humanae legis.’
[131] Ibid., Lib. I, cap. xii, pp. 169-71.
[132] Workman, op. cit., vol. i. ‘Wyclif has been called the Morning Star of the Reformation, but the author of the Defensor Pacis might more justly claim the title.’ Cf., on modernity of Marsiglio’s thought, B. Labanca, Marsilio da Padova (Padua, 1882), pp. 219 et seq.
[133] Fitzralph’s treatise, De Pauperie Salvatoris, is printed as an appendix to Wycliffe’s De Dominio Divino (Wyclif Society, 1890), pp. 259-476.
[134] For this whole subject, see Lea, vol. iii, pp. 590-4.